AI Leaders Warn UN Security Council of Existential Risks, Call for Global AI Governance

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

57 Sources

Share

Top AI executives including Sam Altman and Dario Amodei briefed the UN Security Council on catastrophic risks posed by artificial intelligence. DeepSeek joined OpenAI and Anthropic in urging international coordination on AI safety, while industry leaders debated whether slowing down AI development is realistic amid US-China tensions.

OpenAI and Anthropic CEOs Sound Alarm on AI Risk at UN Security Council

Sam Altman and Dario Amodei delivered stark warnings to the UN Security Council during its first-ever meeting on artificial intelligence and international security, with both executives emphasizing that AI risk demands urgent global attention

3

5

. Amodei stated that AI "if managed poorly, could be a risk to humanity as a whole," while Altman warned that "we could lose control of the future to AI"

3

. The Anthropic CEO argued that existential risks to humanity cannot be dismissed regardless of probability estimates, telling the Security Council that "it doesn't matter whether people put the risk of catastrophe at 10 percent or 1 percent or 12 percent or 0.1 percent. None of these levels are remotely acceptable"

5

.

Source: The Next Web

Source: The Next Web

DeepSeek Joins Frontier AI Companies in UN Briefing

Chinese AI startup DeepSeek participated in the Security Council briefing alongside OpenAI and Anthropic, marking a significant moment for international coordination on AI safety

1

. The meeting took place during the UN General Assembly, with Chinese AI firms including Moonshot also invited to make statements

1

. However, DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng did not attend personally

1

. This development comes as the Security Council, charged with maintaining international peace and security, addresses AI governance for only the second time since first meeting on the topic in 2023

1

.

Source: The Next Web

Source: The Next Web

Push for Global Standards for AI and International Coordination

Both Altman and Amodei called for establishing global standards for AI that would create common frameworks for evaluating capabilities and societal risks posed by AI systems

4

5

. Altman specifically advocated for "national and international" AI standards covering risk measurement, AI safeguards, and maintaining human oversight over autonomous systems

4

. He emphasized that "if AI is to be democratic, the most important decisions cannot be made by labs in San Francisco alone"

4

5

. Amodei proposed starting with "narrow agreements," including a ban on using AI to make biological weapons and establishing notification systems for misuses significant to global security

5

. Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue echoed these calls, stating that "the global community needs stronger standards for monitoring and incident disclosure"

4

.

Industry Divided on Whether to Slow Down AI Development

The proposal to regulate AI development and slow its pace has sparked fierce debate within the technology sector. Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora told CNBC that coordinated slowdown efforts are "unrealistic," arguing that "some people will jump the gun, and you'll have still people developing at the frontier"

2

. Arora questioned the 10% probability estimate for AI wiping out humanity, calling it "extremely small," and his views align closely with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who said new regulations aren't needed and developers should self-regulate by properly testing products before release

2

. Meanwhile, Amodei has committed Anthropic to slowing development as needed, stating "we will slow down as much as necessary in order to make sure that every successive AI technology that we release is actually safe"

4

.

Geopolitical Tensions Complicate US-China Cooperation on AI Safety

The path toward international coordination faces significant obstacles due to geopolitical tensions between the United States and China, the world's two AI superpowers. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that senior US and Chinese officials agreed to hold further talks on AI safety, with discussions about establishing a "US-China AI Dialogue" and a notification mechanism for national security incidents

1

2

. However, Chinese state media has dismissed calls for slowing AI development as stemming from a "Cold War playbook" aimed at preserving Washington's dominance in frontier AI technology

1

. Arora expressed skepticism about coordination possibilities, noting that "the first step is for us to get some semblance around what do we actually want before we start talking about let's coordinate that with somebody else"

2

. The UN Security Council meeting occurred just hours before Chinese President Xi Jinping's scheduled state visit with President Trump in Washington, where AI governance was expected to be discussed

5

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved