The Rise of Pseudolaw and AI: A Growing Threat to Legal Systems

The Emergence of Pseudolaw in Australian Courts

A new study published in the Alternative Law Journal by UniSA Associate Professor of Law Joe McIntyre has shed light on a growing phenomenon in the Australian legal system: pseudolaw. This disruptive movement is characterized by false legal theories that mimic the language and rituals of the law without any real substance, posing a significant threat to the courts and democracy 1

1

2

Source: Newswise

Defining Pseudolaw and Its Impact

Pseudolaw cases have proliferated since the COVID-19 pandemic, with hundreds of cases reported in New South Wales alone in the past six months. These cases often involve so-called Sovereign Citizens who question authority, embrace conspiracy theories, and co-opt legal language to create an "alternative" legal universe 1

1

2

Common pseudolaw claims include:

1. Insisting that courts lack authority due to incorrect coat of arms displays
2. Arguing that individuals are "natural persons" immune from legal obligations
3. Citing historical documents like the Magna Carta to avoid modern legal requirements

The impact of pseudolaw on the legal system has been significant, with one South Australian judge describing it as having "changed the whole face of the civil justice system" 1

1

2

The Intersection of Pseudolaw and AI

Assoc. Prof. McIntyre warns that the rise of pseudolaw is coinciding with the increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models. This convergence poses a new threat to the justice system 1

1

2

Litigants are increasingly using AI to generate:

1. Written legal responses
2. Real-time oral submissions to the bench

The combination of pseudolaw and AI could "turbocharge" misinformation in courts, overwhelming judges and administrators with plausible-looking but fundamentally flawed legal arguments 1

1

2

Related Stories

AI in Legal Proceedings Fuels Sharp Rise in Pro Se Litigants, Straining US Courts

AI-Generated Errors in Australian Murder Case Highlight Risks of Unverified AI Use in Legal Proceedings

AI Hallucinations in Legal Filings: A Growing Concern for US Courts

AI-Generated Legal Citations Lead to Sanctions and Raise Concerns in Courts

Root Causes and Consequences

The study identifies several factors contributing to the rise of pseudolaw:

1. Public alienation from the legal system
2. Lack of ability to distinguish genuine law from imitation
3. The legal system's use of archaic language and rituals

While pseudolaw can sometimes appear absurd or comical, its consequences are serious. It undermines trust in institutions, threatens judicial officers, and harms vulnerable litigants who may be misled by false promises of legal loopholes 1

1

2

Source: Phys.org

Addressing the Challenge

Assoc. Prof. McIntyre argues that pseudolaw is a symptom of deeper issues within the legal system, including:

1. Diminishing access to justice over the past 50 years
2. Chronic underinvestment in civics and legal literacy education

To combat this growing threat, the study suggests that meaningful public engagement with the law is crucial. It calls for reflection on legal institutions and how they may be contributing to the phenomenon of pseudolaw 1

1

2

As the intersection of pseudolaw and AI continues to evolve, it presents a unique challenge to legal systems worldwide, demanding innovative solutions to preserve the integrity of the justice system and maintain public trust in legal institutions.