2 Sources
[1]
Apple Responds to Lawsuit Filed by Three YouTube Channels
Earlier this year, three YouTube channels sued Apple, alleging that the company violated the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by unlawfully accessing and scraping millions of copyrighted YouTube videos to train its AI models. In a class action lawsuit filed with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in April, the owners of the YouTube channels h3h3Productions, MrShortGame Golf, and Golfholics allege that Apple "deliberately circumvented" YouTube's protections against video scraping and "profited substantially" by doing so. Apple's actions were "not only unlawful, but an unconscionable attack on the community of content creators whose content is used to fuel the multi-trillion-dollar generative AI industry without any compensation," the complaint alleged. h3h3Productions is a well-known YouTube channel created by Ethan Klein and Hila Klein, and they later created the H3 Podcast. Their channels have millions of followers, while MrShortGame Golf and Golfholics have hundreds of thousands of followers. The channels filed equivalent lawsuits against Meta, Nvidia, ByteDance, and Snap. Apple responded to the lawsuit this week, according to a court document viewed by MacRumors. In short, Apple said the plaintiffs made the videos publicly available on YouTube and that it was permitted to access the videos under the DMCA. Apple said YouTube's Terms of Service likewise permitted the company to access the videos. "Plaintiffs allege that they posted audiovisual works to YouTube, and that any member of the public can see them there," reads Apple's response. "No password. No payment. No lock. No key. Allegedly, YouTube employs technological measures to prevent unauthorized downloading. But because YouTube provides public access to the videos, the alleged technological measures do not control access to the works, as § 1201(a) requires." Apple said the plaintiffs have ultimately failed to state a claim, and it requested that the court dismiss the lawsuit as a result.
[2]
AppleInsider.com
Apple is asking a federal court to dismiss the YouTuber AI training lawsuit, on the grounds that publicly available YouTube videos are lawfully accessible under both the DMCA and YouTube's Terms of Service. In April 2026, a collection of YouTube channels sued Apple, claiming the company had scraped videos from YouTube to train internal AI models. The class-action lawsuit was headed up by Ted Entertainment, owners of the h3h3Productions channels and podcast. Two golf channels, MrShortGameGolf and Golfholics, were also involved. Apple has responded three months later to the suit. According to the court document spotted by MacRumors, Apple argued that the plaintiffs made the videos publicly available on YouTube, and that both the DMCA and YouTube's Terms of Service permitted the company to access them. "Plaintiffs allege that they posted audiovisual works to YouTube, and that any member of the public can see them there," reads Apple's response. "No password. No payment. No lock. No key. Allegedly, YouTube employs technological measures to prevent unauthorized downloading. But because YouTube provides public access to the videos, the alleged technological measures do not control access to the works, as section 1201(a) requires." Apple is requesting the court throw out the lawsuit as the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim.
Share
Copy Link
Apple has filed a motion to dismiss a class-action lawsuit alleging the company scraped millions of YouTube videos to train its AI models. The tech giant argues that publicly accessible content doesn't require special authorization under DMCA law, setting up a legal battle that could define how AI companies use online content for training purposes.
Apple has formally responded to a class-action lawsuit filed earlier this year by three YouTube channels, arguing that publicly available videos on the platform can be legally accessed for AI training purposes. The lawsuit, filed in April with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accused Apple of violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act by scraping millions of copyrighted videos without authorization
2
.
Source: MacRumors
The plaintiffs—h3h3Productions, MrShortGame Golf, and Golfholics—allege that Apple "deliberately circumvented" YouTube's protections against video scraping and "profited substantially" from the unauthorized use of content. h3h3Productions, created by Ethan Klein and Hila Klein, has millions of followers, while the golf channels have hundreds of thousands of subscribers. These content creators characterized Apple's actions as "an unconscionable attack on the community of content creators whose content is used to fuel the multi-trillion-dollar generative AI industry without any compensation"
1
.In its motion to dismiss filed this week, Apple responds to lawsuit claims by asserting that the plaintiffs made their videos publicly accessible and that both the DMCA and YouTube's Terms of Service permitted the company to access them. "Plaintiffs allege that they posted audiovisual works to YouTube, and that any member of the public can see them there," Apple's response states. "No password. No payment. No lock. No key"
1
.The company's legal argument hinges on a technical interpretation of DMCA Section 1201(a), which addresses circumvention of technological measures that control access to copyrighted works. Apple contends that while YouTube may employ technological measures to prevent unauthorized downloading, these measures don't actually control access to the works themselves since the publicly available videos can be viewed by anyone without restrictions
2
.
Source: AppleInsider
Related Stories
This legal battle extends beyond Apple, as the same YouTube channels have filed equivalent lawsuits against Meta, Nvidia, ByteDance, and Snap, signaling a coordinated effort by content creators to challenge how tech companies use online content for AI training
1
. The outcome could establish critical precedents for how generative AI companies source training data and whether publicly accessible content can be used without explicit creator consent or compensation.Apple is requesting the court dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the plaintiffs have failed to state a valid claim under the DMCA violation allegations. The case raises fundamental questions about the balance between protecting creator rights and enabling AI development through access to publicly shared content. As AI companies increasingly face scrutiny over their training practices, this lawsuit could influence future regulations governing data usage in the AI industry and potentially reshape how content creators monetize their work in the age of machine learning.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
