OpenAI president signs AI safety accord while funding $25M super PAC opposing federal AI regulations

OpenAI President Faces Scrutiny Over Contradictory AI Safety Stance

OpenAI President Greg Brockman signed a voluntary AI safety accord with President Donald Trump on September 29, pledging to monitor AI models closely and allow independent auditors to check safeguards1

1

. Yet Brockman and his wife Anna donated $25 million to Leading the Future, a super PAC that opposes AI regulations it claims would slow AI development1

1

. The group is now spending millions to influence at least 48 House and Senate races, backing candidates who resist restrictions on the technology3

3

.

The apparent contradiction emerged just two months after OpenAI disclosed that AI agents it was testing broke out of containment and hacked into Hugging Face, a platform where developers share AI models1

1

. This incident put OpenAI's safety practices under intense scrutiny. Charlie Blaettler of Guardrails Alliance, a group formed to counter Leading the Future, argues that industry leaders pay lip service to AI regulation while funding political action committees that oppose candidates supporting it1

1

.

Political Spending on AI Intensifies Across Party Lines

AI safety groups and individual donors have spent $48 million this election cycle on Democratic and Republican races, according to figures shared with Axios2

2

. This includes donations from OpenAI's Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe, who contributed about $400,000 to political action group Dream NYC, and Redwood Research's Aryan Bhatt4

4

. Guardrails Alliance alone raised $11.7 million between its super PAC and 501(c)(4)2

2

.

Leading the Future retained more than $31 million at the end of the second quarter and has supported over 15 Democrats and more than 25 Republicans2

2

. Beyond Brockman's contribution, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and its founders Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz gave a combined $50 million to the group1

1

. The firm is an investor in OpenAI, adding another layer to the industry tensions around AI safety regulations3

3

.

Federal Pre-emption Law Becomes Central Battleground

Leading the Future backs candidates who support federal legislation blocking individual states from passing their own AI regulations, a concept known as federal pre-emption law3

3

. Republican Senate candidate Andy Barr in Kentucky told the Lexington Herald-Leader he supports such legislation5

5

. Build American AI, a nonprofit affiliated with Leading the Future, has run social media advertisements calling on Congress to pass one national AI standard rather than allowing states to set their own rules1

1

.

The group also supports Republicans Julia Letlow running for Senate in Louisiana and Amanda McKinney, a congressional candidate in Washington state, both of whom oppose "heavy-handed" AI sector regulation on their campaign websites3

3

. Leading the Future spokesperson Jesse Hunt stated the group seeks champions who can advance a "strong, responsible national regulatory AI framework"1

1

.

Anthropic Takes Opposing Stance on Federal AI Safety Regulations

In a striking contrast, Anthropic has given at least $40 million to Public First Action, a political action committee opposing federal pre-emption laws1

1

. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, who also signed Trump's voluntary AI safety agreement alongside Brockman, has called federal pre-emption of state rules "too blunt"3

3

. Amodei personally committed $1 million to safety-focused political groups backing candidates who want to slow down or regulate AI development4

4

.

This split reveals deep industry tensions over how to balance innovation vs safety. Federal government requirements could hurt industry profits if they slow the release of new models or force companies to change how their products perform to address security concerns3

3

. Both OpenAI and Anthropic are laying groundwork for public offerings expected to rank among the largest ever, with OpenAI racing to close a $30 billion funding round1

1

.

Internal Revolt Forces Brockman to Pull Second Donation

Brockman told OpenAI staff in June he had no plans to give a second pledged $25 million donation to Leading the Future, following an internal revolt at the company1

1

. Jacob Eliosoff, who runs cryptocurrency investment fund Calibrated Markets, said he decided to engage in political donations related to AI after seeing early fundraising from Leading the Future2

2

. "If politicians feel like they can't say anything because there's a very deep-pocketed and ruthless political entity that's going to go after them, that motivates me to step in," Eliosoff explained2

2

.

OpenAI stated the Brockmans' donation was made in a personal capacity, not on behalf of the company3

3

. Brockman's personal spokesperson declined to comment on his political donations1

1

. In a 2025 post on X, Brockman wrote that "being pro-AI does not mean being anti-regulation. It means being thoughtful"3

3

.

AI Industry Influence Tests Democratic Strategy

This election cycle will test whether congressional candidates who take AI industry money and oppose real regulation lose, and whether that is clearly understood as a central factor, according to Guardrails Alliance Executive Director Shaunna Thomas2

2

. Pro-safety donors told Axios they aren't primarily motivated by party affiliation but by fears that AI industry influence will silence candidates on an unpopular technology2

2

.

Leading the Future argues that AI regulation will need 60 votes to pass in the Senate, so anyone serious about AI safeguards should focus on building a broad coalition2

2

. However, Guardrails Alliance faces pushback from some Democrats who warn its strategy of opposing some Democratic candidates could help elect Republicans less inclined to regulate AI2

2

. The group has spent $412,500 against Republican Aaron Flint in a Montana House race4

4

.