9 Sources
[1]
Apple Gets Hit With AI Copyright Lawsuit Days Before iPhone 17 Event
Two authors, Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson, are suing Apple, alleging the company violated their copyright protections and illegally acquired and used their books to train its AI, according to a complaint filed Friday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California in San
[2]
Apple Sued Over Alleged Use of Pirated Books for AI Training
Don't miss out on our latest stories. Add PCMag as a preferred source on Google. Apple is the latest tech company to get sued over alleged use of pirated books for AI training. As Reuters reports, in a lawsuit filed in the federal court in Northern California, authors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer
[3]
Apple sued by authors over use of books in AI training
Sept 5 (Reuters) - Technology giant Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab was accused by authors in a lawsuit on Friday of illegally using their copyrighted books to help train its artificial intelligence systems, part of an expanding legal fight over protections for intellectual property in the AI
[4]
Apple faces lawsuit over alleged use of pirated books for AI training
Two authors have filed a lawsuit against Apple, accusing the company of infringing on their copyright by using their books to train its artificial intelligence model without their consent. The plaintiffs, Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson, claimed that Apple used a dataset of pirated copyrighted
[5]
Apple accused of illegally training AI models on pirated books - 9to5Mac
A new proposed class action suit was filed in the federal court in Northern California today, accusing Apple of illegally using books to train its AI models. Here are the details. As reported by Reuters, authors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Robertson are accusing Apple of using a pirated dataset, in
[6]
After Anthropic and Midjourney, Now Apple Faces Copyright Lawsuit Over AI
The plaintiffs are asking for a jury trial and monetary damages A fresh lawsuit was filed against Apple on Friday over allegedly training its artificial intelligence (AI) on copyrighted books. Two authors have alleged that the Cupertino-based tech giant used datasets containing pirated versions of
[7]
Apple Faces Class-Action Lawsuit Over Reported Use Of Copyrighted Books To Train AI - Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN)
Apple Inc. AAPL was hit with a class-action lawsuit on Friday alleging the tech giant illegally used copyrighted books without permission to train its artificial intelligence systems. Authors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson filed the complaint in Northern California federal court, claiming
[8]
Apple Faces Copyright Lawsuit For AI Training On Pirated Books
Two book authors are asking for the destruction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models that tech giant Apple trained on copyrighted material, as part of a lawsuit in the US Court for the Northern District of California. The proposed class action lawsuit accuses the tech company of training Apple
[9]
Apple sued by authors over use of books in AI training
(Reuters) -Technology giant Apple was accused by authors in a lawsuit on Friday of illegally using their copyrighted books to help train its artificial intelligence systems, part of an expanding legal fight over protections for intellectual property in the AI era. The proposed class action, filed
Share
Copy Link
Apple is being sued by authors for allegedly using pirated books to train its AI models without permission or compensation, joining other tech giants in the ongoing debate over AI and copyright.
Apple, the tech giant, has been hit with a copyright infringement lawsuit just days before its highly anticipated iPhone 17 event. Authors Grady Hendrix and Jennifer Roberson filed a complaint in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that Apple illegally acquired and used their books to train its artificial intelligence (AI) models without consent or compensation
1
2
.
Source: Reuters
The lawsuit claims that Apple used a software program called Applebot to scrape data from "shadow libraries" like Books3, a dataset of over 196,000 pirated books
1
3
. The authors assert that their novels were included in this pirated library and subsequently used to develop Apple's AI without their permission or any attempt at compensation2
.According to the complaint, "Apple has not attempted to pay these authors. Apple did not seek licenses to copy and use the copyrighted books provided to its models. Instead, it intentionally evaded payment by using books already compiled in pirated datasets"
1
.This lawsuit is part of a growing trend of legal challenges faced by tech companies developing AI models. The use of copyrighted material for AI training has become a contentious issue, with creators fighting to ensure their rights are protected and that they have the option to opt out of having their work used for AI training
1
4
.Similar lawsuits have been filed against other tech giants:
1
5
.3
.2
.Tech companies are arguing for fair use exceptions, a legal concept in copyright law that allows for the use of copyrighted content without permission under certain circumstances
1
. However, creators are pushing back, insisting that AI companies should not be allowed to ignore established copyright law precedents simply to avoid paying licensing fees1
.Related Stories
Apple released its AI last year during its annual WWDC developers conference but has had a relatively slow entrance into the AI race compared to competitors like Samsung, Google, and Motorola
1
. The lawsuit comes at a crucial time for Apple, just days before its annual fall event where the iPhone 17 is expected to be unveiled1
.
Source: CNET
Given the potential scale of the infringement, the plaintiffs have requested the court to turn their complaint into a class action. They are seeking to block Apple from further infringement and obtain compensation for monetary damages
2
4
.
Source: Gadgets 360
As the AI industry continues to evolve rapidly, this lawsuit against Apple highlights the ongoing tension between technological innovation and intellectual property rights. The outcome of this case, along with similar lawsuits against other tech companies, could have significant implications for the future of AI development and the rights of content creators.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
