3 Sources
[1]
Netflix under fire for 'weird as hell' AI recreation of murder victim's voice
TL;DR: Netflix's docuseries "American Murder: Gabby Petito" faces backlash for using AI to recreate Petito's voice. Critics call it unsettling and ethically questionable. Filmmaker Michael Gasparro defends the choice, but experts and viewers express discomfort with the technology's use for personal
[2]
Gabby Petito murder documentary sparks viewer backlash after it uses fake AI voiceover
This isn't the first occurrence of such debate, and it will likely keep happening as the technology improves. Netflix's latest true-crime docuseries, American Murder: Gabby Petito, has stirred up a heated debate over how to deploy AI to mimic the voices of people who have passed away. The
[3]
Netflix docuseries on Gabby Petito sparks backlash for AI use
One TikTok user said they felt "uneasy" after hearing her synthetic voice in the documentary. Catch up quick: Authorities say Petito's fiancé, Brian Laundrie, killed her after the two embarked on a cross-country road trip that she documented on social media. Between the lines: Filmmakers Julia
Share
Copy Link
Netflix's docuseries "American Murder: Gabby Petito" uses AI to recreate the victim's voice, igniting controversy over the ethical implications of using such technology in true crime narratives.

Netflix's latest true-crime docuseries, "American Murder: Gabby Petito," has ignited a heated debate over the use of artificial intelligence in recreating the voices of deceased individuals. The three-part series, which chronicles the tragic murder of 22-year-old Gabby Petito, employs AI-generated voice technology to narrate portions of the victim's personal writings, including journal entries and text messages
1
.The use of AI-generated voice in the documentary has sparked significant viewer backlash and raised ethical concerns. Many viewers have expressed discomfort with the technology, describing it as "unsettling," "weird as hell," and even "a violation"
1
. The controversy centers around the ethical implications of using AI to give voice to the deceased, particularly in the context of personal and private content.Merve Hickok, president of the Center for AI and Digital Policy, argues that while voice cloning can be acceptable for public content, it becomes problematic when used for personal material. "The person made a decision to keep that private," Hickok stated, emphasizing that such decisions should not be made on behalf of the deceased
1
.Despite the backlash, the filmmakers have defended their decision. Michael Gasparro, one of the documentary's creators, stated in an interview with Us Weekly that the AI narration brings Petito's story to life in a more powerful way. The team aimed to tell the story "as much through Gabby as possible," utilizing the wealth of her journals, notes, and online posts
2
.It's important to note that Netflix has confirmed obtaining permission from Petito's family to use the AI-generated voice
3
. However, this has not quelled the controversy surrounding the ethical implications of the technology's use.Related Stories
This incident is not isolated and reflects a growing trend in the use of AI-generated content in media. Similar controversies have arisen in other productions, such as the documentary "Roadrunner: A Film About Anthony Bourdain," which also used AI to recreate the late chef's voice
2
.As AI technology continues to advance, the entertainment industry is grappling with its potential applications and limitations. Some celebrities, like Robert Downey Jr., have expressed opposition to AI replication of their likeness, while others, such as James Earl Jones, have made arrangements for the use of their AI-generated voices under specific circumstances
2
.The controversy surrounding the Gabby Petito docuseries underscores the need for careful consideration of the ethical implications of AI use in storytelling, particularly when it involves real-life tragedies and personal narratives. As the technology becomes more sophisticated, it is likely that these debates will continue to shape the future of media production and consumption.
Summarized by
Navi
05 Aug 2025•Technology

30 Jun 2026•Entertainment and Society

17 Nov 2025•Entertainment and Society

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
