2 Sources
[1]
Telegram CEO says 'takedown extortionist' was responsible for the app being briefly delisted by Apple - Engadget
Pavel Durov claims there's "a potential systemic risk" for platforms with user-generated content. Telegram founder Pavel Durov took to social media to address the circumstances of the app's brief removal from the App Store earlier this week. The exec claimed that the service was targeted by "a takedown extortionist." In a lengthy post on X, Durov alleged that a malicious actor edited an old message in an active group chat to show "AI-modified illegal content" that wouldn't be seen and reported by the group's members. He claimed this laid the scene for an extortion attempt, where the actor would use a fleet of automated accounts to report their own post to Apple if the company didn't pay to be left alone. "Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting us. This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content." Responsibility for user-generated content is not a new issue. Questions about culpability for users' possible illegal activity has been a debate for social media networks for years. It also isn't the first time Telegram and Durov have been the subjects of those exact questions. Between video and image editing tools in chatbots and the speed of task execution agents are capable of, the proliferation of AI has made it potentially easier for an extortionist to carry out this type of attack.
[2]
Durov says fake reports triggered Telegram's App store removal
Telegram founder Pavel Durov said a "takedown extortionist" was responsible for the app's brief removal from Apple's App Store earlier this week. In a post on X, Durov said a malicious actor edited an old message in an active group chat to display "AI-modified illegal content" that group members would not notice or report. Durov said the edited post was used to set up an extortion attempt. He said the actor threatened to deploy automated accounts to report the post to Apple unless Telegram paid. "Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting," Durov said. "Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting us. This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content." The incident adds to a long-running debate over how platforms should handle user-generated content and whether they are responsible for illegal material posted by users. Telegram and Durov have faced similar scrutiny before over possible illegal activity on the platform. Durov also said the spread of AI tools has made this type of attack easier to carry out.
Share
Copy Link
Telegram founder Pavel Durov revealed that a malicious actor edited old messages in a group chat to display AI-modified illegal content, then threatened to deploy automated accounts to report the fake posts unless paid. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting the company, raising concerns about systemic risk for all platforms hosting user-generated content.
Pavel Durov disclosed that Telegram's brief removal from Apple's App Store this week resulted from what he called a "takedown extortionist" exploiting platform vulnerabilities
1
. The Telegram founder explained that a malicious actor edited an old message in an active group chat to show AI-generated illegal content that wouldn't be noticed or reported by the group's members2
. This manipulation set the stage for an extortion attempt where the actor threatened to use automated accounts to file fake reports with Apple unless Telegram paid to be left alone.Durov criticized Apple's response in a lengthy post on X, stating that the company removed Telegram from the App Store before reaching out to discuss the reported content. "Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting," Durov said
1
. The incident highlights how quickly platforms can face consequences based on user reports, even when those reports stem from manipulated or AI-modified illegal content deliberately planted by bad actors.The Telegram CEO warned that this incident creates "a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content"
2
. His concern centers on how easily extortionists can now weaponize app store reporting mechanisms against platforms. With AI tools making it easier to create convincing fake content and automated accounts capable of filing mass reports, any platform allowing user-generated content could face similar attacks. The speed at which Apple acted—removing Telegram before investigation or contact—suggests that app store operators may be vulnerable to manipulation through coordinated fake reports.Durov specifically noted that the proliferation of AI has made this type of attack easier to execute
1
. Video and image editing tools in chatbots, combined with the speed of task execution agents, enable malicious actors to create convincing AI-modified illegal content quickly. The ability to edit old messages in a group chat without triggering immediate attention from active members adds another layer of sophistication to the extortion scheme. This development signals a troubling evolution in how bad actors can leverage AI tools to target platforms and app stores.Related Stories
The incident adds fuel to the ongoing debate over platform accountability for user-generated content
2
. Questions about culpability for users' possible illegal activity have dominated discussions around social media networks for years. Telegram and Pavel Durov have faced similar scrutiny before regarding illegal activity on the platform1
. However, this case introduces a new dimension: what happens when the illegal content itself is fabricated by a malicious actor specifically to trigger platform removal? The question of responsibility becomes murkier when extortion, rather than genuine user behavior, drives the reported violations.App developers should watch how Apple and other app store operators respond to this revelation. Will they implement verification steps before removing apps based on user reports? The current approach—immediate removal without contact—leaves platforms vulnerable to extortion attempts and could disrupt services for millions of users. For Telegram users and those on similar platforms, this incident demonstrates how external threats can temporarily impact app availability, even when the platform itself hasn't violated policies. The emergence of AI-powered extortion tactics targeting app stores represents a new frontier in platform security that will require coordinated responses from app developers, store operators, and security experts.
Summarized by
Navi
1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Technology
