Danny Boyle Admits Using AI in Film Ink to Animate Photos and Create CGI Animals

Danny Boyle Confirms AI Use in Ink at Telluride Film Festival

Director Danny Boyle has openly acknowledged using generative AI in his latest film Ink, a biographical drama about media mogul Rupert Murdoch's acquisition of British tabloid The Sun1

1

. Speaking at the Telluride Film Festival in Colorado, the acclaimed British filmmaker behind 28 Days Later and Slumdog Millionaire revealed that approximately 30 seconds of AI-generated content appears in the movie2

2

. The disclosure, which also appears in Ink's credits, marks a rare instance of transparency in Hollywood regarding the use of AI in filmmaking.

AI to Animate Photos and Create AI-Generated Animals

Boyle specified two primary applications of generative AI in Ink. The technology was deployed to animate old photographs, reportedly including images of former U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the Kray brothers, bringing historical imagery to life for the late-1960s and early-1970s setting1

1

. Additionally, AI-generated animals were created for the film, specifically mice running around The Sun's newsroom. Boyle explained this choice stems from a previous encounter with PETA after using real chimpanzees in 28 Days Later. "They wrote to me and said 'you must never do that again,' and I haven't," Boyle told Vanity Fair, adding that he has since relied on CGI animals3

3

. "AI is very very good at creating animals," he emphasized.

Boyle Defends AI as a Useful Tool with Ethical Considerations

Addressing the broader debate about the use of AI in filmmaking, Boyle positioned the technology as "a very useful tool, in many ways, provided you use it respectfully, and provided you pay actors if you're going to replace them with some kind of AI embodiments," comparing it to animation projects or part of the VFX toolbox2

2

. When asked about his perspective on AI, the director deflected somewhat, stating, "It doesn't really matter what I think about AI, it matters what 20 year olds think about it is the honest truth"1

1

. However, his emphasis on respectful use and fair compensation for actors suggests an awareness of the ethical considerations surrounding AI in creative industries.

Industry Backlash and Questions About VFX Artists

The revelation has triggered significant backlash from audiences and industry observers. Critics have questioned why Boyle couldn't employ traditional VFX studios and human visual effects artists to achieve the same results for animating old photographs or building CGI animals2

2

. Notably, while Boyle emphasized the need to compensate actors replaced by AI, he did not address whether VFX artists potentially displaced by generative AI received similar consideration. Fans have expressed disappointment on social media, with comments ranging from "THIS TAKE SUCKS. MAKE REAL THINGS" to "We will be skipping this one!"3

3

. Many pointed out that 3D animators possess the skills to create high-quality CGI animals and effects, questioning whether using generative AI simply circumvents their expertise.

Implications for Hollywood's Approach to AI Transparency

Boyle's candid admission stands in stark contrast to many in Hollywood who refuse to disclose AI use in their productions1

1

. This transparency, while potentially controversial, sets a precedent that could influence how the film industry approaches AI disclosure moving forward. As Ink prepares for its U.S. theatrical release on December 11 and its Netflix and UK cinema debut on January 8, the conversation around responsible AI integration in filmmaking continues to evolve. The film, which premiered at both the Venice and Telluride Film Festivals and stars Jack O'Connell as Sun newspaper editor Larry Lamb alongside Guy Pearce as Rupert Murdoch, now serves as a test case for audience acceptance of disclosed AI use in major productions.