Workers Fearing AI Replacement Show Worse Workplace Behavior, New Study Reveals

AI Job Fear Triggers Workplace Misconduct Across Industries

Workers who fear AI replacement are increasingly exhibiting counterproductive workplace behaviors, according to a Washington State University study published in Occupational Health Science1

1

. The research, led by Tahira M. Probst, a professor of psychology at WSU Vancouver, examined employees across 18 industries and found that AI-driven job insecurity directly correlates with behaviors ranging from slacking off to stealing coworker lunches2

2

.

The study reveals that workers who fear AI replacement engage in moral disengagement, a psychological process where employees justify behaviors they would normally consider inappropriate3

3

. This manifests as surfing the web during work hours, arriving late for shifts, or undermining colleagues. "Moral disengagement is basically a way of justifying bad behavior," Probst explained. "We know what's right and wrong. We know what organizational policies say we can and can't do. Moral disengagement is a way of reframing that behavior as something that is acceptable"1

1

.

Finance and Insurance Workers Face Highest AI Exposure

Using the AI Industry Exposure index, researchers identified which industries face the most potential disruption from AI automation potential. Workers in finance and insurance demonstrated the highest levels of AI exposure, while those in agriculture, forestry, and construction showed the least vulnerability2

2

. The counterproductive workplace behaviors were significantly more pronounced in high-exposure industries, suggesting a direct relationship between AI adoption in the workplace and employee misconduct.

The research distinguishes between job insecurity and occupation insecurity. "If you're a bartender and the bar that you're working for goes under, you can get another job as a bartender somewhere else," Probst noted. "That profession is not going away. That's not necessarily the case with occupations that are affected by AI. If you're in a profession like medical transcriptionists, for example, where a lot of that coding and transcription can now be fully automated, that's not something where if you are let go, you can just go find work in another organization"1

1

.

Organizational Impacts Extend Beyond Bottom Line

The workplace behavior deterioration creates cascading organizational impacts that extend beyond financial metrics. "Counterproductive workplace behaviors are harmful to the interpersonal relationships within an organization," Probst emphasized. "If you're not showing up, that puts more work on your coworkers. If you're doing things that impact your ability or your coworkers' ability to get their work done properly, or if you're wasting organizational resources, there's a lot of potential harm to an organization, not just to the bottom line, but to the effective functioning of the organization"1

1

.

When employees feel their occupation is at risk, they rationalize unethical actions such as cutting corners or undermining others as necessary self-protection or compensation for perceived injustice3

3

. This pattern mirrors behaviors seen in employees who mentally disengage from jobs they expect to leave or relationships they view as doomed.

What Employers Should Watch For

The study suggests AI concerns harm both workers and businesses, recommending employers pay careful attention to how they discuss and implement AI technologies. Companies should ensure employees remain engaged and supported during AI adoption in the workplace transitions1

1

. The research team, which included Rebecca Lindgren, a graduate student in psychology at WSU Vancouver, along with researchers from Italy and Belgium, highlights the need for proactive communication strategies that address worker fears about AI automation potential before absenteeism and moral disengagement become widespread issues affecting team dynamics and productivity.