2 Sources
[1]
The Feds and Law Enforcement Are Worried AI Backlash Could Turn Into â€~Anti-Tech Violent Extremism’
The threat of domestic terrorism could give Trump’s AI-friendly administration a convenient reason to keep tabs on anti-AI movements and data center protests. U.S. law enforcement agencies have taken notice of the growing backlash to AI and in response are shifting their sights to what they are calling “anti-technology extremists.â€Â This shift is documented in over 1,000 pages of unpublished reports from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), and fusion centers across the country obtained by Wired. Fusion centers are intelligence-sharing hubs where federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies work together to collect, analyze, and share information. According to a new WIRED report, these agencies have produced a growing number of reports that appear to connect anti-AI sentiment to potential domestic terrorism threats. "The chaotic atmosphere that may result from emergent AI technology in the next five years may fuel large-scale protests that devolve into civil unrest and anti-tech violent extremist activity, especially in large urban areas such as New York City,†reads one report from the New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau. WIRED notes that the term “anti-tech violent extremism†does not appear in any public domestic extremism reports from DHS or the FBI, suggesting that this is a relatively new category. The backdrop to all of this is President Donald Trump’s pro-business, pro-AI agenda colliding with growing public resentment toward the technology. So far, the Trump administration has taken a largely hands-off approach to regulating AI and has often given the industry what it wants. In December, Trump signed an executive order aimed at curbing what his administration described as burdensome state AI regulations in the name of national and economic security. Just this month, he also backed out of signing an executive order that would have created a voluntary framework for AI companies to give the federal government access to frontier AI models up to 90 days before their wider release to “strengthen the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure.â€Â At the same time, his administration has taken a much tougher stance toward some forms of political dissent. Trump’s National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 calls for a national strategy directing the Department of Justice and other federal agencies to investigate and prosecute political violence with a focus on groups tied to views the memo describes as “anti-Americanism†and “anti-capitalism.†Meanwhile, Trump’s counterterrorism adviser Sebastian Gorka released a public counterterrorism strategy this month that groups violent left-wing extremists alongside narcoterrorists, and legacy Islamist terrorists as the top major threats against the U.S. That sets the stage for law enforcement to treat some anti-AI organizing as a potential threat at a time when skepticism of the technology is only growing. Even Pope Leo XIV entered the debate this week with his first encyclical, calling for AI to be “disarmed." A broad range of activity is being grouped together under this emerging anti-tech extremism umbrella, according to WIRED. On one end, the New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau highlighted the arrest and trial of Ziz LaSota, the alleged leader of a group with extreme views about AI that has been linked to multiple murders. On the other end, several fusion centers are keeping tabs on public meetings like town halls and budget committee meetings where residents are showing up to complain about data centers being built in their neighborhoods. "The FBI investigates individuals who commit or intend to commit violence and criminal activity that constitutes a federal crime or poses a threat to national security. We have no additional comment," the Bureau told Gizmodo in an emailed statement. The DHS and New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau did not immediatly respond to requests for comment.
[2]
Anti-AI activism might land you on a law enforcement watchlist
Listed "suspicious activities" related to this new category of extremism include the act of monitoring AI data centers. Law enforcement agencies have started monitoring for what they're calling "anti-tech violent extremism." According to a new report released today, internal memos from the FBI, DHS, and local fusion centers make reference to purported dangers posed by growing opposition to the rapidly expanding AI sector and the data centers that power it, with at least one Regional Intelligence Center identifying activities like photographing a data center as suspicious activity that can identify "adversarial actors."
Share
Copy Link
U.S. law enforcement agencies are tracking opposition to AI under a new category called anti-tech violent extremism. Over 1,000 pages of internal reports from the FBI, DHS, and fusion centers reveal growing surveillance of anti-AI activism, from data center protests to town hall meetings, raising concerns about how political dissent is being monitored under Trump's pro-AI agenda.
U.S. law enforcement agencies have begun monitoring growing AI backlash under a newly emerging classification called anti-tech violent extremism. Over 1,000 pages of unpublished reports from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), and fusion centers across the country reveal this shift in surveillance priorities
1
. Fusion centers, which serve as intelligence-sharing hubs where federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies collaborate to collect and analyze information, have produced a growing number of reports connecting anti-AI sentiment to potential domestic terrorism threats.The scope of activities being tracked under this umbrella is remarkably broad. On one end, the New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau has highlighted the arrest and trial of Ziz LaSota, the alleged leader of a group with extreme views about AI that has been linked to multiple murders
1
. But on the other end, several fusion centers are monitoring public meetings like town halls and budget committee meetings where residents protest data center construction in their neighborhoods. At least one Regional Intelligence Center has identified activities like photographing data centers as suspicious activities that can identify "adversarial actors"2
. This raises questions about whether ordinary citizens engaging in political dissent could find themselves on a law enforcement watchlist simply for opposing the AI sector.Internal reports paint an alarming picture of anticipated civil unrest tied to AI deployment. "The chaotic atmosphere that may result from emergent AI technology in the next five years may fuel large-scale protests that devolve into civil unrest and anti-tech violent extremist activity, especially in large urban areas such as New York City," reads one report from the New York Intelligence and Counterterrorism Bureau
1
. The term "anti-tech violent extremism" does not appear in any public domestic extremism reports from DHS or the FBI, suggesting this represents a relatively new category of surveillance1
.Related Stories

Source: Gizmodo
This surveillance shift occurs as President Donald Trump's pro-business, pro-AI agenda collides with mounting public resentment toward the technology. The Trump administration has taken a largely hands-off approach to regulating AI. In December, Trump signed an executive order aimed at curbing what his administration described as burdensome state AI regulations in the name of national and economic security
1
. Just this month, he backed out of signing an executive order that would have created a voluntary framework for AI companies to give the federal government access to frontier AI models up to 90 days before their wider release.The administration has simultaneously taken a tougher stance toward certain forms of opposition to the AI sector. Trump's National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 calls for a national strategy directing the Department of Justice and other federal agencies to investigate and prosecute political violence with a focus on groups tied to views the memo describes as "anti-Americanism" and "anti-capitalism"
1
. Trump's counterterrorism adviser Sebastian Gorka released a public counterterrorism strategy this month that groups violent left-wing extremists alongside narcoterrorists and legacy Islamist terrorists as top major threats against the U.S. This creates an environment where law enforcement may treat some anti-AI activism as a potential threat at a time when skepticism of the technology continues to grow. When contacted, the FBI told media outlets: "The FBI investigates individuals who commit or intend to commit violence and criminal activity that constitutes a federal crime or poses a threat to national security"1
.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
07 Apr 2026•Entertainment and Society

11 Apr 2026•Business and Economy

22 Apr 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
