LinkedIn Removes AI Writing Tool, Adds 'AI Slop' Button to Combat Generic Content Flood

LinkedIn's Initiative to Address AI Content

LinkedIn has taken decisive action against AI-generated content flooding its professional networking platform by introducing a "seems like AI slop" reporting button that allows users to flag posts appearing AI-written1

1

. The Microsoft-owned network simultaneously removed its own AI writing assistant and replaced it with a proofreading tool that preserves individual writing styles1

1

. Oscar Rodriguez, LinkedIn's vice president of product, confirmed that AI slop has become a top priority for the company, which now blocks hundreds of thousands of automated comment attempts daily1

1

.

The Scale of AI-Generated Content on LinkedIn

AI detection firms have revealed concerning statistics about the prevalence of AI-generated content on the platform. Pangram Labs analyzed nearly 57,000 pieces of content and found that 41% of LinkedIn's long-form public posts and 30% of public comments were entirely AI-generated between April and June2

2

. This concentration proved higher than X at 29% and Reddit at 13%2

2

. Originality.ai reached an even more striking conclusion after reviewing 5,000 public LinkedIn posts in July, determining that 81% showed more than a moderate amount of AI use2

2

. While LinkedIn disputed these research findings, the company did not share comparable results of its own2

2

.

Why Curbing AI-Generated Content Matters

The stakes are particularly high for LinkedIn, which positions itself as a trusted destination for useful information, professional relationships, and career opportunities for its more than one billion members2

2

. Brendan Gahan, co-founder and CEO of Creator Authority, a LinkedIn influencer marketing agency, noted that "everybody uses AI to some degree" but advises influencers to avoid posting AI-generated content because it damages credibility2

2

. Success on the platform ultimately depends on credibility, making authenticity critical for user engagement2

2

.

The Broader Context of Platform Responses

LinkedIn's move follows Substack, which last week added a scanner from Pangram that estimates how much of a post was written by AI1

1

. Substack's CEO has described the appropriate use of AI as handling everything "except the hard part," where the hard part is having an idea worth sharing1

1

. These decisions arrive as Cloudflare reports that bots now generate 57% of web traffic to sites it hosts, a level not expected until 20271

1

. Most major social media platforms have attempted to curb AI-generated posts through automated labels, though this approach has a spotty record, sometimes mislabeling human-generated content as AI2

2

. Social media creator Nikolai Savic, who has five million followers on TikTok, experienced this firsthand when TikTok labeled his painstakingly edited videos as AI-generated, causing him to lose credibility with fans2

2

.

What LinkedIn's Strategy Signals

LinkedIn's decision to eliminate its own AI writing assistant is particularly telling. A platform that previously helped users generate posts has determined that generation itself was the problem1

1

. The replacement tool corrects grammar and returns the writing to users, sending a clear message: bring your own thinking, and let AI clean things up1

1

. Rodriguez acknowledged that LinkedIn has worked on low-quality content issues for a long time, including problems like oversharing and scam job posts, but AI is testing the platform on a much larger scale2

2

. Both LinkedIn and Substack are betting that users will find real human engagement more valuable than conversing with AI content generated mindlessly by other users1

1

.