22 Sources
[1]
Elsevier vs. Meta: first science publisher sues over scraped research papers
A scientific publisher has joined the dozens of firms and individuals suing artificial intelligence companies over their alleged use of copyrighted works in training AI models. Elsevier - which publishes thousands of journals, including Cell and The Lancet - was part of a class-action lawsuit
[2]
Even More Authors, Publishers Sue Meta Over Copyright in AI Training: What's Different Now
Academic and entertainment publishers say Meta "engaged in one of the most massive infringements of copyrighted materials in history" in a new lawsuit filed on Tuesday in a US District Court in New York. The claims are familiar: Publishers, including McGraw-Hill, Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette and
[3]
Major publishers sue Meta for copyright infringement over AI training
May 5 (Reuters) - Publishers Elsevier, Cengage [RIC:RIC:TLACQ.UL], Hachette (ALHG.PA), opens new tab, Macmillan and McGraw Hill (MH.N), opens new tab sued Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday, alleging that the tech giant misused their books and journal
[4]
Meta and Zuckerberg sued by publishers over 'massive' copyright infringement
Meta and its chief executive Mark Zuckerberg face a lawsuit from a coalition of major publishers, alleging the social media platform illegally used copyrighted works to train its Llama AI models. Five publishers -- Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, Elsevier and Cengage -- along with bestselling
[5]
Book publishers accuse Meta and Mark Zuckerberg of copyright infringement - Engadget
Meta's AI endeavors have drawn another legal challenge. The social media company and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg are facing a class action lawsuit from five book publishers and one author on claims that it illegally used copyrighted works to train its Llama generative AI platform. The plaintiffs in the
[6]
Mark Zuckerberg 'personally authorized' Meta's copyright infringement, publishers allege
NEW YORK (AP) -- Five publishing houses and author Scott Turow sued Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday, alleging the company illegally used millions of copyrighted works to train its AI language system Llama. The class action lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, accuses the tech
[7]
Five Publishers and Scott Turow Sue Meta and Mark Zuckerberg
The class-action lawsuit accuses the tech giant and its founder and chief executive of infringing on authors' copyrights. Five major publishers -- Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, Elsevier and Cengage -- and the best-selling novelist Scott Turow have filed a class-action copyright infringement
[8]
Five major publishers are suing Meta over Llama
Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette, Macmillan, and McGraw Hill, joined by author Scott Turow, filed a proposed class action in Manhattan on Tuesday alleging Meta pirated millions of their works to train Llama. After Judge Chhabria's June 2025 ruling, plaintiffs with stronger market-harm evidence have been
[9]
Scott Turow's latest real-life legal thriller: Suing Meta for copyright infringement
Publishing houses Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, Elsevier and Cengage joined forces with bestselling author Scott Turow (and his own company S.C.R.I.B.E) to file a class-action lawsuit on Tuesday against Meta and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. The plaintiffs accuse the tech company of building
[10]
Major Lawsuit Claims Mark Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized' Use of Copyrighted Works for AI
Five publishing houses and a best-selling novelist have filed a lawsuit alleging that Meta illegally used millions of copyrighted works to train its AI language system Llama, and Mark Zuckerberg "personally authorized" the company's copyright infringement. Five major publishers -- Hachette,
[11]
Major publishers sue Meta for copyright infringement over AI training
Hachette, Macmillan and others allege that Meta pirated millions of works from textbooks to novels for Llama model Five major publishers sued Meta Platforms in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday, alleging that the tech giant misused their books and journal articles to train its artificial
[12]
James Patterson, Biden publishers say Mark Zuckerberg 'personally authorized' copyright infringement in new lawsuit against Meta | Fortune
Five publishing houses and author Scott Turow sued Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday, alleging the company illegally used millions of copyrighted works to train its AI language system Llama. The class action lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, accuses the tech giant of copyright
[13]
Publishers, author Scott Turow accuse Meta and Mark Zuckerberg of training AI on copyrighted works
Mary Cunningham is a reporter for CBS MoneyWatch. She previously worked at "60 Minutes," CBSNews.com and CBS News 24/7 as part of the CBS News Associate Program. A group of publishers and bestselling novelist Scott Turow are suing Meta and its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, alleging that the tech giant
[14]
Publishers accuse Meta of massive copyright infringement
Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg are facing a class action lawsuit filed by five book publishers and best-selling author Scott Turow, alleging copyright infringement in the training of its Llama generative AI platform. The plaintiffs include Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, Elsevier, and Cengage. The
[15]
Mark Zuckerberg 'personally authorized' Meta's copyright infringement, publishers allege
NEW YORK (AP) -- Five publishing houses and author Scott Turow sued Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday, alleging the company illegally used millions of copyrighted works to train its AI language system Llama. The class action lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, accuses the tech
[16]
Meta sued for allegedly using copyrighted work to train AI
Yesterday, a major legal battle put AI right in the center of a debate that goes far beyond technology -- it really goes to the heart of creativity, ownership, and what it means to be an author in 2026. Five major publishers, along with bestselling novelist Scott Turow, have filed a class-action
[17]
Mark Zuckerberg 'Personally Authorized' Meta's Copyright Infringement, Publishers Allege
NEW YORK (AP) -- Five publishing houses and author Scott Turow sued Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Tuesday, alleging the company illegally used millions of copyrighted works to train its AI language system Llama. The class action lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, accuses the tech
[18]
Major publishers sue Meta for copyright infringement over AI training
Major publishers have filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms in Manhattan federal court. They accuse the tech giant of using millions of their books and journal articles without permission to train its artificial intelligence model, Llama. This legal action marks a new development in copyright
[19]
Publishers Accuse Meta of Misusing Their Works in AI Training | PYMNTS.com
In a federal class action lawsuit filed Tuesday (May 5), publishing houses Elsevier, Cengage Learning, Hachette, Macmillan, and McGraw Hill accused Meta and founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg of violating copyright laws through "willful infringement" of millions of books and journal articles. "Meta
[20]
Macmillan & others allege Meta used pirated books to train Llama
A coalition of major publishers -- Elsevier, Cengage, Hachette, Macmillan, and McGraw-Hill -- along with bestselling author Scott Turow and his company S.C.R.I.B.E., Inc., filed a class action complaint against Meta Platforms, Inc. and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, in the U.S. District Court for the
[21]
AI Copyright Dispute Puts Meta & Juckerberg in Legal Spotlight Again
Meta and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg are facing a fresh lawsuit alleging the use of pirated books to train AI models. The latest legal battle sparks renewed debate over copyright laws, data ethics, and the future of AI regulation. The lawsuit opens a new front in the ongoing copyright battle between
[22]
Meta, Mark Zuckerberg sued for allegedly using pirated books to train AI
The case adds to ongoing legal battles involving AI firms like Anthropic and OpenAI over fair use and copyright. Meta and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg are now under fire again after publishers filed a fresh legal challenge in the US. As per the reports, major publishers and an author have filed a
Share
Copy Link
Five major publishers including Elsevier, Hachette, and Macmillan have filed a class-action lawsuit against Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, alleging the company illegally used millions of copyrighted books and research papers to train its Llama AI models. The case marks the first AI copyright lawsuit brought by major scientific publishers and could reshape the legal landscape of AI development.
Meta and CEO Mark Zuckerberg face a class-action lawsuit against Meta filed on May 5 in the Southern District of New York by five major publishers and bestselling author Scott Turow
1
. The plaintiffs—Elsevier, Hachette, Macmillan, McGraw Hill, and Cengage—allege that Meta engaged in "one of the most massive infringements of copyrighted materials in history" by using their works without permission to train Llama AI models2
. This marks the first time major scientific publishers have taken legal action against an AI company over copyright infringement, according to the Association of American Publishers1
.
Source: Nature
The lawsuit alleges Meta pirated millions of copyrighted works ranging from scientific journal articles published in Cell and The Lancet to textbooks and novels including "The Fifth Season" by N.K. Jemisin
3
. According to the complaint, Meta accessed scraped research papers and other copyrighted material for AI training through multiple sources, including the Common Crawl data set and file-sharing sites like LibGen and Sci-Hub1
. Evidence presented includes internal emails between Meta employees revealed during a previous case, Kadrey v. Meta1
.Source: The Hill
The lawsuit specifically names Mark Zuckerberg as a defendant, claiming he "personally authorized and actively encouraged" the alleged copyright infringement
2
. The filing alleges that Zuckerberg instructed the company to abandon licensing negotiations with publishers and deliberately stripped works of attribution data to conceal training sources4
. The publishers argue that Meta's generative AI platform functions as "an infinite substitution machine," producing imitation versions of original works that displace human-authored content in the marketplace4
.Scott Turow, former Authors Guild President and plaintiff in the case, expressed his frustration: "I find it distressing and infuriating that one of the top-10 richest corporations in the world knowingly used pirated sources of my books, and thousands of other authors, to train Llama"
2
. The plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages and aim to represent a broader class of copyright owners3
.Meta has vowed to "fight this lawsuit aggressively," arguing that training AI on copyrighted material qualifies as fair use under US copyright law
1
. The company maintains that "AI is powering transformative innovations, productivity and creativity for individuals and companies, and courts have rightly found that training AI on copyrighted material can qualify as fair use"5
. This defense mirrors Meta's successful 2025 ruling where a judge found insufficient evidence that Llama AI models would harm the market for human-created content4
.
Source: FT
However, the legal landscape of AI remains unsettled. While US courts have generally backed claims that large language model use of copyrighted material is "transformative," two landmark 2025 rulings warned that acquiring and storing pirated content can constitute infringement, particularly if copyright holders demonstrate substantial market harm
1
. US District Court Judge Vince Chhabria noted in a previous Meta ruling that "the market for the typical human-created romance or spy novel could be diminished substantially by the proliferation of similar AI-created works"2
.Related Stories
Academic texts represent valuable training resources for Llama AI models because they contain high-quality, human-written information that can boost accuracy on scientific topics
1
. Repositories like PubMed are commonly used to build specialized training data sets for scientific domains1
. Yet the proliferation of licensing deals between publishers and tech companies raises concerns about access for researchers building open-source models, potentially strengthening big AI firms while limiting broader innovation1
.The case joins dozens of similar lawsuits against AI companies, with Anthropic recently settling author claims for $1.5 billion, or approximately $3,000 per pirated work
2
. The plaintiffs point to AI-generated books already flooding Amazon's marketplace as evidence of market displacement4
. As this case unfolds, it will test whether courts continue to favor tech companies' fair use arguments or shift toward protecting creators' economic interests in the rapidly evolving AI ecosystem.Summarized by
Navi
08 Feb 2025•Technology
11 Mar 2025•Policy and Regulation

02 Apr 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Technology
