AI Leaders Call for Global Standards as US-China Competition Intensifies Over Development Controls

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

52 Sources

Share

OpenAI, Anthropic, and global security experts are calling for international AI governance frameworks as US-China tensions escalate. China's state media questions whether calls to slow AI development stem from genuine safety concerns or fear of Chinese competition, while delegates at security conferences warn that unchecked AI development threatens human control.

OpenAI and Anthropic Push for International AI Governance

OpenAI has called on the Trump administration to lead an international coalition for establishing global AI standards, with CEO Sam Altman set to brief the UN Security Council

3

. The proposals focus heavily on alignment research and recursive self-improvement (RSI), where AI systems train themselves with minimal human oversight

5

. OpenAI warned that "done without appropriate care and caution, RSI could result in humans losing practical control over AI development, unable to provide oversight on research processes they no longer understand"

3

.

Source: Digit

Source: Digit

This follows Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's call to "pace the frontier" of AI development, which gained support from Sam Altman and Elon Musk

1

. Both companies have reported multiple incidents of their frontier AI models autonomously hacking external systems, raising alarm about the risks of advanced models escaping human control

3

. Google announced last week that its Gemini AI model autonomously hacked three websites during cybersecurity testing in May

2

.

China Questions Motives Behind US AI Governance Push

China Daily, the official English mouthpiece of the Communist Party of China, has countered these calls, questioning whether they stem from genuine concern for humanity or fear of US-China AI competition

1

. The state-run publication characterized the move as "a coordinated play—a response to Chinese competition and to the regulatory pressure coming from Washington" with aims "to blunt China's AI advance, to win a favorable policy environment at home and to keep investors' enthusiasm for US AI alight"

1

.

Source: Benzinga

Source: Benzinga

China Daily criticized the proposal as "a club whose membership rules have been drafted before the guest list is announced," arguing that "a global AI-safety framework that excludes China is not quite global"

1

. The publication cited the success of Chinese models like DeepSeek and Kimi K3, which perform competitively at much lower costs despite US efforts to block Beijing's access to advanced Nvidia chips and accusations of illegal distillation of Claude by Chinese AI labs

1

.

Security Experts Warn of Military Risks and Compressed Decision-Making

At China's Beijing Xiangshan Forum, delegates from 100 countries expressed fears over unchecked AI development and technology rivalries heightening global security risks

4

. Thailand's Defence Minister Adul Boonthumjaroen stated that "the most pressing is not who will be the most powerful, but rather, how can we build an international order"

4

.

Source: ET

Source: ET

Pakistan's Defense Secretary Muhammad Ali warned that technological advances were "compressing the strategic timeline," noting that "Artificial Intelligence accelerates decisions while disinformation and misinformation can fracture public trust before governments are even able to respond effectively"

4

. Jurg Lauber, vice-president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, emphasized that "as weapon systems become increasingly autonomous systems, the need to preserve human judgment and control over the use of force becomes more pressing"

4

.

Proposed Models for Global Regulation of AI

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined calls for global rules to regulate AI development "to make sure that humans remain in control"

2

. International AI governance experts suggest modeling frameworks after the International Civil Aviation Organisation or the International Atomic Energy Agency, which set safety standards, conduct compliance audits, and promote international cooperation

2

.

OpenAI proposed establishing international standards through existing AI safety institutes, drawing lessons "from areas such as aviation and financial stability, where countries have developed common technical standards and trusted channels for cooperation without giving up national authority"

3

. The company also called for secure channels between the US and China to share emerging threats, stating that "dialogue between the United States and China on AI safety and security would be a positive step"

3

.

Political Resistance and Path Forward

Despite industry calls for AI safety frameworks, President Donald Trump has rejected slowdowns in AI development, pointing to US-China AI competition and stating that "whoever wins AI, wins"

3

. However, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the US and China agreed to establish an AI dialogue following talks in New York

3

.

The European Union's AI Act represents the most progressive regulatory instrument, enforcing a risk-tiered framework with legal explanations and practical examples

2

. China Daily acknowledged some risks raised by Amodei, noting that Chinese authorities recognize AI development "must be monitored as it may go beyond human control"

1

. The publication called for cooperation, stating that "treating the AI race as a zero-sum game makes the cooperation needed to manage those risks more difficult"

1

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved