Seven in 10 Americans oppose AI data centers in their communities, new Gallup poll reveals

Public Opposition to AI Data Centers Reaches Critical Levels

A newly released Gallup poll has exposed intense public resistance to AI data centers, with 71% of Americans opposing data center construction in their local communities1

1

. The survey, which marks the first time Gallup has investigated attitudes toward these facilities, found that nearly half of respondents—48%—are strongly opposed to having AI infrastructure near their homes4

4

. Only 7% of Americans expressed strong support for local data center construction, highlighting a significant disconnect between tech industry ambitions and community acceptance2

2

.

This public opposition comes at a time when companies like Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, and Google are racing to build AI infrastructure at unprecedented speed. Data center construction has surged 228% since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 20225

5

, reflecting the explosive demand for compute power needed to train and run large language models and other AI applications.

Environmental Impact Drives Community Concerns

The Gallup survey identified environmental impact as the primary driver of opposition, with Americans particularly concerned about electricity and water consumption. Half of those opposing data centers cited effects on resource consumption, including power grid constraints, water use, and deforestation2

2

. These concerns are grounded in reality—a recent investigation found that a Georgia data center used 30 million gallons of water without initially paying for its usage1

1

.

One particularly controversial proposal in Utah, the $100 billion Stratos Project backed partly by Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary, would be twice the size of Manhattan and require more electrical power than the entire state currently uses1

1

. Local residents have pushed back against claims that the project would create 10,000 jobs, with protesters challenging O'Leary's characterization of their opposition.

Goldman Sachs estimates global data center electricity demand could rise 220% by 20305

5

, underscoring the scale of energy infrastructure required to support AI expansion. This projection has sparked calls for more energy-efficient measures to mitigate the heavy environmental footprint of AI infrastructure.

Quality-of-Life Issues and Local Community Concerns Mount

Beyond environmental considerations, Americans oppose data centers due to quality-of-life issues that directly affect their daily lives. Twenty-two percent of survey respondents cited concerns about property values, health impacts, traffic congestion, and the substantial space these facilities occupy2

2

. Noise pollution has emerged as a particularly contentious issue, with 16% of opponents mentioning air, water, light, and heat pollution as reasons for their opposition.

Utility bills have become a flashpoint in communities hosting data centers. Electricity costs have soared in some areas due to the vast power requirements of these facilities, though some tech companies have pledged to mitigate price increases2

2

. In a stark example of this challenge, residents of Lake Tahoe in Nevada and California face uncertainty about their power supply after their current provider decided to focus on serving data centers instead, leaving the community without a clear energy source as of May 20272

2

.

SpaceX's AI division recently added natural gas turbines to a Mississippi data center despite facing a lawsuit over alleged violations of the Clean Air Act2

2

, illustrating how AI infrastructure expansion can clash with environmental regulations and local community concerns.

Moratoriums and Legislative Action Gain Momentum

The intensity of public opposition has translated into concrete political action, with moratoriums and legislative measures gaining traction across the country. In April, the Maine Legislature became the first in the U.S. to pass a bill barring the development of large-scale data centers, though Governor Janet Mills later vetoed it4

4

5

5

. The state still moved forward with plans to study the sector's impact on infrastructure and energy systems.

The council of Monterey Park in Los Angeles County, California recently enacted a ban on new data centers within city limits2

2

. New York state lawmakers have proposed a three-year moratorium on new data centers, and efforts are underway at the federal level for a nationwide pause2

2

. A Wisconsin city approved a referendum to give voters greater say on major tax-funded projects following local data center campus construction4

4

.

Economic Benefits Fail to Sway Most Americans

While 55% of those supporting data centers cited job creation and 66% mentioned broader economic benefits2

2

, these arguments have failed to convince the majority of Americans. A Brookings report studying employment effects found that data centers can create new jobs, but the employment potential is vastly overestimated by local governments and AI companies1

1

. Unlike factories, data centers operate more like warehouses for computers running on expensive chips, with many associated jobs being temporary during the buildout phase.

Interestingly, opposition to AI data centers exceeds opposition to nuclear power plants—53% of Americans oppose having a nuclear power plant in their area1

1

3

3

, suggesting that concerns about AI infrastructure have surpassed traditional anxieties about nuclear energy.

The Gallup survey, conducted from March 2 to 18 with 1,000 respondents and a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points4

4

, found that Democrats were more likely than Republicans to strongly oppose nearby data centers, while women registered higher levels of strong opposition than men5

5

. As Counterpoint Research estimates the global data center CPU market could expand to roughly $80 billion by 20285

5

, the tension between AI expansion and local community acceptance shows no signs of abating.