3 Sources
[1]
Derbyshire Police officer accused of using AI to 'create evidence'
Police have launched a criminal investigation into an officer accused of using artificial intelligence (AI) systems to "create evidential material in a number of cases". The Derbyshire Police officer has been removed from frontline duties, pending the outcome of the investigation, said the force. The officer is alleged to have perverted the course of justice, but no arrests have been made, said police. A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said they were working with police, adding: "We are engaging with defence teams and the courts in appropriate cases." They added: "As police inquiries continue, it would not be appropriate to comment further." Derbyshire Police said: "A criminal investigation has been launched into an allegation of perverting the course of justice after the alleged use of AI systems by an officer to create evidential material in a number of cases. "The force is working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to any potentially impacted cases, however, the investigation is in its early stages, so no further details are available. "The officer involved has been removed from frontline duties, pending the outcome of the investigation. No arrests have been made." It comes in the same week that a new national centre for AI in policing, called PoliceAI, was established. At the launch on Wednesday, PoliceAI interim director Alex Murray said: "Crime and technology are evolving rapidly. "Policing must keep pace by adopting AI responsibly to catch criminals and keep people safe." Listen to BBC Radio Derby on Sounds and follow BBC Derby on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to [email protected] or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
[2]
Police officer under criminal investigation over alleged use of AI
Unidentified officer removed from frontline duties in the first known case of its kind in the UK A police officer is under criminal investigation over the alleged use of artificial intelligence and has been removed from frontline duties in the first known case of its kind in the UK. The officer, who has not been named, is being investigated over allegations of using the technology to "create evidential material in a number of cases" and perverting the course of justice. Derbyshire police told the Financial Times: "A criminal investigation has been launched into an allegation of perverting the course of justice after the alleged use of AI systems by an officer to create evidential material in a number of cases. "The force is working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service in relation to any potentially impacted cases." The force added the investigation was "in its early stages" and no further details were available. It said: "The officer involved has been removed from frontline duties, pending the outcome of the investigation. No arrests have been made." The officer's role or the exact nature of the suspected misconduct has not been disclosed. A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson said in a statement to the Guardian: "We are working with Derbyshire police as it conducts enquiries into the alleged use of artificial intelligence by an officer. "We are engaging with defence teams and the courts in appropriate cases. "As police enquiries continue, it would not be appropriate to comment further." The investigation comes after Alex Murray, head of the National Police Chiefs' Council's Police AI centre, revealed it had told a number of police forces to stop using AI systems to prepare court statements and other tasks because they might not be reliable enough. In April, the Metropolitan police launched investigations into hundreds of officers after using an AI tool built by the US tech company Palantir to root out rogue officers. The software was deployed by the Met over the course of a week, surveilling staff members using data the force has ready access to, unearthing rule-breaking ranging from work-from-home violations to suspected corruption and criminal allegations such as rape. The Met said as a result of the software, evidence had been found tying a small number of officers to serious cases of misconduct and criminality, resulting in the arrest of three officers for offences including abuse of authority for sexual purposes, fraud, sexual assault, misconduct in public office and misuse of police systems.
[3]
Derbyshire police officer investigated for using AI to 'create evidence' in multiple cases
The officer has been taken off frontline duties pending the outcome of the investigation. A Derbyshire police officer is being investigated over accusations they used AI to "create evidence". The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said it was working with Derbyshire Police to investigate the use of AI by an officer. The officer is accused of using the technology to create evidence in a "number of cases", according to Derbyshire Police. The CPS said it is "engaging with" defence teams and courts which may have been affected by the alleged conduct. The officer has been taken off frontline duties pending the outcome of the investigation, and no arrests have been made. This comes after PoliceAI, a national centre for AI in policing, was launched this week. At the launch on Wednesday, PoliceAI interim director Alex Murray said: "Crime and technology are evolving rapidly. "Policing must keep pace by adopting AI responsibly to catch criminals and keep people safe." Read more from Sky News: Three teens arrested after man dies in park Man arrested after girl, 17, stabbed in neck Earlier this year, the West Midlands police chief was forced to apologise after it was revealed his officers relied on false information supplied by AI when deciding to ban fans of an Israeli football club from attending a match against Aston Villa in Birmingham. Maccabi Tel Aviv fans were barred from travelling to the game by the local Safety Advisory Group (SAG), which cited safety concerns based on advice from the police force. This included a reference by the force to a fictional match, fabricated by AI, between the Israeli club and West Ham United.
Share
Copy Link
A Derbyshire Police officer is under criminal investigation for allegedly using artificial intelligence to create evidential material in multiple cases. The officer has been removed from frontline duties and faces allegations of perverting the course of justice. This marks the first known case of its kind in the UK, highlighting growing concerns about AI reliability in policing.
A Derbyshire Police officer is now the subject of a criminal investigation after allegations emerged that they used artificial intelligence to create evidential material in multiple cases
1
. The police officer under criminal investigation has been removed from frontline duties pending the outcome of inquiries into what authorities describe as using AI to create false evidence2
. This represents the first known case of its kind in the UK, raising urgent questions about the misuse of AI in law enforcement and the safeguards needed to prevent such incidents.
Source: Sky News
The unidentified officer is alleged to have committed perverting the course of justice, though no arrests have been made at this early stage of the investigation
1
. Derbyshire Police confirmed they are working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service to identify and address any potentially impacted cases3
. A Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson stated they are "engaging with defence teams and the courts in appropriate cases," though declined to comment further while police inquiries continue2
.The investigation surfaces just as concerns mount over AI in policing applications across the UK. Alex Murray, head of the National Police Chiefs' Council's Police AI centre, recently revealed that several police forces had been instructed to stop using AI systems to prepare court statements and other tasks due to questions about their reliability
2
. The timing is particularly striking given that a new national centre for AI in policing, called PoliceAI, was established this same week1
.
Source: BBC
At the PoliceAI launch on Wednesday, interim director Alex Murray emphasized that "crime and technology are evolving rapidly" and that "policing must keep pace by adopting AI responsibly to catch criminals and keep people safe"
3
. Yet this investigation exposes the legal and ethical risks when AI tools are deployed without adequate oversight or when officers misuse them to manufacture rather than analyze evidence.This case follows other troubling incidents involving AI in law enforcement. In April, the Metropolitan Police launched investigations into hundreds of officers after deploying an AI tool built by Palantir to identify rogue officers
2
. The software surveilled staff members using readily available data, uncovering misconduct ranging from work-from-home violations to suspected corruption and criminal allegations including rape. Three officers were arrested for offences including abuse of authority for sexual purposes, fraud, and misuse of police systems2
.Earlier this year, West Midlands Police faced scrutiny when officers relied on false information supplied by AI when deciding to ban fans of Israeli football club Maccabi Tel Aviv from attending a match against Aston Villa in Birmingham
3
. The police force referenced a fictional match fabricated by AI between the Israeli club and West Ham United, forcing the West Midlands police chief to apologize for the error.Related Stories
The implications extend beyond one officer's alleged misconduct. Defence teams may now scrutinize evidence in cases where this Derbyshire Police officer was involved, potentially challenging convictions or ongoing prosecutions. The exact nature of the suspected misconduct and the officer's role have not been disclosed, leaving uncertainty about how many cases might be affected
2
. As forces across the UK integrate AI tools for tasks ranging from predictive policing to administrative functions, this investigation serves as a stark reminder that technology designed to enhance law enforcement can be weaponized to undermine justice itself. Observers will be watching closely to see whether this case prompts stricter protocols around AI deployment and whether other forces conduct audits of their own AI usage.Summarized by
Navi
24 Feb 2026•Policy and Regulation

24 Sept 2024

14 Jan 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Business and Economy

3
Health
