19 Sources
[1]
Court Ruling in Getty's AI Copyright Case Has Both Sides Claiming a Win. Here's Why
A new court ruling has tumbled into place in the kaleidoscope of cases intended to set boundaries on what AI companies can and can't do with creative works produced by humans, and by extension what it is that AI tools can serve up to their users. On Tuesday, Justice Joanna Smith ruled that
[2]
Stability AI's legal win over Getty leaves copyright law in limbo
Stability AI, the creator of popular AI art tool Stable Diffusion, was largely victorious against Getty Images on Tuesday in a British legal battle over the material used to train AI models. The case originally looked set to produce a landmark ruling on AI and copyright in the UK, but it landed
[3]
Getty loses UK copyright battle against Stability AI
Experts disagree about what the ruling means for AI training on copyrighted material London's High Court has dismissed the major portions of Getty Images' lawsuit against generative AI firm Stability AI for training its image-generation model on copyrighted images, which some legal experts say
[4]
Creative groups fail to secure UK legal precedent in Getty AI copyright case
Creative groups hoping to secure a legal breakthrough against artificial intelligence groups scraping their content have been left disappointed after Getty Images lost a central plank of a UK copyright lawsuit against Stability AI. In a nuanced ruling on Tuesday, the High Court in London largely
[5]
UK High Court sides with Stability AI over Getty in copyright case
A judge ruled in Stability's favor despite finding some evidence of copyright infringement. Stability AI has partially succeeded in defending itself against accusations of copyright infringement. As reported by The Guardian, Stability AI prevailed in a high-profile UK High Court case, following
[6]
Stability AI largely wins UK court battle against Getty Images over copyright and trademark
LONDON (AP) -- Artificial intelligence company Stability AI mostly prevailed against Getty Images Tuesday in a British court battle over intellectual property. Seattle-based Getty Images, which owns an extensive online library of images and video, had filed suit against Stability AI in a widely
[7]
Getty Images Mostly Loses its Legal Battle Against Stability AI
A court in London has largely sided with Stability AI in its legal battle with Getty Images, marking a significant ruling in the ongoing debate over how copyright laws apply to generative AI. Seattle-based Getty Images, one of the largest photo agencies in the world, sued Stability AI in the UK's
[8]
AI firm wins high court ruling after photo agency's copyright claim
Ruling in case brought by Getty Images against Stability AI is seen as a blow to copyright owners A London-based artificial intelligence firm has won a landmark high court case examining the legality of AI models using vast troves of copyrighted data without permission. Stability AI, whose
[9]
Getty Images largely loses lawsuit against UK AI firm
US media company Getty Images largely lost a case it brought against a British AI firm over use of its copyrighted content without permission, a court in London said on Tuesday. Getty had alleged that London-based Stability AI, whose directors include Canadian filmmaker James Cameron, "extracted
[10]
Getty loses major UK copyright lawsuit against Stability AI
The lawsuit's conclusion has raised concerns around the strength of secondary copyright in the UK. The London High Court has dismissed major portions of a Getty copyright lawsuit against UK start-up Stability AI, with some experts believing it could reshape how the law understands artificial
[11]
UK court mostly sides with Stability AI in AI copyright lawsuit - SiliconANGLE
UK court mostly sides with Stability AI in AI copyright lawsuit A UK court has mostly sided with Stability AI Ltd. in a case that focused on the startup's use of copyrighted images to train artificial intelligence models. The High Court of Justice issued the ruling today. London-based Stability
[12]
Stability AI largely wins U.K. court battle against Getty Images
Seattle-based Getty had accused Stability AI of infringing its copyright and trademark by scraping 12 million images from its website, without permission, to train its popular image generator, Stable Diffusion. The closely followed case at Britain's High Court was among the first in a wave of
[13]
Stability AI largely wins court battle against Getty Images over copyright, trademark
LONDON -- Artificial intelligence company Stability AI mostly prevailed against Getty Images Tuesday in a British court battle over intellectual property. Seattle-based Getty Images, which owns an extensive online library of images and video, had filed suit against Stability AI in a widely watched
[14]
Stability AI largely wins UK court battle against Getty Images over copyright and trademark
LONDON (AP) -- Artificial intelligence company Stability AI mostly prevailed against Getty Images Tuesday in a British court battle over intellectual property. Seattle-based Getty Images, which owns an extensive online library of images and video, had filed suit against Stability AI in a widely
[15]
Stability AI Largely Wins UK Court Battle Against Getty Images Over Copyright and Trademark
LONDON (AP) -- Artificial intelligence company Stability AI mostly prevailed against Getty Images Tuesday in a British court battle over intellectual property. Seattle-based Getty Images, which owns an extensive online library of images and video, had filed suit against Stability AI in a widely
[16]
Getty Images largely loses landmark UK lawsuit over AI image generator
Getty Images largely lost its copyright lawsuit against Stability AI over its image generator. While Getty partially succeeded on trademark infringement, the court dismissed its secondary copyright infringement claim. The ruling's scope is considered limited due to evidence gaps regarding AI
[17]
The Getty vs Stability AI ruling is a blow to artists
While many artists see the training of AI image generators using unlicensed work as theft, but the UK High Court has just decided otherwise, and the case could influence future rulings and public policy. Getty Images sued the AI developer Stability AI, claiming that it had committed secondary copy
[18]
Stability AI largely wins U.K. court battle against Getty Images over copyright and trademark
LONDON -- Artificial intelligence company Stability AI mostly prevailed against Getty Images Tuesday in a British court battle over intellectual property. Seattle-based Getty Images, which owns an extensive online library of images and video, had filed suit against Stability AI in a widely watched
[19]
Getty Images largely loses landmark UK lawsuit over AI image generator
LONDON (Reuters) -Getty Images largely lost its landmark lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI over its image generator at London's High Court on Tuesday. Seattle-based Getty, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accused Stability AI of using
Share
Copy Link
The UK High Court ruled largely in favor of Stability AI in Getty Images' copyright lawsuit, finding that AI models don't infringe copyright by training on protected works. However, the narrow ruling failed to establish clear precedent on AI training legality, disappointing creative industries seeking stronger protections.
The UK High Court delivered a mixed verdict on Tuesday in the closely watched copyright case between Getty Images and Stability AI, largely siding with the AI company while leaving fundamental questions about AI training on copyrighted material unresolved. Justice Joanna Smith ruled that Stability AI's Stable Diffusion model did not violate copyright law during training, stating that the AI system "does not store or reproduce any Copyright Works and nor has it ever done so"
1
.
Source: ET
The case, originally filed in 2023, represented one of the first major legal challenges in the UK against an AI company for allegedly scraping copyrighted content without permission
2
. Getty Images had accused Stability AI of "unlawfully" using millions of images from its vast archive to train the popular Stable Diffusion image generation model.Despite the high-profile nature of the case, legal experts expressed disappointment with the ruling's narrow scope. Getty was forced to abandon its primary copyright infringement claims mid-trial due to insufficient evidence that the AI model's training occurred within UK jurisdiction
3
. This left the court to consider only secondary infringement claims, significantly limiting the precedential value of the decision.Iain Connor, an intellectual property partner at law firm Michelmores, described the case as a "massive damp squib," noting that "the decision leaves the UK without a meaningful verdict on the lawfulness of an AI model's process of learning from copyright materials"
4
. Justice Smith herself acknowledged that her findings were "both historic and extremely limited in scope."While Getty largely lost on copyright grounds, the court did find in the company's favor regarding trademark infringement. Justice Smith determined that Stability AI violated Getty's trademark protections when its system generated images containing Getty Images and iStock watermarks
1
. Importantly, the court rejected Stability AI's argument that individual users should bear responsibility for such infringements, placing liability squarely on the model provider.
Source: Silicon Republic
"The Court rejected Stability AI's attempt to hold the user responsible for that infringement, confirming that responsibility for the presence of such trademarks lies with the model provider, who has control over the images used to train the model," Getty stated following the ruling
3
.Related Stories
The nuanced nature of the ruling allowed both companies to declare success. Stability AI's general counsel Christian Dowell emphasized that the decision "ultimately resolves the copyright concerns that were the core issue," highlighting that Getty had voluntarily dismissed most of its copyright claims
1
.Getty, meanwhile, focused on the trademark victory and the court's confirmation that its copyrighted works were indeed used in training, stating this finding would support its ongoing case in the United States
4
. The company voluntarily dismissed its Delaware lawsuit against Stability in August, refiling in California where it hopes for a more favorable outcome.The ruling arrives amid a wave of similar copyright cases worldwide, with recent decisions in the United States generally favoring AI companies. Meta and Anthropic have both secured victories in copyright disputes, with courts finding their use of copyrighted material for AI training constituted "fair use"
4
.
Source: Creative Bloq
Robert Guthrie, a partner at law firm Osborne Clarke, characterized the judgment as "a big win for Stability AI and AI developers generally," suggesting it would "give encouragement to AI developers that AI models trained on third party copyright protected works do not infringe copyright in the UK"
4
.However, creative industry representatives expressed frustration with the outcome. Nick Eziefula from law firm Simkins noted that the decision "will frustrate many in the creative industries"
4
, while the Publishers Association emphasized that this case was "not the end of the road" for UK creators and rights holders seeking stronger protections against unauthorized AI training4
.Summarized by
Navi
[3]
26 Jun 2025•Technology

12 Nov 2025•Policy and Regulation

09 Jun 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
