2 Sources
[1]
EU seeks to 'intensify' talks with U.S. on advanced cyber AI models, official tells CNBC, amid Mythos concerns
The White House says it's working closely with AI labs to strike a balance between innovation and safety, as the U.S. seeks to preserve its lead over China in the global AI race. The European Union is looking to "intensify" discussions with the U.S. administration on the most advanced AI models, including those with "cyber capabilities," a Commission official told CNBC. Anthropic's powerful Mythos model, announced in April, sent governments and businesses into a frenzy, prompting a wave of concerns about AI-powered cyberattacks. That same month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the White House opposed Anthropic's plan to expand access to its powerful Mythos model. The White House says it's working closely with AI labs to strike a balance between innovation and safety, as the U.S. seeks to preserve its lead over China in the global AI race. Anthropic initially rolled out the model to a select group of companies and organisations in preview as part of an initiative called Project Glasswing. But the AI lab has yet to grant the EU, its AI office or any government organizations outside of the U.S., aside from the U.K.'s AI Security Institute, preview access to review it. The WSJ reported that Anthropic had proposed letting roughly 70 additional companies and organizations use Mythos, with administration officials opposing the move because of security concerns. "Cybersecurity is a shared priority and we have agreed to mutually recognise our respective standards in this area," Thomas Regnier, Commission spokesperson, told CNBC, referring to talks between the Commission and the U.S. administration. "In parallel we are now expanding technical discussions with Anthropic and other model developers which have notified their latest models to the AI office."
[2]
EU to talk with Anthropic over access to Mythos AI Model
The European Commission is sending representatives to San Francisco * The European Commission is lobbying to secure Mythos Preview access for EU firms * US officials recently blocked wider distribution citing security risks * Mythos Preview can surface decades‑old vulnerabilities and generate exploits at speed The European Commission (EC) is trying to secure access to Anthropic's AI model Mythos Preview for European companies and is sending emissaries across the pond to try and lobby for that outcome. Citing anonymous sources familiar with the matter, Bloomberg said that the EC is sending a few officials to San Francisco this week to meet with the representatives of Anthropic PBC to learn more about the tool, and to try and make it available to the bloc. The publication says the EU has been pushing for access ever since Anthropic first disclosed Project Glasswing, looking to test its networks, as well as those of EU banks, critical infrastructure firms, and tech companies. Apparently, Anthropic is also eager to expand the number of organizations that are part of the trial phase but is being held back by the US government. Project Glasswing is important "White House officials recently rejected Anthropic's plans to distribute Mythos to several dozen additional companies and organizations, citing security concerns," the publication wrote. At the same time, French ministers have been "demanding" access for EU banks and companies, it was also said, and in early May, Eurogroup President Kyriakos Pierrakakis stressed how important Mythos is: "I don't think we have the luxury of not trying to establish channels of communication with the US." Pierrakakis said. "The challenge here is that technologies like AI necessitate international governance frameworks at a moment when multilateralism is challenged." Anthropic's announcement of the Mythos Preview model shook the entire cybersecurity industry. Apparently, the tool can easily surface decades-old vulnerabilities in fully patched systems and programs and use them to create working exploits. The AI was deemed too dangerous to be shared with the public and was instead given to a handful of key organizations (banks, critical infrastructure firms, and similar) so that they may secure their products before bad actors get their hands on the tool. Via Bloomberg Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.
Share
Copy Link
The European Commission is sending officials to San Francisco this week to negotiate access to Anthropic's powerful Mythos AI model. The tool can identify decades-old vulnerabilities and generate exploits at speed, prompting US officials to block wider distribution over security concerns. French ministers have demanded access for EU banks and critical infrastructure firms.
The European Commission is dispatching officials to San Francisco this week to meet with Anthropic representatives and secure access to the Mythos AI model for European companies and organizations
2
. The EU is looking to "intensify" discussions with the U.S. administration on advanced AI models, particularly those with cyber capabilities, according to a Commission official who spoke with CNBC1
. The push comes after Anthropic announced its powerful Mythos model in April, which sent governments and businesses into a frenzy over concerns about AI-powered cyberattacks.
Source: TechRadar
Anthropc initially rolled out the Mythos AI model to a select group of companies and organizations in preview as part of Project Glasswing
1
. However, US officials recently blocked the company's plans to expand access to roughly 70 additional organizations, citing security concerns1
. The AI lab has yet to grant the EU, its AI office, or any government organizations outside of the U.S., aside from the U.K.'s AI Security Institute, preview access to review it. The White House says it's working closely with AI labs to strike a balance between innovation and AI safety, as the U.S. seeks to preserve its lead over China in the global AI race1
.The Mythos model possesses alarming capabilities that distinguish it from other advanced AI models. The tool can surface decades-old vulnerabilities in fully patched systems and programs, then use them to create working exploits
2
. This vulnerability identification and exploit generation capability was deemed too dangerous to be shared with the public. Instead, Anthropic provided access to a handful of key organizations, including banks and critical infrastructure firms, so they could secure their products before bad actors obtain the tool2
.Related Stories
French ministers have been "demanding" access to the Mythos model for EU banks and companies
2
. The European Commission has been pushing for access ever since Anthropic first disclosed Project Glasswing, seeking to test its networks and those of EU banks, critical infrastructure firms, and tech companies2
. In early May, Eurogroup President Kyriakos Pierrakakis emphasized the importance of securing access: "I don't think we have the luxury of not trying to establish channels of communication with the US. The challenge here is that technologies like AI necessitate international governance frameworks at a moment when multilateralism is challenged"2
.Thomas Regnier, Commission spokesperson, told CNBC that "cybersecurity is a shared priority and we have agreed to mutually recognise our respective standards in this area," referring to talks between the European Commission and the U.S. administration
1
. He added that "in parallel we are now expanding technical discussions with Anthropic and other model developers which have notified their latest models to the AI office"1
. Apparently, Anthropic is also eager to expand the number of organizations that are part of the trial phase but is being held back by the US government2
. The situation highlights the tension between advancing cybersecurity defenses through controlled access to Mythos model and preventing potential misuse that could enable sophisticated AI-powered cyberattacks.Summarized by
Navi
23 Apr 2026•Policy and Regulation

01 May 2026•Policy and Regulation

14 Apr 2026•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
