2 Sources
[1]
Xiaomi's new open source, agentic AI coding harness MiMo Code beats Claude Code at ultra-long, 200+ step tasks
Xiaomi's MiMo AI team has open-sourced MiMo Code V0.1.0, a terminal-native AI coding assistant that the Chinese electronics giant says outperforms Anthropic's Claude Code on key agentic coding benchmarks, especially on long-horizon, multi-step tasks (200+ steps) -- at least, according to its own
[2]
Xiaomi releases MiMo Code V0.1 as an open-source terminal AI coding assistant
Xiaomi has released MiMo Code V0.1 as an open-source terminal-native AI coding assistant for developers. It operates inside the terminal to read and write code, execute commands, manage Git operations, and maintain persistent project memory across sessions. The release includes MiMo V2.5, a
Share
Copy Link
Xiaomi has open-sourced MiMo Code V0.1.0, a terminal-native AI coding assistant that claims to beat Anthropic's Claude Code on complex, multi-step coding tasks exceeding 200 steps. The release includes free access to MiMo-V2.5, featuring a one-million-token context window, and introduces a cross-session memory system designed to solve AI coding agents' persistent amnesia problem.
Xiaomi's MiMo AI team announced the release of Xiaomi MiMo Code V0.1.0 on June 10, 2026, positioning this open source terminal-native AI coding assistant as a formidable Claude Code competitor. According to internal benchmarks and a survey involving 576 developers, the agentic AI coding harness outperforms Anthropic's Claude Code specifically on long-horizon, multi-step coding tasks exceeding 200 steps
1
. Available now on GitHub under an MIT license, the tool installs with a single terminal command on macOS and Linux, or via npm on Windows1
. The release bundles limited-time free access to MiMo-V2.5, Xiaomi's multimodal flagship model featuring a one-million-token context window that requires no registration to begin using1
.
Source: VentureBeat
The distinguishing feature of this AI coding assistant lies in its persistent project memory architecture, which addresses a critical weakness plaguing existing coding agents. As context windows fill during extended sessions, earlier decisions and conventions typically get compressed or lost entirely, forcing developers to repeatedly re-explain their projects. Xiaomi's approach deploys a cross-session memory system powered by SQLite FTS5 full-text search spanning four layers: project memory stored in a persistent file, session checkpoints, scratch notes, and per-task progress logs
1
. Rather than pausing the primary coding agent to take notes, the system employs an independent checkpoint-writer subagent that updates structured state in real time1
. When context limits approach, the system rebuilds the environment from these checkpoints with relevant context, maintaining operational momentum without information loss2
.Two self-improvement mechanisms enhance the system's capabilities over time. A "dream" command periodically reviews historical sessions roughly every seven days, deduplicating and compressing them into long-term memory
1
. The "distill" function mines past sessions for repeated workflows that can be automated, following approaches recently adopted by OpenAI and Anthropic1
. The multi-agent system supports build, plan, and compose modes, with the compose mode following a structured workflow from specifications through planning, execution, debugging, testing, verification, and merging2
. Subagents can be created for parallel tasks with full lifecycle management and tree-structured task tracking2
.Related Stories
According to figures published by Xiaomi, MiMo Code paired with MiMo-V2.5-Pro achieved 82% on SWE-bench Verified versus Claude Code with Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 79%, 62% versus 55% on SWE-bench Pro, and 73% versus 69% on Terminal Bench 2
1
. The harness itself contributes measurably to performance: running the same MiMo-V2.5-Pro model in both harnesses, MiMo Code scored 62% on SWE-bench Pro versus 57% for Claude Code, attributing roughly five points purely to the agent system1
. Xiaomi conducted a human double-blind A/B evaluation during internal beta with 576 developers working in 474 real private repositories, producing 1,213 judged head-to-head pairs against Claude Code1
. However, comparisons against OpenAI's Codex or Google's Gemini CLI were notably absent, with the official Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard showing OpenAI's Codex CLI running GPT-5.5 at 82.2%, roughly nine points above MiMo Code's self-reported 73%1
.Built as a fork of the open-source OpenCode agent, MiMo Code extends it with memory architecture, workflow modes, and model harness capabilities
1
. The system supports multiple model providers including Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepSeek, Kimi, and GLM, with Claude Code compatibility that automatically loads skills, MCP servers, and commands2
. Additional features include voice input powered by MiMo-V2.5-ASR for speech-based prompts and an experimental Max Mode for parallel best-of-N reasoning with judge selection2
. Developers can configure onboarding through MiMo Auto with zero configuration and anonymous access, Xiaomi MiMo Platform via OAuth login, one-step migration from Claude Code, or custom OpenAI-compatible API providers2
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
22 Sept 2026•Technology

17 Apr 2025•Technology

30 Apr 2025•Technology

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
