2 Sources
[1]
Cops Caught Using AI to Edit Picture of Pathetic Drug Bust
Can't-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech After giddy business executives, cops are emerging as some of the AI industry's most devoted disciples. Police officers are increasingly using AI-integrated tools on the job, though not without courting significant controversy. The error-prone nature of large language models has left law enforcement operations in a scramble, resulting in hallucinated police reports, evidence fabricated with generative AI, and even incidents of stalking via AI-integrated surveillance cameras. The most recent example comes out of Vancouver, where police set off a firestorm after publishing an image of a drug bust labeled "made with AI" on X-formerly-Twitter. According to Canada's CTV News, the original image depicted an unimpressive haul of petty cash and dime-bag quantities of various drugs. At a glance, nothing in the image seems doctored as the "made with AI" label seems to suggest. On closer look, however, the spread of dollar bills clearly show $50 bills labeled as $20s, while a $100 bill reads as "00." Asked by CTV why they used AI to manipulate the image, Vancouver's sergeant Adam Donalson wrote that "we used software to edit out the names of the accused" -- a confusing response, given that the original image showed the contraband arranged on a plank of cardboard and labeled with sharpie. If Vancouver PD meant to publicize their paltry spread online, why include the names of the accused in the first place? Donalson further explained that the AI picture "has been taken down and replaced with the original photo that has been cropped to exclude the names of the accused," making the whole situation even more convoluted. Given that other cops have used AI images to falsify evidence like this, Vancouverites weren't thrilled to see their own police toying around with the tech, even if just to crop an image. "You showed an AI-generated image of fabricated evidence to the public, which includes potential jurors," one netizen fumed under the updated image. "This whole case is going to get thrown out." "Where's the AI photo you posted earlier?" another poster replied. "I like being lied to by the police, it's good for building trust!"
[2]
Vancouver Police Just Swapped Their AI-Edited Drug Bust Photos For New Ones, But The Skepticism Refuses To Die
If you are using AI to embellish your physical achievements, do make sure that you edit out the "made with AI" label, lest you appear hopelessly tech-illiterate. That's a lesson that Vancouver Police Department can now learn at its leisure following a scathing public backlash on one of its most recent AI-related antics. You can now add Vancouver PD to the list of entities that are using AI Slop to artificially enhance their achievements A few days back, Vancouver PD posted pictures of a supposed drug bust on various social media platforms. The pictures were notable not only due to the meagre stash of drugs on display but also because of a "made with AI" label that the department presumably forgot to remove, sparking a fierce public backlash. The department then issued a weird defense, conceding that "software" was used to "edit out the names of the accused." Interestingly, it was patently obvious at the time that much more was edited, especially as a few $50 bills were labelled as $20 ones in the original images. The Vancouver Police Department has now issued fresh images after deleting older ones. While these images do not contain the "made with AI" label, skepticism persists. Of course, it is not just the Police that is now apparently going big on AI slop. We reported recently that marketers were also doubling down on artificial intelligence, but with just 26 percent of the consumers surveyed showing any enthusiasm towards such content. Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.
Share
Copy Link
The Vancouver Police Department triggered public outrage after posting images of a drug bust marked "made with AI" on social media. The AI-edited photo showed currency mislabeled and raised concerns about fabricating evidence. Despite replacing the images and claiming AI was only used to remove names, skepticism persists about police using AI to manipulate official communications.
The Vancouver Police Department recently found itself at the center of controversy after publishing images of a drug bust on social media platforms that were clearly labeled "made with AI." The incident, first reported by Canada's CTV News, revealed an unimpressive haul of petty cash and small quantities of various drugs spread across cardboard
1
. What caught public attention wasn't just the modest nature of the bust, but the telltale watermark indicating AI-generated content that the VPD apparently forgot to remove before posting2
.Upon closer inspection, the AI-edited photo contained obvious errors. Several $50 bills were mislabeled as $20 bills, while a $100 bill displayed only "00" instead of the proper denomination
1
. These glaring mistakes highlighted the error-prone AI technology and raised immediate questions about why police would use such tools to alter images of evidence.
Source: Wccftech
The response from the public was swift and severe. Vancouver residents expressed alarm at seeing their police department manipulate images, even for seemingly minor reasons. "You showed an AI-generated image of fabricated evidence to the public, which includes potential jurors," one social media user wrote under the updated image. "This whole case is going to get thrown out"
1
. Another commenter sarcastically remarked, "Where's the AI photo you posted earlier? I like being lied to by the police, it's good for building trust!"1
.The incident adds Vancouver PD to a growing list of law enforcement agencies experimenting with AI in ways that undermine trust. Police officers are increasingly adopting AI-integrated tools on the job, though not without courting significant controversy. The technology has already resulted in hallucinated police reports, incidents of stalking via AI-integrated surveillance cameras, and cases where officers attempted to fabricate evidence using generative AI
1
.When questioned by CTV News about why they used AI to edit evidence, Vancouver's Sergeant Adam Donalson provided a confusing explanation. He stated that "we used software to edit out the names of the accused"
1
. This response puzzled observers, given that the original image showed contraband arranged on cardboard and labeled with sharpie, raising the question of why names would be included in the first place if the department intended to share the image publicly.Donalson further explained that the AI picture "has been taken down and replaced with the original photo that has been cropped to exclude the names of the accused"
1
. The Vancouver Police Department subsequently issued fresh images after deleting the older ones2
. While these replacement images do not contain the "made with AI" label, skepticism persists among the public about what exactly was altered and why AI tools were deemed necessary for such a simple task.
Source: Futurism
Related Stories
This incident raises critical questions about AI misuse in law enforcement and its potential impact on legal cases. When police departments use AI to manipulate images that could serve as evidence, they risk compromising entire investigations and prosecutions. The concern extends beyond this single drug bust to the broader pattern of law enforcement agencies adopting AI-integrated tools without clear guidelines or transparency about their use in official communications.
The Vancouver case exemplifies how error-prone AI can create problems even when used with seemingly innocent intent. After giddy business executives, cops are emerging as some of the AI industry's most devoted disciples
1
. However, the technology's tendency to produce hallucinated reports and fabricate details makes it particularly problematic in contexts where accuracy and trust are paramount. As AI-generated content becomes more prevalent across various sectors, the Vancouver Police Department's misstep serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of deploying such technology without proper oversight or consideration of public perception.🟡 Vance Police Department's misstep serves as a cautionary tale about the risks of deploying such technology without proper oversight or consideration of public perception.Summarized by
Navi
03 Jul 2025•Technology

13 Jun 2026•Policy and Regulation

10 Dec 2025•Technology

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
