LinkedIn Introduces 'AI Slop' Button as Platform Battles Low-Quality AI-Generated Posts

LinkedIn adds a button to report AI-generated 'slop'

LinkedIn is taking aim at the "AI slop" -- low-quality, artificially generated content -- filling its feed. On Thursday, the company announced that it's adding a new feature to let users click a "seems like AI slop" button when someone's post appears to have been written with AI. The move reflects a broader shift across online publishing platforms to cut back on AI content, as people have grown frustrated with the computer-written, inauthentic posts filling the web. Last week, for instance, newsletter platform Substack added a tool to help users identify when the content they're reading on its site was written by AI, through a partnership with Pangram. Meanwhile, Pangram this week announced $9 million in new funding to tackle the problems of AI content flooding the internet. The problem is also impacting new startups, as Digg had to shut down its Reddit competitor in March, saying it couldn't get a handle on the number of bots flooding its site. Internet infrastructure firm Cloudflare says the problem is just getting worse, as there is now more bot traffic on the web than human-generated requests -- a milestone that was reached faster than it had previously predicted. In a post on LinkedIn, the company's Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan admitted the Microsoft-owned social network is facing similar problems. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas, and expertise," he said. The exec explained that the new "Seems like AI slop" button is now one of several measures LinkedIn is using to reduce the amount of low-quality, AI-generated content on its platform. The company is also investing in automation defenses, where it now blocks "hundreds of thousands" of automated comment attempts daily, and millions of other automation attempts in just the past couple of months. Srinivasan said LinkedIn is also introducing new classifiers to identify if a post is AI slop or other low-quality content, which would reduce the amount of slop you'd see in suggested content recommendations from outside your network. (The button ties into this measure as it will provide a source of signal that will allow LinkedIn to tune its AI models to better identify slop.) Plus, LinkedIn will begin privately flagging in users' dashboards when people believe their content is coming off as inauthentic due to heavy use of AI. The company believes that this will help posters improve their writing, in the case that they're simply using AI technology to refine their own work, rather than when they're posting what's considered full-on "slop" content. Notably, the company is pulling its own "enhance your post" feature that had used AI to help you write. It's replacing it with a feature that proofreads your words, instead of changing your voice. Other improvements include expanding access to profile and page verification tools, and adding an option to block comments from company pages you no longer want to see, Srinivasan said.

LinkedIn Added a New Way to Report AI Slop - CNET

Katelyn is a reporter with CNET covering artificial intelligence, including chatbots, image and video generators.... Read full bio If you're tired of reading obviously AI-generated LinkedIn posts about the magic of B2B sales, there's hope: LinkedIn on Thursday released a new tool that allows you to report posts as "Seems like AI slop." AI slop is the term given to the deluge of posts, images and videos created with generative AI flooding social media like an oil spill. These posts tend to offer little value and clog up feeds. Every social media platform is struggling to hold back the tide of AI slop, and LinkedIn is certainly no exception. A recent report from research firm Pangram found that one in four long-form social media posts was AI-generated. Of those AI posts, nearly two-thirds (62%) appeared on LinkedIn. On X (formerly Twitter), nearly half of all articles contained AI writing. Now, you can report posts you're suspicious of by tapping the three dots next to a post and selecting "Seems like AI slop." 404 Media first spotted the feature. Hari Srinivasan, LinkedIn's chief product officer, shared on Thursday that the company is ramping up efforts to identify AI slop. Allowing people to report posts that seem like AI slop will help LinkedIn get better at spotting the AI-created, low-quality content. "Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds," Srinivasan said. It has also removed the "enhance with AI" option that appears when you are drafting a post, and will be replacing it with an option that proofreads your words without substantially rewriting them with AI. Srinivasan said LinkedIn is flagging "hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts" and has blocked billions more attempts to use automated postings (usually with the aid of AI) across the platform.

LinkedIn's new 'Seems like AI slop' button lets you report all those cringey posts

LinkedIn's 'Seems like AI slop' button is coming to users, and its existence signals a changing perspective on AI infiltrating digital communities. Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google. ZDNET's key takeaways * LinkedIn announced a "Seems like AI slop" button. * Users can report low-quality AI-written posts. * AI slop posts are ubiquitous on the internet. As LinkedIn has solidified itself as a corporate influencer site-slash-job-hunting search engine, there's something that irritates users more than the cog-in-the-corporate-machine posters themselves: AI slop. Someone mentioning that the most important executive-level lessons aren't discovered in a boardroom -- but in some other innocuous and unrelated setting. A callout to today's "fast-paced world." Several short, jab-like sentences. Dramatic line breaks. Wrapping up the post by encouraging the reader to "let that sink in." And honestly? The entire post ends up being a big, fat nothingburger. Also: OpenAI's rogue agent didn't stop at Hugging Face - here's what we know Do you recognize this prose? AI-written text posts are all over the internet, and LinkedIn is a breeding ground for them. An Originality.ai study found that 81% of long-form posts on LinkedIn are likely AI-generated. Users are growing frustrated, and LinkedIn is vowing to do something about it. What is AI slop? According to Merriam-Webster, AI slop (noun) is "digital content of low quality that is produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence." The term has become so popular that this definition is the first in the updated dictionary under "slop," and the Associated Press created an entry for it in the latest edition of its writing and editing guide for journalists. Also: What the FCC ban on foreign-made robot vacuums means for your Roomba AI slop can refer to thoughtless, mass-produced AI-generated images, music, videos, and text posts whose creators hope to game an algorithm, generate views and clicks, and make money. Are you familiar with "Fruit Love Island"? How LinkedIn is fighting AI slop Hari Srinivasan, chief product officer at LinkedIn, posted on the site detailing how the company is combating swaths of AI-generated content. In his post, Srinivasan said the platform has invested in its automated defenses, especially in the comments section. Srinivasan's post also said that the platform is introducing new classifiers to identify low-quality content. However, Srinivasan acknowledged that not all AI-generated content is slop, as some people use AI to refine their raw thoughts, and more users can recognize when AI-generated posts are made in good faith or are mindless and disingenuous. Also: 74% of workers ask AI questions instead of colleagues - with potentially serious consequences Though LinkedIn is deploying automated models to recognize slop posts, Srinivasan said real user feedback is more valuable, and encouraged users to use the new "Seems like AI slop" button to report suspected posts. People who create posts will be able to privately see in their dashboards when their audience members feel their posts are inauthentic and slop-adjacent. As a result, users should see fewer slop-like posts in their suggested content feed from users outside of their networks, and posts suspected of being slop will have a smaller reach. Why does LinkedIn attract so much AI slop? LinkedIn's posting culture can sometimes reward performative "hustle culture" and constant "C-suite level thought leadership" posts, which creates a byproduct of some people posting hollow, low-effort content on these topics to stay relevant and visible. Also: AI agents are your new colleagues - how to get the best results According to Hootsuite, LinkedIn's algorithm rewards topic relevance, post engagement, and topic consistency. So, someone who makes two to three AI-generated posts a day about "C-suite level thought leadership" with hundreds of AI-generated comments underneath it will experience wider reach and increased engagement than someone who has real thoughts to share on the same topic two to three times a month. LinkedIn isn't the only online platform looking to decrease the amount of AI slop users encounter. Substack, a digital writing and newsletter tool, announced a partnership with Panagram, an AI detection company, to show readers how much of a Substack post may be AI-generated. Also: I gave Perplexity's agentic AI 5 complex tasks to run on my Mac - and I'll do it again Several threads in Reddit communities parrot a growing annoyance with AI-sloppy text posts online. These posts are everywhere, from book communities to a women's golf subreddit. Perhaps no one predicted that ChatGPT would be used to engagement farm all over the internet at its inception in 2023. Yet, chatbot "speech" patterns are all over the internet now. AI slop posts may not be going anywhere anytime soon, but digital platforms are taking steps to curb their reach and popularity.

LinkedIn actually adds a 'seems like AI slop' button

A lot of content on LinkedIn might seem like AI slop, and now, you'll be able to report those posts. As part of a series of updates to reduce the volume of AI slop on the platform, LinkedIn is introducing an actual button that lets you flag a post as something that "Seems like AI slop." The new feature is part of a broader push to reduce the volume of apparent AI slop on the platform. AI detector Pangram recently found that 41 percent of longform LinkedIn posts were flagged as being completely generated by AI, as reported by 404Media. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us," chief product officer Hari Srinivasan says in a post. "We really care about this." In addition to the button to report a post as seemingly being AI-generated, LinkedIn is also ramping up new classifiers to identify "if a post is AI-slop or generally low-quality content," which will "reduce the amount of AI slop you might see in suggested content and content from outside your network." I'm currently seeing the new report button in the three-dots menu on posts. When I click it, LinkedIn hides the post and shows a message thanking me for my feedback. The new button will help LinkedIn "tune our models and make better feeds," Srinivasan says. The company is also testing a way to show people that other users feel their posts come across as inauthentic or that they include heavy use of AI. In addition, LinkedIn is removing a feature that used AI to "enhance" a post and will replace it with a "feature that proofreads your words, but does not change your voice," according to Srinivasan.

LinkedIn Feed Full of AI Posts? Now You Can Report That It 'Seems Like AI Slop'

In its latest effort to make an entirely corporate-themed social media platform seem cool, LinkedIn has added a feature where you can flag posts that seem "like AI slop" -- its words, not ours. On the surface, it's a bold move from the Microsoft-owned platform, considering Microsoft has invested billions of dollars into AI and doesn't seem to be slowing down anytime soon. However, LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer, Hari Srinivasan, claims, "AI slop is a top priority for all of us." "We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas, and expertise," he wrote in a post on the platform. Flagging a post as AI slop doesn't actually mean it gets taken down, though; it just suppresses it and similar posts from your feed. It also "lets us tune our models and make better feeds," Srinivasan says. It's AI all the way down. LinkedIn is also working on a private flagging system so creators can see when users label their posts as AI slop. It will be visible from the creator's analytics dashboard. "We are ramping [up] the ability for members to tell us if they believe a post or comment seems like AI slop. Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds," says Srinivasan. He also distinguishes between AI and slop as separate, claiming that many people "refine thoughts" with AI and would like to know when they sound inauthentic (which apparently makes it not slop). According to our testing, the AI slop button does not extend to comments at the time of writing. In addition to the new button, LinkedIn is also removing its "enhance your post" feature -- which lets users generate text with AI -- and replacing it with a feature that "proofreads your words, but does not change your voice." The exact distinction between the two features remains unclear.

LinkedIn realizes its users have been bathing in AI slop, offers a shower

LinkedIn has been drenching its users in AI-powered slop posts, going so far as to encourage writers to trade their own voices for a bot's by hitting the "enhance your post" button when they want to share thoughts. Enough is enough. On Thursday, the site's Chief Product Officer has announced several changes designed to rehab the platform's reputation. CPO Hari Srinivasan took to the Microsoft-owned social network following reports Thursday that LinkedIn had introduced a button for users to flag posts as AI slop. He confirmed not only that the reports are real, but that LinkedIn had additional plans as well. The "Seems like AI slop" button is being added to the ellipsis menu on LinkedIn posts now, a spokesperson told us, and will be available on all posts and comments. Srinivasan said this button will not only allow users to report posts with sentences written like this - it will also help LinkedIn refine its AI-spotting AI models to help improve user feeds. In addition, the "enhance your post" button, which used AI to tweak your wording, is being replaced by an option to have AI proofread your work while leaving your voice intact, instead of stealing it like the sea witch Ursula. There's been no shortage of scorn from The Register and elsewhere about LinkedIn's rapid decline into a slop tank filled with faux thought leadership posts and generative drivel. As far back as 2024, reports were coming out that more than half of long-form LinkedIn posts longer than 100 words were believed to be AI generated. That hasn't changed in the past two years. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this," Srinivasan wrote. "People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives," he said, adding that LinkedIn wants to keep it that way - or, more realistically, nudge the platform back toward its former state. Coincidentally or not, Originality.ai, the same AI detection site behind the 2024 report, released an updated scan of LinkedIn posts longer than 100 words on Thursday. According to this new report, a full 81 percent of the 5,000 posts it looked at this month were classified as likely being AI-generated. Srinivasan said it's not just users employing AI to generate slop - it's AI automating garbage posts and comments at scale, throughout the site. "Everyday we are now catching hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts, and have blocked billions of other automation attempts (posting at scale, slop) in the last couple months alone," the LinkedIn CPO said. To that end, the professional social network is also "ramping up a series of new and improved classifiers that identify if a post is AI-slop or generally low-quality content," Srinivasan said. User analytics dashboards will also be getting a new feature that will tell posters when members flag their posts as potentially being AI, as Srinivasan said LinkedIn wants users "to get feedback from real humans on what sounds authentic - not just have an AI detector review it and get it wrong." "AI and slop are not the same thing," Srinivasan added. "Many people refine thoughts with AI, and we believe they want to know when they sound inauthentic." ®

LinkedIn is testing a 'seems like AI slop' reporting tool - Engadget

The company is also removing some of its own AI-writing features. LinkedIn is once again trying to get a handle on the vast amounts of AI slop on the platform. To do that, the company is testing a new reporting tool that let users flag potential slop and removing the "rewrite with AI" button it once promoted on every post. With the new reporting tool, users will have the ability to flag posts as "seems like AI slop." Doing so will "privately flag" via the site's analytics dashboard that others "feel your post may have come off as inauthentic or heavy use of AI," LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan wrote in an update. The move follows an earlier update that aimed to reduce the reach of AI-generated posts on the platform. The company has since done further work to improve its detection systems, Srinivasan said, which should lead to people seeing fewer AI-generated posts recommended in their feeds. Posts that are flagged with the new reporting tool will also see reduced algorithmic reach similar to users' flagging them as "not interested," according to a LinkedIn spokesperson. The company is also recognizing its own role in perpetuating AI slop on the platform. It's removing the built-in AI writing tools that allowed users to "enhance" their posts and messages with the help of LLMs. LinkedIn is instead adding a more toned down version of the feature that "proofreads your words, but does not change your voice,' according to Srinivasan. LinkedIn's crackdown comes as the professional platform has become known as ground zero for AI slop. A recent study from AI detection company Pangram found that LinkedIn "was the most AI-saturated" social media platform with more than 40 percent of longform posts "flagged as fully AI-generated." Given the sheer amount of AI-generated material on the platform, it's unclear if these updates will be enough to change any of those trends. In addition to users who post their own AI slop, the company has seen a massive influx of automated posting thanks to AI bots. Srinivasan said LinkedIn has caught "hundreds of thousands" of automated comments and blocked billions of other attempts at automated posting within the last few months alone.

LinkedIn adds a 'Seems like AI slop' button

LinkedIn has quietly added a "Seems like AI slop" button to its post menu, letting users flag machine-written content that its own systems then learn from. It follows the platform's May crackdown on generic AI posts, and lands as one detection service estimates 41 per cent of long-form LinkedIn posts are likely AI-generated. LinkedIn has a name for the vaguely inspirational, AI-written posts clogging its feed, and now it has a button for them. The professional network has quietly added a "Seems like AI slop" option to its post menu, letting users flag content they think a machine wrote, 404 Media reported. The button sits under the three-dot menu at the top of any post. Click it, and LinkedIn responds: "Thanks for letting us know. Your feedback helps improve the feed." It then hides the post. 404 Media said it took about six seconds of scrolling to find a candidate, flagged by the spacing, emoji, bullet-point takeaways and "X is not Y" phrasing. The wording is what stands out. The button does not say "this looks AI-generated." It says "slop," a blunt piece of internet slang for low-effort machine output, now baked into the interface of a Microsoft-owned platform. Why LinkedIn is doing this The move follows the platform's May crackdown on generic AI posts, which suppressed slop from recommendations rather than removing it. The new button turns detection into a crowd-sourced signal. Every flag helps train LinkedIn's own models to spot the stuff. Hari Srinivasan, LinkedIn's chief product officer, confirmed as much in a post after the report. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us," he wrote. The company is "ramping up a series of new and improved classifiers" to identify slop, and letting members flag posts to help "tune our models and make better feeds." He added a telling caveat. "AI and slop are not the same thing," Srinivasan wrote. Many people refine their thoughts with AI, so LinkedIn will test a private nudge in a poster's analytics when their writing "may have come off as inauthentic." It is also replacing its "enhance your post" feature with a proofreader that does not change a user's voice. The scale of the problem The numbers explain the urgency. Earlier this month, 404 Media reported that the detection service Pangram estimated 41 per cent of long-form LinkedIn posts, and 30 per cent of short ones, are likely AI-generated. Search "LinkedIn AI" and you find countless guides, some hosted on LinkedIn itself, teaching people to automate their posts. The irony is doing a lot of work here. LinkedIn offers its own AI writing assistant that drafts profiles and posts for Premium subscribers. Its parent, Microsoft, is one of OpenAI's biggest backers. The company is, in effect, selling the hose and the mop at once. A wider fight against slop LinkedIn is not alone. The preprint server arXiv now bans researchers who submit AI-riddled papers, and platforms have tightened rules on mass-produced AI channels. The pressure reflects a web where bots now outnumber humans in traffic terms. Whether a report button moves the needle is another matter. Slop is, as Srinivasan admitted, hard to define, and the definition keeps shifting. But asking users to name it, out loud, is a small admission that the feed has a problem. It also shows that proving something is human is becoming its own kind of work.

LinkedIn Adds New 'Seems Like AI Slop' Button to Report All the AI Slop

If you think that most of the posts you encounter on LinkedIn sound like the same corporate drone-generated slop, it's because they are actually AI-generated. To combat that, LinkedIn users are getting a dedicated slop button so they can help mop up the mess being spewed across the internet. "We are ramping the ability for members to tell us if they believe a post or comment seems like AI slop," LinkedIn's chief product officer Hari Srinivasan said in a post on the platform. "Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds." The new feature will allow users to click the three-dot menu in the upper-right corner of each post to select a button labeled "Seems like AI slop." If a post is flagged as AI slop, the sharer will also be privately notified in their analytics dashboard. The new feature comes as slop takes over not just LinkedIn but pretty much the entire social media ecosystem. Srinivasan said that the LinkedIn team has already blocked billions of AI-generated posts and comments in just the last couple of months alone. Substack is also apparently having a big enough problem that CEO Chris Best announced earlier this month that it was integrating AI detection tool Pangram into its platform, in a post that fired open shots at LinkedIn and its subpar reputation. "We built the ability to do a Pangram scan into the Substack app, because we're sick of slop and we don't want substack to turn into LinkedIn," Best said in a chain of posts on X. "Platforms that reward fakeness will drive a race to the bottom. Pangram's data shows that as much 40% of long-form text on LinkedIn is generated." According to Pangram's data, which Best references, LinkedIn has the most long-form AI content out of all popular social media platforms that host long-form content. "LinkedIn posts made up a third of scanned items, yet it accounted for nearly two-thirds (62%) of all AI content we flagged," Pangram said in a blog post from earlier this month. Srinivasan's announcement on LinkedIn didn't attack Substack openly the way Best's did, but it did contain what appears to be a slight jab. "We want members to get feedback from real humans on what sounds authentic - not just have an AI detector review it and get it wrong," Srinivasan wrote. People are increasingly relying on commercial AI detection tools to catch automation attempts, but these tools are not foolproof. They can produce false positives, and considering that many of these AI detection tools themselves are also run by AI, the reasoning that got the tool to its conclusion is obscured from the user, making it harder to decide when to trust the verdict. But humans are also lackluster at discerning AI slop. A lot of the so-called telltale signs of AI-generated writing are just proper language rules (god forbid a writer likes using em dashes or colons!), and these detection tips and tools also often discriminate against non-native English speakers. Previous studies have characterized humans' ability to identify AI-generated content as practically a coin toss. On top of the "Seems like AI slop" button, Srinivasan also said that LinkedIn would be "ramping up a series of new and improved classifiers that identify if a post is AI-slop or generally low-quality content" and that the platform would be retiring its AI-driven "enhance your post" feature to replace it with an AI tool that proofreads but keeps your voice intact. Expect to see less slop in your LinkedIn feed, the executive promised.

LinkedIn Introduces a 'Seems Like AI Slop' Button

Following 404 Media's reporting on how LinkedIn is full of AI slop, the platform is giving users a chance to report it when they see it. LinkedIn, a social network awash with long AI-generated posts from executives and other corporate workers, has introduced a new button that users can click to flag if a post "seems like AI slop," according to 404 Media's own tests. If you have been anywhere near LinkedIn in the past couple of years, you have undoubtedly seen users posting blatantly AI-generated missives. Often these posts take some sort of news event, and opine on how this relates to thought leadership, or some other LinkedIn brainrot term. It's also pretty wild the button specifically uses the term "AI slop" and not, say, "It seems this was generated with AI." Here's what the button looks like, available when a user clicks on the three dots at the top of a post: I scrolled for about six seconds before finding a post that sure looked like AI slop, based on the gratuitous spacing between single sentences, lists of takeaways, emoji use, and "X is not Y" sentence construction. When I clicked the "seems like AI slop button," LinkedIn told me, "Thanks for letting us know. Your feedback helps improve the feed." It then hid the post itself. Earlier this month, 404 Media reported that AI detection service Pangram estimated 41 percent of long form posts and 30 percent of short form posts on LinkedIn are likely AI generated. (Disclosure: Pangram previously ran an advertisement on 404 Media.) If you Google "linkedin AI" or similar, there are a ton of guides -- some on LinkedIn itself -- telling people how to use AI to write their LinkedIn posts. There is of course some irony in that LinkedIn itself has generative AI features. Its AI-powered writing assistant helps people "share personalized suggestions for your profile, to help you stand out and get noticed," according to LinkedIn's website. After publication of this piece, Hari Srinivasan, chief product officer at LinkedIn, wrote their own post about the button. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas and expertise. Here are a few more changes to keep it that way," he wrote. The button in part will help LinkedIn tune its own models for identifying AI slop. "We are ramping up a series of new and improved classifiers that identify if a post is AI-slop or generally low-quality content. This will reduce the amount of AI slop you might see in suggested content and content from outside your network," the post said. "We are ramping the ability for members to tell us if they believe a post or comment seems like AI slop. Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds." Srinivasan also said LinkedIn is removing the AI-powered "enhance your post" feature with another that "proofreads your words, but does not change your voice." When previously asked for comment about the Pangram report, LinkedIn said it was taking steps to crack down on AI slop, and referred us to a policy change it made in May designed to disincentivize slop: "Professionals come to LinkedIn to hear from real people and their unique insights and perspectives. We actively work to reduce low quality, automated or generic content, and while AI can be used to beat the blank page problem, our focus is on surfacing professional conversations that help people advance their careers." Update: this piece has been updated to include a post from LinkedIn.

I can't believe it's taken LinkedIn so long to push back against AI slop -- but will its changes really stop all the cringey updates?

LinkedIn, one of the most notorious bastions of AI slop online today, is finally cracking down on the deluge being seen across its site. The social network is introducing a range of controls as it looks to turn off the tap of the torrent of AI slop increasingly dominating its website. You can try it now - just click on the three dots at the top-right of any LinkedIn post, and among the usual options to save, share or embed, you'll see a new option - "Seems like AI slop". My only question is - what took you so long? "We really care about this" In a LinkedIn post of his own, Hari Srinivasan, CPO at the company, explained the reasoning behind the roll-out in words which should be music to the ears of most LinkedIn users. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this," he declared. "People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas and expertise." Now, I try and keep my LinkedIn feed fairly professional - like many of us, I do try and use it for work purposes, after all. But the odd slop does slip in every now and then - usually 3rd-level connections trying to shill some crypto scam, or religious-themed pep talk. I have to say, it's incredibly satisfying to click the "Seems like AI slop' and relegate such posts to the dustbin of history - much more so than LinkedIn's previous system of reporting posts which may have sounded like scams or spam, but often just disappeared into silence. As Srinivasan explained on the new reporting tools, "Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds." "We asked ourselves why do people post with AI anyway? The answer is LinkedIn isn't a one-word kind of place and they feel more confident running their posts through AI. We're taking this learning, removing the 'enhance your post' feature you see when you write a post or message & replacing with a feature that proofreads your words, but does not change your voice." Hopefully they more we use the tool, the smarter it will get - and cut down on the stuff we don't want to see. The action goes two ways though - and LinkedIn will also be testing a way for admins and members to see in their analytics dashboard when your own content has been flagged as potential slop. Let's hope this is a bit more regulated - we don't want online vigilantes carrying out campaigns against a company or person they may have a vendetta against. Srinivasan says the approach is based on two learnings - "First, AI and slop are not the same thing; many people refine thoughts with AI, and we believe they want to know when they sound inauthentic. Second, we want members to get feedback from real humans on what sounds authentic - not just have an AI detector review it and get it wrong." Srinivasan also noted that LinkedIn (which let us remember is owned by Microsoft) will "continue to improve and invest in our automation defences..on comments alone, everyday we are now catching hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts, and have blocked billions of other automation attempts (posting at scale, slop) in the last couple months alone." This is a very welcome first step by LinkedIn, and lets just hope it's the start of an ongoing crusade against AI slop - because no one wants to see any of that anymore. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.

'Seems Like AI Slop' Button Added to LinkedIn

One of the most frustrating aspects of online discourse in 2026 is not knowing whether the email, social media post, or video you just read or watched was AI-generated. Despite growing infrastructure being put in place that can detect synthetic content, many online users are suspicious about virtually all digital artifacts nowadays. But now users on LinkedIn can act on those suspicions after the business-focused social media platform added a "seems like AI slop" button to posts. LinkedIn's Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan says that AI slop is a top priority for the platform. "We are ramping up a series of new and improved classifiers that identify if a post is AI-slop or generally low-quality content," Srinivasan writes. "This will reduce the amount of AI slop you might see in suggested content and content from outside your network." "We are ramping the ability for members to tell us if they believe a post or comment seems like AI slop. Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds," he adds. The Scourge of AI Bots LinkedIn has been getting a reputation for vacuous posts that were clearly written by an LLM. Some of them are generated automatically by bots, which is a major issue for all platforms. But companies are fighting back: this month, Substack added a tool that supposedly identifies when an email newsletter has been written by AI. The problem of agentic bots is huge. Cloudflare, a company that provides internet infrastructure, says that website traffic from bots now outnumbers traffic from human users. Detecting AI slop on visual platforms like Instagram and TikTok is a little easier compared to written text. That is mainly due to two systems: Google's SynthID and the C2PA protocol. The former is an invisible watermark that's imperceptible to humans but shifts pixels in such a way that it is detectable to Google's tools. C2PA, meanwhile, is a cryptographically signed manifest that logs a piece of media's provenance, recording information like the camera used to create the image, whether AI was used, and what edits were made to it. Image creditsHeader photo licensed via Depositphotos.

LinkedIn to add AI slop report feature that could train better AI slop

Credit: Timon Schneider / SOPA Images / LightRocket via Getty Images LinkedIn will soon enable users to flag posts which appear to be "AI slop." However, the career-focused social media platform won't be using this data to remove or even discourage AI-generated posts. Rather, it appears the company will use the feedback to train its own algorithms. The upcoming update was announced on Thursday, with LinkedIn's chief product officer Hari Srinivasan stating that AI slop is a "top priority" for the company. "We are ramping [up] the ability for members to tell us if they believe a post or comment seems like AI slop," Srinivasan wrote in a post on the platform. "Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds." It's unclear exactly what he means by making LinkedIn's feeds "better," but it's unlikely that it involves the complete absence of generative AI. Srinivasan went on to express the belief that AI-generated posts and AI slop are not synonymous, arguing that people use AI to "refine their thoughts." As such, flagging AI-generated posts on LinkedIn could potentially deprioritise such content. Srinivasan further stated that LinkedIn is adding new classifiers to help identify AI slop and will reduce the amount shown in suggested content. However, it seems likely that the data will also help train LinkedIn's generative AI, so that its AI-generated content is less detectable. LinkedIn previously offered a relatively unpopular "AI-powered writing tool" that allowed users to generate posts for the platform. This feature was removed alongside Thursday's announcement, with Srinivasan stating that it will be replaced with a proofreading tool. Even so, it's probable that the upcoming feature will also use generative AI, with Srinivasan specifically noting that it will not change the users' voice. The platform also still offers AI-generated suggestions for users updating their profiles or company pages. LinkedIn's AI slop report feature doesn't just have the potential to help the platform refine its own algorithms either. Srinivasan noted that users who publish AI-generated content on LinkedIn will also be informed when others tag their posts as AI slop, offering the feedback so they can work on making their AI-generated content sound more "authentic." "For anyone who shares content, we will test a way to privately flag, in your analytics dashboard, when members feel your post may have come off as inauthentic or heavy use of AI," wrote Srinivasan. ""[W]e believe [AI users] want to know when they sound inauthentic.... [W]e want members to get feedback from real humans on what sounds authentic -- not just have an AI detector review it and get it wrong." Earlier this month, AI detection tool Pangram published a study that found over 40 percent of longform posts on LinkedIn were completely AI-generated.

LinkedIn adds a 'seems like AI slop' button after blocking billions of automated comment attempts in the last few months | Fortune

While the rest of the online world is increasingly being shaped by AI, LinkedIn is making it easier to flag any low-quality "AI slop" that has crept its way onto the platform. On Thursday, the professional networking platform added a "Seems like AI slop" button, which will appear when a user clicks on the options button on a post, and will help users flag posts they believe are low-quality or overreliant on AI. "Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds," said LinkedIn chief product officer Hari Srinivasan in a post announcing the feature. The company is also removing its "enhance your post" tool, replacing it with a feature that proofreads posts without changing a user's voice, while reinforcing profile and page verifications. In addition, LinkedIn has stepped up its bot detection. Srinivasan said the company detects and blocks hundreds of thousands of automated slop comment attempts every day, and has prevented "billions of other automation attempts (posting at scale, slop) in the last couple months alone." At the same time, he clarified that using AI isn't always bad, noting that many people refine their thoughts with AI and that the new "AI slop" tool would also let users know when their post sounds "inauthentic." "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this," Srinivasan said in his post Thursday. LinkedIn's new feature comes as AI-written content has proliferated online since the release of ChatGPT in 2022. A recent study by AI text detection tool Pangram found 40% of long-form posts and 30% of short form posts on LinkedIn were flagged as fully AI-generated. When reached for comment, a LinkedIn spokesperson directed Fortune to Srinivasan's public post. Cracking down on AI slop Other companies have started cracking down on AI-generated content as well. Snapchat on Friday announced it would no longer recommend fully AI-generated videos through its Spotlight feature, which highlights videos from users across the app. The new restriction will not apply to videos that were edited or enhanced using Snapchat's own AI creative tools, though these videos will include transparency indicators, the company added. "As low-quality, repetitive, AI-generated content becomes increasingly common across the internet, we want Spotlight to remain a place where people can discover authentic creativity from real people," the company said in a statement. Other companies have gone in a different direction. Meta has leaned into AI-generated content by developing its own family of generative media models. Earlier this month, the Facebook and Instagram parent launched Muse Image, which can create AI-generated images based on a variety of references, "including people, objects, clothing, styles, and environments," the company said in an announcement. Alongside Muse Image, it also released a preview of Muse Video, which allows users to create AI-generated video. Images created with Muse Image include an invisible watermarking system called "Content Seal" to identify them even if they are cropped, resized, or screenshotted. The company plans to extend its "content seal" system to Muse Video soon, it said in an announcement. During Meta's second-quarter earnings call this week, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Muse Image and Muse Video would "dramatically expand the universe of content that people can discover across our platform." "This is going to make our services a lot more useful and engaging for people," he said during his prepared remarks.

LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop

The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated. LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears. The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own. A crowdsourced slop detector Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan laid out the changes in a recent LinkedIn post, saying AI slop has become a top priority for the company because users come to the platform for real perspectives and expertise, not generated text. He said LinkedIn now catches hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts every day, and has blocked billions of other automation attempts, including large-scale slop posting, over the past couple of months. The new flagging button feeds directly into that effort, alongside improved classifiers meant to catch AI slop and low-quality posts before they reach people outside the poster's network. Srinivasan acknowledged that slop is hard to define and that the definition keeps shifting, which is part of why LinkedIn wants user reports to strengthen its automated detection. A tool to coach users instead of penalizing them LinkedIn is also testing a private dashboard flag that tells members when their posts come across as inauthentic or heavy on AI. The tool is meant to give users a chance to adjust their approach, instead of penalizing them outright. Srinivasan said the flag runs on signals from users rather than an automated AI detector, since plenty of people use AI to refine their thinking without producing slop and deserve accurate feedback instead of getting incorrectly flagged by a detection tool. Recommended Videos The company is also retiring its "enhance your post" AI writing feature and replacing it with a proofreading tool that fixes grammar without altering the user's voice. It's a subtle acknowledgement that the feature LinkedIn once pushed for writing help likely contributed to the flood of AI-sounding posts it's now trying to clean up, even if that's not how Srinivasan framed the decision. LinkedIn isn't alone in this fight against AI slop. Substack also rolled out a tool earlier this month that flags AI-written newsletters for readers. Whether such tools can successfully curb the spread of AI slop remains to be seen.

LinkedIn Adds Button on Every Post to Report "Seems Like AI Slop," Which Is Definitely Going to Get a Real Workout

Can't-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Perhaps more so than any other social media platform, LinkedIn has been inundated with lazy AI-generated brainrot content. It has become the AI slop "punching bag," a repository of painful engagement bait being spewed out by an army of bots who seem at times to mainly be lobbing business platitudes at one another. Just last week, Substack CEO Chris Best took aim at the Microsoft-owned career site when he announced the launch of an AI detector feature "because we're sick of slop and we don't want Substack to turn into LinkedIn." According to AI detection company Pangram, a shocking two thirds of LinkedIn posts are showing up as being AI generated by users of its browser extension. More than 40 percent of longform posts were flagged as "fully AI-generated," according to the company. Credit where credit's due: LinkedIn has seemingly caught on to the abysmal state of its service, quietly introducing a new button that allows users to flag a post that "seems like AI slop." "Genuinely thought it was a joke until I clicked on a few posts," one user wrote in a Bluesky post after discovering the feature. It's a baffling move, but probably well intentioned. Whether LinkedIn will act on what will likely be a massive influx of flagged posts remains to be seen, however. Once flagged, the post becomes hidden to the user, but it's unclear whether somebody at LinkedIn will review it. As 404 Media points out, the inclusion of the new button is particularly surprising, because LinkedIn is simultaneously encouraging users to generate AI slop through an AI-powered writing assistant. "LinkedIn's AI-powered writing assistant will share personalized suggestions for your profile, to help you stand out and get noticed," the company's website reads. "The AI-powered suggestions are personalized based on your profile information and incorporate insights from analyzing millions of profiles." The company also started scraping user data without permission to train so-called AI "coworkers" last year, a dubious experiment that was shut down almost immediately. It's clear that the subject of AI is proving divisive in the LinkedIn c-suite. In a May 20 update, LinkedIn promised that it was looking to keep "conversations real" by keeping "AI slop" at bay. "When AI is overused, especially at scale and in an automated way, it dilutes the valuable insights that real human conversations can spark," LinkedIn executive editor Laura Lorenzetti wrote in the update. "It's ok to use AI to help you write, but your posts and comments need to represent your voice and your perspectives. The ultimate value comes from the human behind the tool." To allegedly "strengthen authenticity," LinkedIn is working on "technology systems" that "have been trained to recognize signals of AI slop," according to Lorenzetti. Judging by the latest news, it's looking to leverage its own frustrated user base to stop LinkedIn from drowning in a bot-infested sea of slop. Only time will tell if it's too late. More on LinkedIn: AI "Coworkers" Profiles Prove Too Stupid Even For LinkedIn

LinkedIn's new anti-slop button is coming to every platform

The button, which debuted the week of July 27, allows users to flag content on LinkedIn that they believe may be "AI slop." The option appears in a three-dot menu in the top right of any post, and shows a diamond with an exclamation point, followed by the phrase, "Seems like AI slop." In a post to the platform on July 30, Hari Srinivasan, LinkedIn's chief product officer, explained that the button will help LinkedIn "tune our models and make better feeds." It's just one part of the brand's overall strategy to reduce AI slop or "generally low-quality content." Essentially, LinkedIn is using an AI-versus-AI approach by training its own detection models to distinguish between content that contains original thinking and content that's just regurgitating existing thinking. As AI-written content begins to take over social media, platforms like LinkedIn are faced with the challenge of bringing human ideas back to the surface. For several sites, that means baking AI detection and mediation features directly into the UX, allowing individual users to have some say in how AI content is handled.

LinkedIn cracks down on users posting 'AI slop' after previously encouraging it

Microsoft Corp.'s LinkedIn is making a concerted effort to combat "AI slop," or the low-quality, artificial intelligence-generated content that has been increasingly dominating user's feeds. In a blog post today, LinkedIn Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan revealed that the company is adding a new "seems like AI slop" button for people to report posts that appear to be AI-generated. The new button can be found in the ellipsis menu on all LinkedIn posts now, and will be coming to user's comments too. According to Srinivasan, it will provide a way for users to report suspect posts and also help the company to train its AI-spotting AI models to enhance the quality of content found in user's feeds. The company isn't stopping there, either. In addition, Srinivasan said LinkedIn is dropping the "enhance your post" button that uses AI to tweak user's wording. It's believed that this button probably encouraged a lot of the AI slop now found across LinkedIn's feeds, so it's being replaced by an option to simply have AI proofread what users have written, while leaving their natural voice intact. The updates reflect a growing trend among online platforms to push back against AI-generated content as human users become more disgruntled by the inauthentic, computer-generated posts that now pop up seemingly everywhere they go online. Last week, for example, the popular newsletter platform Substack added a new tool that allows readers to scan new posts they're reading to see if they were likely written by an AI model, in partnership with a startup called Pangram Labs Inc. Then, this week, Pangram revealed that it has raised $9 million in funding to try and stem the tsunami of AI content that's now flooding the internet. AI-generated content is a big and growing problem, and it's hard to find anyone who hasn't come across some kind of AI slop on platforms such as Facebook, Reddit, Quora, Instagram, TikTok or whatever social media apps they use. It's deeply unpopular, because so many people regard AI-generated content as unreliable drivel that betrays a total lack of creativity on behalf of the poster and reduces the overall quality of both platforms and impacts user's experiences. LinkedIn is a particular concern, with one 2024 study finding that just over half of all long-form posts published on the site were likely faux thought leadership posts and similar slop. It has likely gotten worse in the meantime, as Srinivasan made clear in his blog post. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us," he wrote. "We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas and expertise." The executive said the "Seems like AI slop" button is just one of several measures being introduced to try and eliminate AI content from LinkedIn. The company is also investing in automated defenses that, ironically, use AI to block "hundreds of thousands" of automated comments each day. In addition, Srinivasan talked about the introduction of new classifiers to identify if certain posts are AI slop or some other kind of low-quality content. The idea with this is to reduce the overall amount of AI content recommendations from people outside of user's own networks. The Seems like AI slop button will be one of several signals LinkedIn uses to inform its classifiers, Srinivasan said. In addition, LinkedIn will also start flagging user's dashboards privately when it thinks they're using AI too heavily and their content seems "inauthentic." Srinivasan said this is meant to encourage users to improve their writing in cases where they simply use AI to enhance what they've written, rather than target users who post entirely AI-generated posts.

LinkedIn lets users red flag avalanche of AI slop

LinkedIn has given Australian users the power to report AI slop. On Friday, the professional networking site started allowing Australian users to flag "low-effort, likely AI-generated content that may sound polished on the surface but lacks a clear point of view, unique perspective, or substance" using a "seems like AI slop" button. The option came days after subscription newsletter platform Substack introduced a tool to detect AI writing, as social media companies grapple with growing frustration about the omnipresence of AI posts on their platforms.

LinkedIn moves to reduce AI-generated content

LinkedIn is testing a reporting option that lets users flag posts as "seems like AI slop" and is removing some of its own AI writing features. The new tool will allow users to privately flag posts through LinkedIn's analytics dashboard if they believe a post appears inauthentic or relies heavily on AI, LinkedIn Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan said in an update. Posts flagged through the new tool will see reduced algorithmic reach, similar to posts users mark as "not interested," a LinkedIn spokesperson said. Srinivasan said the change follows an earlier effort to reduce the reach of AI-generated posts on the platform. He said LinkedIn has since improved its detection systems, which should result in fewer AI-generated posts being recommended in users' feeds. LinkedIn is also removing built-in AI writing tools that let users "enhance" posts and messages with large language models. Srinivasan said the company will replace them with a narrower feature that "proofreads your words, but does not change your voice." The changes come as LinkedIn faces mounting volumes of AI-generated content. A recent study by AI detection company Pangram found LinkedIn was "the most AI-saturated" social media platform, with more than 40% of long-form posts flagged as fully AI-generated. LinkedIn has also been dealing with automated posting by AI bots. Srinivasan said the company caught "hundreds of thousands" of automated comments and blocked billions of other automated posting attempts in the last few months.

LinkedIn adds a 'seems like AI slop' report button for AI-generated posts

As part of a series of updates to reduce the volume of AI slop on the platform, LinkedIn has introduced a button that lets users flag posts as "seems like AI slop." This makes it one of the first major social platforms to give users a direct tool to push back against AI-generated content. The feature is part of a broader set of measures LinkedIn is rolling out to address what its chief product officer Hari Srinivasan called a "top priority." AI detection company Pangram found that more than 40% of long-form LinkedIn posts were flagged as fully AI-generated, with LinkedIn described as the most AI-saturated social media platform. Nearly two-thirds of all AI-generated long-form social media posts were found on LinkedIn specifically. With the new update, whenever a user clicks the new button, the flagged post disappears from their feed. LinkedIn will also privately notify posters through their account dashboard that their content may have come across as inauthentic. Srinivasan said that the goal is not to judge content but to give creators feedback from real humans rather than relying solely on automated AI detectors. The reports will also feed into LinkedIn's internal models, allowing it to better identify and reduce AI slop in suggested content and recommendations from outside users' networks. The company says it has already blocked hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts daily and billions of other automation attempts in recent months. LinkedIn is also removing its own "Enhance with AI" post writing feature, replacing it with a lighter proofreading tool that refines spelling and grammar without rewriting a user's voice entirely. Other improvements include expanding access to profile and page verification tools and adding an option to block comments from company pages you no longer want to see.

LinkedIn Just Added a Button to Report 'AI Slop.' There's Just 1 Problem

On July 30, LinkedIn added a new feature that let users click a "seems like AI slop" button when someone's post appears to have been written with AI. The company says it will use that feedback to determine how much reach a post will get outside of the poster's network. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us," wrote Hari Srinivasan, chief product officer at LinkedIn, in a post that hopefully wasn't written using AI. "We really care about this. People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas and expertise." While the goal of the AI slop labeling button seems good, some parties remain suspicious, particularly because LinkedIn's parent company, Microsoft, has a vested financial interest in the success of artificial intelligence.

Microsoft Lets Users Report Slop After Spending $41 Billion On AI

LinkedIn is a social networking site for professionals. It used to be quite boring, but now people have found it's a great place to try to earn business brain clout by going there and dumping AI slop. Microsoft, which purchased LinkedIn in 2016, has decided to acknowledge the scourge of the "What losing my childhood Golden Retriever to pancreatic cancer taught me about B2B sales"-style chum on the platform with a new button that flags it as AI slop. Instead of just reporting your ex-boss's posts as spam, you can now tag them with "seems like AI slop." The move comes after AI detector startup Pangram recently claimed that over 40 percent of long-form posts on LinkedIn are AI garbage. Pangram has its own problems, but the publicity forced Microsoft to reckon with something anyone who has come within three clicks of LinkedIn has known for months. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us," chief product officer Hari Srinivasan says in a post (via The Verge). "We really care about this." In a post definitely not written with the help of AI, he continued, "We are ramping the ability for members to tell us if they believe a post or comment seems like AI slop. Slop is hard to define and the definition changes; this lets us tune our models and make better feeds." One of the ironies of this whole thing is that LinkedIn had built in an "enhance your post" feature to achieve exactly this outcome of slop-ifying the platform. It's now walking that back. Just "proofreads" now. "We asked ourselves why do people post with AI anyway?" Srinivasan wrote. "The answer is LinkedIn isn't a one-word kind of place and they feel more confident running their posts through AI. We're taking this learning, removing the 'enhance your post' feature you see when you write a post or message & replacing with a feature that proofreads your words, but does not change your voice." Attempts to de-slopify LinkedIn come right as Microsoft reported $35.8 billion in profit for the quarter after spending $41 billion on capital investments, including building out its data center infrastructure to service the AI revolution everyone swears will improve our lives any day now. What does Microsoft think the AI is being used for? Surely not a bubble that's making its gaming hardware unaffordable and the broader internet unreadable in the meantime. "We need to get beyond the arguments of slop vs sophistication and develop a new equilibrium in terms of our 'theory of the mind' that accounts for humans being equipped with these new cognitive amplifier tools as we relate to each other," CEO Satya Nadella wrote back in January. "This is the product design question we need to debate and answer." Unfortunately he didn't post it on LinkedIn so there's no "seems like AI slop" button to press.

That cringey LinkedIn post? You can now report it as 'AI slop'

LinkedIn is pushing back against lengthy, low-quality posts generated with AI, also known as "AI slop," that users have become accustomed to seeing in their feeds. The career-building and social networking site just added a button to easily allow users to report such content for review. Now, when LinkedIn users are scrolling through posts and find one that they believe is AI, they can tap the three dots next to a post and in the menu that populates, the option "seems like AI slop" will appear. When users click the button, the post will be hidden and a message will appear that reads: "Thanks for letting us know. Your feedback helps improve the feed." After 404 Media first reported the innovation, LinkedIn's chief product officer Hari Srinivasan posted an explanation on Thursday about why it's important for the site to combat AI slop. Srinivasan wrote that the site is a place "with real people" who share their real perspectives, ideas and expertise" and said LinkedIn will make it easier than ever to flag posts that seem "inauthentic" or rely on "heavy use of AI" with the new button.

LinkedIn's Hari Srinivasan outlines new measures to curb AI slop, automated activity

LinkedIn is strengthening automation defenses and detecting many automated comment attempts daily. The platform is deploying improved classifiers to identify slop and low quality content. Member feedback mechanisms will expand to flag AI-generated or inauthentic posts. LinkedIn will also test features privately alerting creators about content perception. Profile and page verification is expanding to enhance user trust and transparency. LinkedIn is introducing a series of measures to address AI generated 'slop', automated activity, and low quality content on the platform, according to a post by Hari Srinivasan, chief product officer, LinkedIn Ecosystem, on Friday. Srinivasan said LinkedIn is strengthening its automation defences and is detecting hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts every day. The company has also blocked billions of other such automated attempts,

For Months, LinkedIn Users Complained About AI Slop. The Company Just Responded With a Massive Change

On the platform, users can now flag a post they believe shows heavy AI use. This feature comes on the heels of the company's embrace of AI, in which it added AI tools to help members rewrite posts and content. Now, it seems to be cracking down on AI use. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us. We really care about this," Hari Srinivasan, the company's chief product officer, wrote in an update. "People come to LinkedIn to connect with real people and share their real perspectives, ideas and expertise."

"Seems like AI slop": A new way to report machine-generated posts in LinkedIn

The Microsoft-owned job platform is trying to stop the flood of AI-generated posts. LinkedIn is now adding a report option for posts that "seem like AI slop." Users can now flag posts that feel heavily AI-generated or inauthentic, with LinkedIn hiding the post after the report and using the feedback to improve its feed. As it's a newly-introduced feature, and as we have been able to confirm, it has not yet been translated into languages such as Spanish. The move is part of a wider crackdown on low-quality AI content on LinkedIn, where more and more "user" posts feel like they have not been written by the original, human authors. LinkedIn says it is using new classifiers to detect AI slop and reduce how often this kind of content appears in suggested posts or from outside users' networks. In other words, reducing their visibility. LinkedIn is also changing its own AI writing tools, as the platform is removing an AI "enhance" feature that could rewrite posts and replacing it with a lighter proofreading tool designed to preserve the user's own voice. Time will tell where it's ideal to draw the line and how many genuinely human posts end up impacted and, conversely, how many machine-written publications get away.

LinkedIn's Feed Is 41% Fake and the Cleanup Starts Now | PYMNTS.com

More than 40% of LinkedIn posts longer than 250 words are fully artificial intelligence-generated, according to AI detection company Pangram. The company looked at more than 1 million posts across LinkedIn, Medium, Reddit, Substack and social platform X. It found that LinkedIn had the most long-form AI content. Substack had one of the lowest rates of any platform for long-form content, with roughly 20% of its posts flagged as AI-generated or AI-assisted, Pangram said. Reddit's overall rate looked even lower, just 4.4% combined, but that number is misleading. It's driven almost entirely by Reddit's replies, which were 98.1% human-written and made up most of what Pangram scanned on the platform. Reddit's own top-level posts, the ones actually comparable to a LinkedIn post or a Substack piece, were AI-generated at a similar rate to X. Platforms are racing to fight back against the AI slop. Substack launched an AI detection feature on July 21 built with Pangram, letting readers scan any post, note, comment or reply of more than 100 words published on or after that date to see an estimated split between human-written and AI-generated text, according to a July 21 company blog post written by Substack CEO Chris Best. LinkedIn followed Thursday (July 30), with LinkedIn Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan announcing a "Seems like AI slop" reporting button, accessible from the three-dot menu on a post. "We are ramping up a series of new and improved classifiers that identify if a post is AI-slop or generally low-quality content," Srinivasan said in a Thursday LinkedIn post. "This will reduce the amount of AI slop you might see in suggested content and content from outside your network." LinkedIn Is Asking Users to Flag AI Slop Themselves LinkedIn is attempting to ensure that when users visit the platform, they connect with real people and share real perspectives, Srinivasan said in the post. The company blocks hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts daily. "AI slop is a top priority for all of us," he said in the post. "We really care about this." Every report becomes training data for classifiers, reducing how often flagged content appears in posts suggested to people outside a poster's existing network. LinkedIn is also retiring its own "Enhance your post" AI writing tool for a more conservative proofreading feature that preserves a user's original voice, Srinivasan said in the post. The company will privately notify users when their content reads as inauthentic due to heavy AI use. Substack put the detection tool in the reader's hands rather than routing everything through moderation. Readers scan a post and see a percentage breakdown; creators can add a "How I make this" disclosure, disable detection on individual posts, or dispute a result, according to Substack's support documentation. In the July 21 blog post, CEO Best framed the launch around the specific fear that Substack could drift toward what LinkedIn had become. "When content made by no one takes over parts of the internet that are supposed to be human, it pollutes the commons and makes it hard to discover and hear human voices," he said. A Flawed Detector Is Still Better Than No Detector Neither company claimed certainty. Pangram's scores are estimates based on stylistic patterns, not proof of how text was produced. Independent researchers found that some AI-generated text can read as human to detectors. The business logic is more straightforward than the detection technology. A social platform's product is attention; a newsletter platform's product is subscriber trust. Both erode when readers cannot tell a human voice from a mass-produced one. Online news aggregator Digg shut down its Reddit-competitor product in March, citing an inability to keep pace with bot-driven content, The Verge reported March 13. Meanwhile, Cloudflare has said automated bot traffic on the web now exceeds human traffic, a threshold it reached earlier than forecast, NBC News reported in June. LinkedIn and Substack are betting that the platforms that survive the next phase of generative AI will be the ones that can prove a real person is still on the other side of the post. For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter.

LinkedIn's New Perfectly Named 'Seems Like AI Slop' Button Won't Save PC Gaming, but It'll Certainly Help Against Bot-Generated Garbage

As if millions of "Top Voices" suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. Social media sites are overrun with AI slop, churned out ad nauseum by increasingly ubiquitous AI tools that happen to have the lovely side effect of driving up the price of gaming hardware. At least one site has had enough, and it's... LinkedIn, of all places. LinkedIn has become practically unusable in recent months if you don't have an appetite for low-effort "thought leadership" posts that just reek of AI slop. The kind of emoji-filled viral-bait that makes you say "man, this sure seems like it was written by an AI." Well, the Microsoft-owned professional networking site today introduced a new reporting button that's marvelous in its simplicity. Now, alongside options to Save, Share, or Report a post is a new "Seems like AI slop" button. Perfect. No notes. According to a post from LinkedIn Chief Product Officer Hari Srinivasan, reporting via the button will help train LinkedIn's own AI tools to better identify AI slop. No, the irony is not lost on me. (And never mind that LinkedIn itself at one point touted its own AI-powered writing assistant. We're certainly not all trying to find the guy who did this.) Regardless, Srinivasan says the goal is to reduce the amount of AI slop people see on their feeds. There are some genuinely useful and interesting applications for AI, like improving frame rates or building NPCs that can have actual conversations, but churning out slop is not one of them. I can only hope that other social media networks follow suit. Unfortunately, even if LinkedIn (and other sites) were to ban AI content entirely, it would still likely have little impact on the total AI infrastructure buildout that has caused surging RAM prices and made gaming hardware more inaccessible than ever. But at least our feeds would be a little bit more human, and that I call a win. Bo Moore is IGN's Senior Manager of Tech. You can find him online @usebomswisely.