2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Crypto Firms Report Flood of AI-Driven Bug Bounty Submissions
HackerOne, one of the largest bug bounty platforms in the world, reported there were 85,000 valid bounty submissions in 2025, up 7% from the previous year. Crypto protocols have warned that an increase in AI use has led to a flood of bogus bug bounty submissions, putting a strain on teams trying to identify real threats to their protocols. Bug bounties are a system to reward "good" hackers for submitting reports about potential vulnerabilities and are popular in the crypto industry. AI has now made it easier to sift through large amounts of code to find possible bugs, though AI is also known to hallucinate. "AI is changing the way that bug bounty programs must operate," said Barry Plunkett, co-CEO of Cosmos Labs, on Tuesday, responding to a bug bounty hunter who accused the protocol of ignoring their vulnerability report. "Our program has seen a 900% increase in submission volume from last year, on the order of 20-50 per day," he said, adding that it's led to a huge increase in both valid and invalid reports. Kadan Stadelmann, a blockchain developer and chief technology officer at Komodo Platform, told Cointelegraph he has also seen a notable increase in bug bounty submissions and payouts across organizations. "There has definitely been an increase in low-quality bug bounty submissions, some of which have been false positives, potentially suggesting AI sourcing. One potential explanation is that AI has caused a decrease in the cost to produce a report, resulting in an influx of submissions." In January, Daniel Stenberg, the creator of the open-source data transfer tool curl, which is used in many apps, including blockchain infrastructure, announced he was ending his bug bounty program because of an influx of "AI slop in vulnerability reports," and he was exhausted from sifting through them. HackerOne, one of the largest bug bounty platforms in the world, reported in January that there were 85,000 valid bounty submissions in 2025, up 7% from the previous year. Plunkett said Cosmos Labs has already started to adapt its approach as a result of the uptick in bug bounty submissions by tightening how it scores submissions, prioritizing trusted researchers with a proven track record and working with other bug bounty providers that offer more advanced triage. Meanwhile, Stadelmann said bug bounty programs have proven integral to defending decentralized systems, and adopting AI to assist in sifting through the noise could be a solution. "Blockchain teams will have to create AI deterrents to sift through incoming bug bounties. The smaller the team, the bigger the problem of increased bug bounties will become. Software engineers won't have the capacity to examine everything," he said. "This is where defensive AI systems to automatically sift through incoming bug bounties will be crucial. Teams dependent on bug bounties will need to develop stricter standards on their bug bounty programs as a means of lowering the number of incoming reports."
[2]
AI flood drives surge in bogus crypto bug bounty reports
Crypto protocols are experiencing a surge in bogus bug bounty submissions due to increased use of AI, complicating efforts to identify genuine threats. Bug bounties reward ethical hackers for reporting vulnerabilities and are widely used in the crypto industry. While AI can efficiently scan large codebases for bugs, it also tends to generate inaccurate submissions. Barry Plunkett, co-CEO of Cosmos Labs, reported a 900% increase in bug bounty submissions, averaging between 20 and 50 per day. He noted that this uptick has resulted in a significant rise in both valid and invalid reports. "AI is changing the way that bug bounty programs must operate," Plunkett stated in response to concerns raised by a bug bounty hunter. Daniel Stenberg, creator of the open-source tool curl, announced in January the termination of his bug bounty program due to overwhelming quantities of "AI slop in vulnerability reports." Stenberg expressed frustration with the amount of time spent sifting through inauthentic submissions. HackerOne, a leading bug bounty platform, reported that there were 85,000 valid report submissions in 2025, a 7% increase compared to the previous year. This growth highlights the ongoing challenges faced by teams in managing bug bounty programs amid an increasing volume of submissions. In response, Cosmos Labs is modifying its approach by tightening submission scoring and prioritizing submissions from trusted researchers. Plunkett emphasized the need for collaboration with other providers to enhance submission triage processes.
Share
Share
Copy Link
Crypto protocols face a 900% surge in bug bounty submissions as AI tools generate both valid and fraudulent reports. Cosmos Labs receives 20-50 submissions daily, while curl creator Daniel Stenberg shut down his program entirely due to overwhelming AI slop in vulnerability reports.
The crypto industry is grappling with an unprecedented wave of AI-driven bug bounty submissions that threatens to overwhelm security teams tasked with identifying genuine vulnerabilities. Barry Plunkett, co-CEO of Cosmos Labs, revealed that his organization has experienced a staggering 900% increase in bug bounty submissions compared to the previous year, with the protocol now receiving between 20 and 50 reports daily
1
. This dramatic surge has led to a substantial rise in both valid and invalid reports, forcing crypto protocols to rethink how they manage their security programs.
Source: Cointelegraph
Bug bounty programs have long served as a critical defense mechanism in the crypto industry, rewarding ethical hackers for discovering and reporting security threats before malicious actors can exploit them. While AI has made it easier to scan large codebases for potential vulnerabilities, the technology's tendency to hallucinate has resulted in a flood of bogus crypto bug bounty reports that consume valuable resources
1
.The impact of AI-generated reports extends beyond the crypto sector. Daniel Stenberg, creator of the widely-used open-source data transfer tool curl, announced in January that he was shutting down his bug bounty program entirely due to exhaustion from sifting through what he described as "AI slop in vulnerability reports"
1
2
. His decision underscores the strain that AI-generated submissions are placing on developers and security teams across the technology landscape.Kadan Stadelmann, blockchain developer and chief technology officer at Komodo Platform, confirmed the trend, noting a marked increase in bug bounty submissions and payouts across organizations. "There has definitely been an increase in low-quality bug bounty submissions, some of which have been false positives, potentially suggesting AI sourcing," Stadelmann told Cointelegraph
1
. He attributed this phenomenon to AI reducing the cost of producing reports, resulting in an influx of submissions regardless of quality.HackerOne, one of the largest bug bounty platforms globally, reported 85,000 valid bounty submissions in 2025, representing a 7% increase from the previous year
1
2
. This growth highlights the dual challenge facing organizations: managing increased submission volume while maintaining the effectiveness of their security programs.In response to these pressures, Cosmos Labs has begun adapting its approach by tightening how it scores submissions, prioritizing trusted researchers with proven track records, and collaborating with other bug bounty providers that offer more advanced triage capabilities
1
2
. "AI is changing the way that bug bounty programs must operate," Plunkett stated, acknowledging the fundamental shift taking place in security operations1
.Related Stories
Stadelmann suggested that the solution to AI-generated noise might paradoxically lie in AI itself. He emphasized that bug bounty programs remain integral to defending decentralized systems and proposed that blockchain teams develop defensive AI systems to automatically filter incoming submissions. "Software engineers won't have the capacity to examine everything," he warned, noting that smaller teams will face the biggest challenges as submission volumes continue climbing
1
. Teams dependent on bug bounty programs will need to establish stricter standards to reduce the number of incoming reports while ensuring legitimate vulnerabilities don't slip through the cracks. As AI continues reshaping the security landscape, the crypto industry must balance accessibility for genuine researchers against the operational burden of straining security teams managing fraudulent bug bounty submissions.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
23 Jan 2026•Technology

11 Dec 2024•Technology

10 Mar 2026•Technology

1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Technology
