2 Sources
[1]
IMF, OECD warn AI could widen rich-poor country divide
Oct 22 (Reuters) - Artificial intelligence could boost global growth, but poorer countries, smaller companies and younger workers risk missing out unless access to power, digital infrastructure and skills improves, according to officials from the IMF and OECD. The warning comes as massive
[2]
IMF, OECD warn AI could widen rich-poor country divide
Artificial intelligence holds the potential to significantly enhance global economic growth and productivity rates. However, poorer countries and smaller businesses face severe challenges in adopting this technology due to inadequate resources. Young and entry-level workers are particularly at risk
Share
Copy Link
The IMF and OECD caution that while AI could add 0.5% to annual global growth, poorer countries and younger workers face significant barriers to adoption. Major companies like Barclays, eBay, and Qualcomm are cutting thousands of jobs as AI-driven cost-cutting accelerates.
AI holds significant potential to boost global economic output, yet the IMF and OECD warn that this technology could widen the rich-poor country divide unless critical barriers are addressed
1
. Era Dabla-Norris, deputy director of the International Monetary Fund's Fiscal Affairs Department, emphasized that for developing economies, the critical question centers on whether they can adopt and diffuse AI effectively2
. Access to reliable power, robust digital infrastructure, and skilled workers remains inadequate in poorer nations, creating significant obstacles to AI adoption that could leave these countries further behind.The IMF estimates that effective AI adoption could add up to 0.5% to annual global growth over the medium term
1
. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development projects even broader productivity gains, estimating AI could contribute 0.4% to 1.2% to annual productivity growth across member countries2
. However, Dabla-Norris noted that aggregate productivity evidence so far shows much less impact than projected. OECD chief economist Stefano Scarpetta highlighted a troubling gap between potential and reality, observing that workplace adoption significantly trails consumer use, with only limited integration in core business functions1
.The economic and labor market implications of AI are already materializing through mass layoffs across major corporations. The IMF estimates that approximately 40% of jobs worldwide could be exposed to AI
2
. Barclays announced it was cutting around 5,000 jobs this year as it deploys AI-driven cost-cutting measures to reduce expenses and improve returns1
. eBay is reportedly laying off 9% of its workforce, while Qualcomm is implementing a "performance-focused reduction" that will eliminate jobs globally2
. These developments underscore how AI adoption is reshaping employment landscapes, particularly in developed economies where companies possess the resources to implement these technologies.Related Stories
Dabla-Norris raised particular concerns about younger workers vulnerable to AI's displacement of entry-level tasks that traditionally serve as pathways for skill development and career advancement
1
. As AI increasingly automates routine functions through which employees gain experience, entry-level workers face diminished opportunities to build foundational skills. This trend threatens to create a generation of workers who lack the practical experience needed to advance in their careers. Smaller companies, which often provide these entry-level opportunities, face their own challenges in adopting AI due to limited resources and technical expertise, potentially exacerbating the inequality between large and small businesses2
. The warnings come amid massive investment in chips and AI infrastructure that has supported global growth and driven stock markets to record highs, even as questions emerge about whether companies can generate sufficient returns on these commitments as borrowing costs rise1
.Summarized by
Navi
07 Oct 2026•Policy and Regulation

23 Jan 2026•Business and Economy

02 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Technology
