2 Sources
[1]
Australia's biggest bank says corporate AI is racking up bigger bills and producing 'work slop'
CBA chief executive Matt Comyn used the phrase 'work slop' to describe the low-quality AI output now flowing through corporate workflows, as token-billed AI costs scale with task complexity. Matt Comyn, chief executive of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, used a speech on Monday to flag two AI-adoption problems large corporate buyers have been working through quietly for several months. The first is that the cost of running generative AI inside corporate workflows is rising substantially faster than most companies budgeted for as task complexity scales. The second is what Comyn called "work slop", the low-quality AI-generated text, code and analysis that flows through internal company systems when employees use AI without sufficient quality control. The cost framing is the part that will resonate with the corporate-IT-buyer audience. Token-based pricing, the per-character billing model the foundation-model labs use to charge enterprise customers, has scaled in the past 18 months from a modest line item into a meaningful operating-expense category. Comyn's point is that the cost compounds faster than expected because token consumption per task rises non-linearly with task complexity: a simple summarisation task might consume 1,000 tokens, but a multi-step reasoning task with tool use can consume 100,000-plus tokens for the same output value. Companies that priced their AI rollouts on the simple-task baseline are now seeing bills that scale on the complex-task curve. This problem is not specific to CBA. Morgan Stanley doubled its European-banking-AI-job-loss forecast last week partly on evidence that AI cost-benefit ratios are tightening at exactly the moment large institutions had hoped they would loosen. The token-cost-scaling problem Comyn described is the underlying mechanic: the same AI deployment that worked at pilot-stage volumes can produce 10-100x the costs at production-stage complexity. The result is the corporate-AI procurement squeeze that Comyn predicted will tighten through 2026: businesses tightening scrutiny of AI-related spending as pressure mounts to demonstrate returns on investment. The "work slop" framing is the more colourful but equally substantive half of the speech. The category Comyn was naming, low-quality AI-generated output that nominally completes a task but actually degrades downstream workflow, is the corporate-knowledge-work analogue of the social-media "AI slop" problem that emerged in 2024 with image-generation tools. The bank version looks like this: an employee uses ChatGPT to draft a customer email, the email is technically grammatical but factually imprecise, the recipient takes the imprecision as a commitment, and the bank deals with the resulting complaint three weeks later at a substantially higher cost than the original work would have generated unaided. The CBA-specific context is significant. The bank announced 90 job cuts earlier this year and a further 120 cuts in May explicitly attributed to AI-driven productivity gains, alongside a A$90m AI-workforce reskilling commitment. Comyn's remarks therefore land inside a CBA strategy that has visibly committed to AI substitution at scale: the "work slop" framing is not a defensive critique of AI from a bank that has rejected the technology but a sharper inside-baseball read on AI deployment from one of Australia's largest current adopters. The wider Australian-bank context is also worth noting. Sam Altman has been arguing over the past month that an AI jobs apocalypse is unlikely at the macro level, and the labour data through March 2026 has so far supported the conservative read. Comyn's remarks complicate that picture: the macro labour data does not yet show large-scale displacement, but the operating-margin data inside large corporates is starting to show the AI-cost-and-quality tradeoffs CBA is now naming explicitly. The substantive implication is that the 2024-2025 AI cost narrative, that token prices were falling so quickly that the deployment-economics question would solve itself, has structurally inverted. Falling per-token prices have been overwhelmed by rising per-task token consumption as enterprises move from pilot deployments to production use cases. The procurement-discipline phase Comyn is forecasting through 2026 is, on this evidence, the predictable consequence.
[2]
Australia's CBA flags surging AI costs as tasks grow complex, slams 'work slop'
Commonwealth Bank of Australia CEO Matt Comyn said businesses globally are likely to tighten scrutiny of artificial intelligence-related spending through 2026 as adoption accelerates and pressure mounts to demonstrate returns on investment. The cost of using AI will rise in less predictable ways as companies deploy the technology for complex tasks, the head of Australia's biggest bank said on Tuesday, calling the expense a key emerging management challenge. Commonwealth Bank of Australia CEO Matt Comyn said businesses globally are likely to tighten scrutiny of artificial intelligence-related spending through 2026 as adoption accelerates and pressure mounts to demonstrate returns on investment. His remarks highlight a growing constraint on AI rollouts in corporate Australia, alongside managing workforce disruption and the heavy energy and water demands of the data centres powering the surge in computing. "I won't be surprised if over the course of this year, companies will be really scrutinising that," Comyn said at an Australian Financial Review conference in Sydney. Unlike most consumers, who use free or fixed-cost AI services, corporate users pay by the amount of text processed, referred to as tokens. In early rollouts of AI in companies, token costs stayed modest because tasks were relatively simple. However, as models have evolved, with more "reasoning, the access to tools, the amount of context that you can put into it - your token costs do not scale on a linear basis," Comyn said. CBA, Australia's second biggest company which writes a quarter of the country's mortgages, has been positioning itself as a keen AI adopter. Last week, it hosted its own AI summit featuring OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and hired what it said was the country's first chief AI scientist at a bank. On Tuesday Comyn said rising AI costs may have one upside - curbing the spread of low-value output, or what he called "work slop." "The scarcity is not around analysis or the preparation of information or PowerPoints or Word docs," he said. "You can be exponentially increasing them if you want to."
Share
Copy Link
Commonwealth Bank of Australia CEO Matt Comyn raised alarm about two critical issues plaguing corporate AI adoption: rapidly escalating costs driven by token-based pricing that scales non-linearly with task complexity, and 'work slop'—low-quality AI-generated content flowing through corporate workflows. The bank, which cut 210 jobs this year citing AI-driven productivity gains, now faces AI bills scaling 10-100x higher than pilot-stage projections.
Matt Comyn, chief executive of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, used a speech on Monday to spotlight two interconnected problems that have been quietly mounting pressure on corporate AI adoption
1
. The first issue centers on AI costs that are rising substantially faster than most companies budgeted for as task complexity scales. The second problem introduces a new term to the corporate lexicon: work slop, describing low-quality AI-generated content that technically completes tasks but degrades downstream workflows1
.
Source: ET
Comyn told attendees at an Australian Financial Review conference in Sydney that businesses globally are likely to tighten scrutiny of AI spending through 2026 as pressure mounts to demonstrate returns on investment
2
. His remarks carry particular weight given CBA's position as Australia's second biggest company, which writes a quarter of the country's mortgages and has positioned itself as a keen adopter of AI technology2
.The cost framing resonates particularly with corporate IT buyers who have watched token-based pricing evolve from a modest line item into a meaningful operating-expense category over the past 18 months
1
. Unlike consumers who use free or fixed-cost AI services, corporate users pay by the amount of text processed, measured in tokens2
.Comyn explained that token costs scale non-linearly with task complexity: a simple summarization task might consume 1,000 tokens, but a multi-step reasoning task with tool use can consume 100,000-plus tokens for the same output value
1
. "As models have evolved, with more reasoning, the access to tools, the amount of context that you can put into it - your token costs do not scale on a linear basis," Comyn said2
.Companies that priced their AI rollouts on simple-task baselines are now seeing bills that scale on the complex-task curve. The same AI deployment that worked at pilot-stage volumes can produce 10-100x the costs at production-stage complexity
1
. This problem extends beyond CBA—Morgan Stanley doubled its European-banking-AI-job-loss forecast last week partly on evidence that AI cost-benefit ratios are tightening at exactly the moment large institutions had hoped they would loosen1
.The work slop phenomenon represents the corporate-knowledge-work equivalent of the social-media "AI slop" problem that emerged in 2024 with image-generation tools
1
. In banking environments, this manifests when an employee uses ChatGPT to draft a customer email that is technically grammatical but factually imprecise. The recipient interprets the imprecision as a commitment, and the bank deals with the resulting complaint three weeks later at a substantially higher cost than the original work would have generated unaided .Comyn suggested that surging AI costs may have one silver lining—curbing the spread of low-value output. "The scarcity is not around analysis or the preparation of information or PowerPoints or Word docs," he said. "You can be exponentially increasing them if you want to"
2
.Related Stories
The context behind Comyn's remarks is significant. CBA announced 90 job cuts earlier this year and a further 120 cuts in May explicitly attributed to AI-driven productivity gains, alongside a A$90m AI-workforce reskilling commitment
1
. The bank recently hosted its own AI summit featuring OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and hired what it described as the country's first chief AI scientist at a bank2
.Comyn's work slop framing is not a defensive critique from a bank rejecting AI technology, but rather a sharper assessment of corporate AI adoption from one of Australia's largest current adopters
1
. His remarks complicate the narrative Sam Altman has been advancing that an AI jobs apocalypse is unlikely at the macro level. While macro labor data through March 2026 has supported the conservative read, operating-margin data inside large corporates is starting to show the AI-cost-and-quality tradeoffs CBA is now naming explicitly1
.The substantive implication is that the 2024-2025 AI cost narrative—that token prices were falling so quickly that deployment economics would solve themselves—has structurally inverted
1
. Falling per-token prices have been overwhelmed by rising per-task token consumption as enterprises move from pilot deployments to production use cases involving complex tasks1
.Comyn's forecast of a procurement-discipline phase tightening through 2026 represents a predictable consequence of this inversion. His remarks highlight growing constraints on AI rollouts in corporate Australia, alongside managing workforce disruption and the heavy energy and water demands of data centers powering the surge in computing
2
. "I won't be surprised if over the course of this year, companies will be really scrutinizing that," Comyn said2
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
28 Nov 2024•Business and Economy

26 May 2026•Business and Economy

29 Jul 2025•Business and Economy

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
