2 Sources
[1]
Students Are Learning Less and Getting Higher Grades Because of AI, Study Finds
The booming use of generative AI by students is leading to rising grade inflation at universities, according to a working paper published this week by the University of California, Berkeley. There are three ways generative AI can be used by students: augmentation, where the tools perform a
[2]
AI sends A grades into overdrive
Why it matters: Universities and colleges were already concerned about how many students are earning A's and B's, but now must worry that graduates are leaving AI-proficient rather than knowledgeable about their subjects of study. The big picture: It isn't a case where A- students get a slight
Share
Copy Link
A UC Berkeley study analyzing over 500,000 student enrollments reveals that AI sends A grades into overdrive, with excellent grades rising 30% in AI-exposed courses since ChatGPT's release. While students achieve higher GPAs through AI-assisted cheating, researchers warn this trend creates a less competent workforce unable to perform core job duties.
The widespread use of generative AI is fundamentally reshaping how students perform academically, according to a working paper from the
University of California, Berkeley
. UC Berkeley senior researcher Igor Chirikov analyzed over 500,000 student-course enrollments across 84 departments at a large Texas university from 2018 to 2025, uncovering a troubling pattern: students are achieving significantly higher grades while potentially acquiring fewer actual skills. The research identifies three distinct ways students deploy these tools—augmentation for research support, reinstatement of AI-based tasks, or complete displacement where AI automates work like essay writing. Only the first two methods correlate with genuine learning, yet displacement remains widespread in unsupervised environments.
Source: Gizmodo
Since
ChatGPT
launched in 2022, AI-exposed courses experienced a 30 percent increase in "A" grades, with the most pronounced effects appearing in classes involvingwriting and coding tasks
. "We have a C student who is now an A student,"Chirikov told Axios
, emphasizing this isn't merely marginal improvement. Meanwhile, courses less susceptible to AI assistance—such as sculpture and lab-based work—saw grades remain flat, providing clear evidence that AI-assisted cheating drives these academic gains. The pattern becomes especially pronounced in courses where take-home assignments carry significant weight compared to proctored exams, oral presentations, or in-class discussions.Four years into the AI era, universities have yet to develop effective responses to grade inflation. Chirikov deliberately avoided naming the Texas research university in his
UC Berkeley study
, explaining "I don't want to single out one university, just because I believe it's not specific to that particular university. It's something that's happening across the higher ed sector." The challenge extends beyond student behavior—faculty sometimes face incentives to grade more leniently since student evaluations often influence promotions. AtPrinceton
, where roughly 30% of seniors admitted to cheating mostly via generative AI in a recent survey, faculty voted this week to overturn a 133-year-oldhonor code
that allowed students to take in-person exams without faculty proctoring.
Source: Axios
Related Stories
The implications extend far beyond campus boundaries. "If AI displaces skill-building tasks during learning, students may graduate with weaker capabilities in precisely the domains where AI is strongest, reinforcing a feedback loop between AI in education and AI in production that could accelerate automation,"
Chirikov writes
. This creates a paradox: graduates enter workplaces unable to perform core duties, driving increased workplace AI dependence and potentially accelerating job automation. Employers will struggle to identifystrong graduates
when inflated GPAs no longer signal actual competency, making hiring decisions increasingly difficult in a job market already strained by AI displacement.Chirikov acknowledges there's no "silver bullet" to address AI and grade inflation at universities. "We need to be creative and think of
AI-integrated assignments
, and that students can use [LLMs], but they should properly document that,"he told Axios
. "That's not an easy process, but we definitely should invest in that more than we do right now." Some professors have already implemented creative countermeasures, requiring handwritten or oral exams to verify authentic student knowledge. The research suggests that while AI exacerbates existing grade inflation trends dating to the early 2000s, the speed and scale of change demands immediate attention. What remains uncertain is whether academic institutions can adapt quickly enough to preserve educational integrity while preparing students for an AI-integrated professional world.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
12 Sept 2025•Technology

03 Dec 2025•Entertainment and Society

09 Jul 2026•Entertainment and Society

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
