14 Sources
[1]
Fintech founder charged with fraud after 'AI' shopping app found to be powered by humans in the Philippines | TechCrunch
Albert Saniger, the founder and former CEO of Nate, an AI shopping app that promised a "universal" checkout experience, was charged with defrauding investors on Wednesday, according to a press release from the U.S. Department of Justice. Founded in 2018, Nate raised over $50 million from investors
[2]
Tech CEO charged for faking AI with human labor.
Albert Sangier's Nate service claimed it enabled customers to "skip the checkout" using artificial intelligence, but reporting by The Information in 2022 revealed that "between 60 percent and 100 percent" of transactions were actually handled manually -- primarily by workers in the Philippines. And
[3]
This Company's 'AI' Was Really Just Remote Human Workers Pushing Buttons
Albert Saniger raised $40 million for Nate, an e-commerce company that supposedly used AI to help people complete online purchases. That AI didn't exist and he's now facing prison time. A tech CEO who claimed to have built a cutting-edge AI for e-commerce was actually having human workers doing
[4]
Tech founder charged with fraud for 'AI' that was secretly overseas contract workers
The US Department of Justice has indicted Albert Sangier for defrauding investors with misleading statements about his Nate financial technology platform. Founded by Sangier in 2018, Nate claimed it could offer shoppers a universal checkout app thanks to artificial intelligence. However, the states
[5]
Founder of Nate app faces fraud charge for using "AI" that was really human call center workers
Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. What just happened? There's plenty of debate about the definition of AI, but one thing it certainly isn't is a group of humans working away in the Philippines and Romania. Albert Saniger, the
[6]
CEO Faces Fraud Charge After AI Shopping App Allegedly Found Using Humans
Nate was an AI shopping app that promised to automate the checkout process. DOJ says workers in the Philippines completed transactions manually. The Department of Justice has charged a founder with defrauding investors after his AI shopping app was allegedly discovered to be nothing more than a
[7]
Tech CEO promised AI but hired workers in the Philippines instead, FBI claims
This time, humans are coming for the AI's jobs. Credit: rob dobi / Getty Images The former CEO of fintech app Nate has been charged with fraud for making misleading claims about the app's artificial intelligence technology -- or lack thereof. In a bizarre twist from the usual AI narrative, the
[8]
'AI-powered' shopping app alleged to have been human-powered
You may have occasionally joked about how companies these days seem to be falling over themselves to launch something, anything, that has AI, even just a little bit, somewhere under the hood. That way they can run dazzling ad campaigns that make the product sound like it's at the cutting-edge,
[9]
Startup CEO Charged After "AI" Turns Out to Be Humans in the Philippines - Decrypt
A tech founder who raised over $40 million pitching a cutting-edge AI shopping app has been charged in the U.S. with fraud after it was revealed the AI powering the app was a call center full of human workers in the Philippines. Albert Saniger, 35, founder and former CEO of "nate," allegedly
[10]
Former Nate CEO who used human workers instead of AI allegedly defrauded investors lured by new tech of millions
A fintech startup that raised $40 million based on the premise of its artificial intelligence capabilities was fueled by human labor, allegedly defrauding investors lured by the new technology of millions, federal prosecutors said this week in a statement. Albert Saniger, 35, the former CEO and
[11]
App promising a universal shopping experience automated with AI actually used a small army of human workers in the Philippines and Romania instead
The power of a button or in this instance, several hundred people pressing other buttons. In the world of technology, exaggerating the capabilities of a product is pretty much the norm. But when one app company managed to raise millions of dollars in investments on the promise that it would be
[12]
Feds, SEC charge app maker with fraud, saying 'AI' service was Philippine workers
US authorities allege the Nate app was not powered by artificial intelligence but actually overseas human workers who manually processed transactions. US authorities have charged a tech app founder with fraud, alleging that his advertised artificial intelligence-powered e-commerce app actually
[13]
Nate's 'AI' was just people in a room: Startup founder charged with faking AI, raising $50 million on false claims
Albert Saniger, founder of the so-called AI-driven shopping app Nate, has been charged with defrauding investors by masking a human-powered operation as artificial intelligence. The US Department of Justice alleges Saniger raised over $50 million by claiming his app used proprietary AI to automate
[14]
Nate founder charged with fraud over 'AI' shopping app secretly powered by humans
This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. Founded in 2018, the nate app boasted that AI enabled it to help users buy a product from any e-commerce site with the click of a button, acting as a universal
Share
Copy Link
Albert Saniger, founder of Nate, faces fraud charges for claiming AI-powered shopping when human workers were actually processing transactions.

Albert Saniger, the 35-year-old founder and former CEO of Nate, an e-commerce app that promised a "universal" checkout experience powered by artificial intelligence, has been charged with defrauding investors by the U.S. Department of Justice
1
2
. The charges stem from allegations that Nate's touted AI technology was, in reality, a facade concealing a workforce of human contractors.Founded in 2018, Nate raised over $50 million from prominent investors, including a $38 million Series A round in 2021
1
. The app claimed to offer users the ability to purchase from any e-commerce site with a single click, thanks to its proprietary AI technology3
. Saniger repeatedly assured investors and the public that Nate's app could complete online purchases autonomously, boasting a 93% to 97% completion rate without human intervention3
.Contrary to Nate's claims, the DOJ's Southern District of New York alleges that the app relied heavily on hundreds of human contractors in call centers, primarily located in the Philippines and Romania
1
4
. These workers manually completed the purchases that were supposed to be handled by AI2
. The indictment states that Nate's actual automation rate was effectively 0 percent, despite the company's acquisition of some AI technology and the hiring of data scientists1
.Saniger's alleged fraud extended beyond misrepresenting the app's capabilities. He distinguished Nate's technology from automated bots, claiming it used neural networks to complete actions like a human would
3
. This deception, along with instructions to employees to keep the true automation rate secret, allowed Saniger to raise over $40 million from investors3
.The scheme began to unravel following an investigation by The Information in 2022, which revealed that between 60% and 100% of Nate's transactions were handled manually
2
5
. By January 2023, Nate had run out of money and was forced to sell its assets, leaving investors with near-total losses3
5
.Related Stories
Saniger now faces charges of securities fraud and wire fraud, each carrying a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison
5
. The case highlights a growing concern in the tech industry about the misrepresentation of AI capabilities4
. Similar incidents have been reported in other sectors, including drive-through software and legal tech, where human labor was disguised as AI-driven solutions1
5
.This case is not isolated, as other companies have faced scrutiny for exaggerating their AI capabilities. For instance, Presto Automation, a labor automation technology provider, recently disclosed that human agents assisted in processing nearly three-quarters of orders in its fast-food voice-ordering products, contradicting earlier claims of minimal human intervention
5
.The Nate scandal serves as a cautionary tale for investors and consumers alike, emphasizing the need for greater transparency and verification of AI claims in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
26 Sept 2024

18 Apr 2026•Policy and Regulation

25 Jan 2025•Business and Economy

1
Science and Research

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
