3 Sources
[1]
Telegram CEO says 'takedown extortionist' was responsible for the app being briefly delisted by Apple - Engadget
Pavel Durov claims there's "a potential systemic risk" for platforms with user-generated content. Telegram founder Pavel Durov took to social media to address the circumstances of the app's brief removal from the App Store earlier this week. The exec claimed that the service was targeted by "a
[2]
Durov says fake reports triggered Telegram's App store removal
Telegram founder Pavel Durov said a "takedown extortionist" was responsible for the app's brief removal from Apple's App Store earlier this week. In a post on X, Durov said a malicious actor edited an old message in an active group chat to display "AI-modified illegal content" that group members
[3]
Telegram founder warns of new AI-powered threat that can force apps like Instagram removed from Playstore; calls it 'takedown extortion'
Telegram founder Pavel Durov has warned app developers of an emerging cyber threat he calls takedown extortion, after Apple briefly removed Telegram from its App Store following an attack in which a user planted AI-modified illegal content inside a public group chat. Durov said the app was restored
Share
Copy Link
Telegram was briefly removed from Apple's App Store after an extortionist planted AI-modified illegal content in a group chat and reported it directly to Apple. Pavel Durov warns this AI-powered cyber threat creates systemic risk for platforms hosting user-generated content, including Instagram, YouTube and X.
Telegram was temporarily delisted from the Apple App Store earlier this week following what founder Pavel Durov calls a "takedown extortion" attack. The incident involved a malicious actor who edited an old message in an active group chat to display AI-modified illegal content that group members would not notice or report
1
2
. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting the company, though the app was restored within hours3
.Telegram CEO Pavel Durov explained the attack method in detail. The extortionist inserted AI-modified illegal pornographic content by editing an old message inside an existing group chat rather than posting new content
3
. Because the content was placed inside an existing message, it remained hidden from group members, preventing them from seeing or reporting it. Telegram's moderation systems, built to detect and remove illegal content from public groups, did not flag it for the same reason3
. The attacker then deployed automated accounts to report the planted content directly to Apple, setting up an extortion attempt where the actor threatened to continue unless Telegram paid1
2
.Durov warned that this incident exposes a systemic risk for platforms with user-generated content. "Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting us. This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content," he stated
1
2
. He emphasized that if an app used by more than a billion people can be removed from the App Store without prior warning, any app can be3
. This vulnerability extends to major social platforms including Instagram, YouTube, and X3
.The proliferation of AI tools has made this type of AI-powered cyber threat easier to execute. Between video and image editing tools in chatbots and the speed of task execution agents are capable of, attackers can now modify content in ways that bypass traditional moderation systems
1
. Pavel Durov noted that the fact attackers had to resort to backdating content inside old messages and making it invisible to group members was evidence that standard methods of planting illegal content no longer work on Telegram3
. The method represents a technical escalation from earlier forms of coordinated abuse that relied on mass false reporting alone3
.Related Stories
The incident reignites questions about platform accountability and how gatekeepers like Apple should respond to abuse reports. Apple acted on the report filed directly by the attacker and removed the app delisted by Apple from the App Store before making any contact with Telegram's team
3
. This sequence exposed a significant gap in how platform gatekeepers respond to abuse reports involving user-generated content. Responsibility for user-generated content is not a new issue, and questions about culpability for users' possible illegal activity have been debated for years1
. Telegram and Durov have faced similar scrutiny before over possible illegal activity on the platform2
.Durov made his account of the incident public to alert other developers and online communities to what he described as an evolving threat
3
. He said takedown extortion tactics are evolving and that any platform hosting user-generated content is now a potential target3
. Durov added that Telegram has extensive experience identifying tricks used by coordinated reporting gangs and protecting legitimate communities, even when doing so risks the app being temporarily removed from the App Store, and warned that other platforms may not be equally prepared3
. Developers should prepare for similar attacks by strengthening their ability to detect edited historical messages and establishing direct communication channels with app store operators to prevent removal without warning.Summarized by
Navi
1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Science and Research
