Senators Push FTC Investigation Into Amazon and Walmart AI Chatbots Over Made in USA Label Issues

Senators Demand Federal Investigation Into Retail Giants

Senators Tammy Baldwin and Rick Scott have formally requested the Federal Trade Commission to investigate Amazon and Walmart over allegations that their AI chatbots systematically suppress products labeled 'made in the USA'1

1

. In a bipartisan letter addressed to FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson and Commissioner Mark Meador, the senators cited serious concerns about how Alexa for Shopping and Sparky AI shopping assistants handle country-of-origin information3

3

. The request follows mounting evidence that these AI chatbots may be undermining American manufacturing while misleading consumers about product origins.

Columbia University Report Exposes AI Chatbot Behavior

A July report from Columbia University's Center for Law and the Economy uncovered troubling patterns in how Amazon and Walmart's AI systems respond to queries about domestically produced goods2

2

. The study revealed that when researchers asked Alexa for Shopping to find Made in USA products, the chatbot claimed it lacked access to that information. Yet when asked to display products made in China, Alexa readily generated a comprehensive list5

5

. Even more revealing, when questioned about the absence of a Made in USA filter, Alexa reportedly stated it would "redirect significant sales away from their largest seller base," explicitly referencing overseas manufacturers1

1

.

Walmart's Sparky chatbot demonstrated similar behavior during testing. Initially, Sparky claimed it could not evaluate the accuracy of fraudulent 'made in USA' claims3

3

. However, when researchers pressed the chatbot with more detailed prompts, it successfully ranked products based on the reliability of their domestic-origin labels and later admitted its first response had been "overly cautious"2

2

. When asked why it failed to flag suspicious Made in USA claims proactively, Sparky cited limited FTC enforcement against retailers, calling it "a business calculation, not a legal justification"1

1

.

Technical Capability Exists But Goes Unused

The Columbia Law School study conducted by researchers Erie Meyer and Zachary Harris found that both Amazon and Walmart possess the technical capability to detect and flag fraudulent 'made in USA' claims4

4

. Despite this capability, the companies actively choose not to police this fraud, allowing misleading product claims to persist on their platforms4

4

. This represents a critical failure in consumer protection, particularly as AI chatbots increasingly mediate the shopping experience between consumers and product listings. The concern extends beyond whether country-of-origin information exists on retailer websites to whether AI systems can accurately find and present that information when shoppers request it2

2

.

Implications for American Manufacturing and Consumer Trust

Baldwin emphasized the competitive disadvantage these AI chatbot practices create for domestic manufacturers. "If Americans want to buy products made in America, Amazon and Walmart should be helping them, not giving away their business to foreign knockoffs," she stated2

2

. The senators argued that consumers seeking Made in USA products should be able to rely on accurate information when making purchasing decisions, and new technologies like AI chatbots must preserve that fairness4

4

. Erie Meyer, senior fellow at the Center for Law and the Economy and co-author of the report, noted the significance of bipartisan support, telling The Wall Street Journal that "seeing Sen. Baldwin and Sen. Scott sign the same letter gives me hope that supporting American businesses is still a bipartisan issue"2

2

.

Retailer Responses and Ongoing FTC Scrutiny

Amazon rejected suggestions that it deliberately withholds country-of-origin information, stating that it provides manufacturing location details when manufacturers or third-party sellers supply that data2

2

. The company emphasized that country-of-origin information appears on product detail pages when available and that it continues working to improve Alexa for Shopping's ability to provide this data5

5

. Walmart declined to comment on the matter2

2

. The Federal Trade Commission has previously warned both companies about origin claims made by third-party sellers, sending letters last year urging them to crack down on misleading Made in USA labeling1

1

.

Enforcement Landscape and Presidential Support

The FTC has actively enforced its Made in USA Labeling Rule since it took effect in 2021, bringing 11 enforcement actions under the Biden administration2

2

. These included a case resulting in a multimillion-dollar judgment against Williams-Sonoma. Enforcement measures have continued under the Trump administration, which issued an executive order in March calling for truthful advertising and suggesting the FTC require e-commerce platforms to develop procedures for verifying country-of-origin claims from third-party sellers2

2

. The agency prosecuted fraud claims under this executive order against TouchTunes Music Company, Americana Liberty, Three Nations, and Oak Street Manufacturing Company in April4

4

. Baldwin and Scott urged the Commission to consider additional enforcement measures to deter such behavior following a robust investigation1

1

.