News Corp countersues Brave Software for scraping Wall Street Journal articles for AI training

2 Sources

Share

News Corp has filed a countersuit against search engine Brave Software, accusing it of unauthorized scraping and resale of copyrighted articles from the Wall Street Journal and New York Post to AI companies. The media giant seeks up to $150,000 per infringement, claiming Brave's practices fall outside fair use and threaten journalism's sustainable future.

News Corp Escalates Legal Battle Over Scraping Copyrighted Articles

News Corp has filed a countersuit against Brave Software in Oakland, California federal court, accusing the search engine of "flagrant theft" for distributing and selling versions of articles from the Wall Street Journal and New York Post to AI companies

1

. The countersuit against Brave Software comes after the San Francisco-based company preemptively sued the media giant in March 2025, seeking a court declaration that its practices were legal following a cease-and-desist letter from News Corp, led by the Murdoch family

2

.

Source: ET

Source: ET

In its Tuesday filing, News Corp alleges that Brave's unauthorized "covert scraping" and resale of its copyrighted articles fall "nowhere near the bounds" of legally acceptable conduct known as fair use

1

. The lawsuit argues that this practice directly undermines AI content licensing negotiations. "The more content Brave copies and sells, the more revenue it generates, and the less incentive AI companies have to negotiate licenses with the publishers who produced the content," the complaint states. "Brave profits while publishers are cut out"

2

.

Brave Defends Fair Use in AI Training Context

Brave Software revised its complaint in May 2026 following what News Corp characterized as failed negotiations for a "fair, market-based agreement"

1

. The search engine maintains that its indexing of News Corp content to make it searchable, and providing users with snippets and "high-level summaries" of that content, constitutes fair use under copyright law. Brave has positioned itself as the smallest of three U.S.-based companies operating independent search engines "at scale," competing in a market dominated by Google and Microsoft's Bing

2

.

The company accused News Corp of attempting to disrupt advances in generative AI, describing it as what "many consider the most important innovation so far this century"

1

. This framing suggests Brave views the legal dispute as part of a broader tension between traditional media and emerging AI technologies.

Financial Stakes and Industry Implications

News Corp is seeking an injunction to halt Brave's practices, along with unspecified monetary damages and statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringement

2

. The potential financial exposure could be substantial given the volume of articles allegedly scraped. News Corp Chief Executive Robert Thomson condemned what he termed "tacky tech trafficking," stating that Brave's actions reflect "blatant disregard" for the damage to how information is disseminated. "This era of tacky tech trafficking must come to an end if journalism is to have a sustainable future," Thomson declared

1

.

The competing lawsuits represent part of a broader wave of litigation pitting publishers against tech companies over the use of copyrighted content for AI development [2](https://economictimes.indiat, ies.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/news-corp-countersues-brave-for-allegedly-scraping-articles-for-ai/articleshow/132549428.cms). Beyond the Wall Street Journal and New York Post, the New York Post, Dow Jones, and News Corp's British and Australian operations are also defendants in Brave's lawsuit

1

. This case threatens the sustainability of journalism by potentially establishing precedents for how AI companies can access and monetize publisher content, affecting revenue models that news organizations depend on to fund reporting operations.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved