3 Sources
3 Sources
[1]
The least surprising chapter of the Manus story is what's happening right now | TechCrunch
Okay, so the U.S. and China are locked in an all-out race to build the most powerful AI on the planet. Beijing is throwing billions at homegrown models, tightening its grip on the tech sector, and watching nervously as its best AI talent gravitates to U.S. companies. A Carnegie Endowment study published late last year found that 87 of the 100 top Chinese AI researchers at U.S. institutions in 2019 are still there. Yet Manus -- one of China's most buzzed-about AI startups -- quietly relocated to Singapore and sold itself to Meta for $2 billion. Did anyone think there would not be a reckoning over this tie-up? As industry watchers know, Manus burst onto the scene in the spring of last year with a demo video showing an AI agent screening job candidates, planning vacations, and analyzing stock portfolios, and it cheekily claimed it outperformed OpenAI's Deep Research. Within weeks, Benchmark -- the consummate Silicon Valley venture firm -- led a $75 million funding round at a $500 million valuation. That was surprising. (Senator John Cornyn had thoughts, tweeting at the time, "Who thinks it is a good idea for American investors to subsidize our biggest adversary in AI, only to have the CCP use that technology to challenge us economically and militarily? Not me.") By December, Manus had millions of users and was pulling in over $100 million in annual recurring revenue. Then Meta came calling, and Mark Zuckerberg, who has staked the company's future on AI, snapped it up for $2 billion. It's worth noting that Manus didn't just sell itself to an American buyer; it spent the better part of last year actively trying to operate outside China's orbit. The company relocated its headquarters and core team from Beijing to Singapore, restructured its ownership, and after the Meta deal was announced, Meta pledged to cut all ties with Manus's Chinese investors and shut down its operations in China entirely. By every measure, Manus was trying to make itself a Singapore company. But if that string of events raised eyebrows in Washington, you can only imagine that in Beijing, they were apoplectic. China has a phrase for all of this: "selling young crops" -- homegrown AI companies that move abroad and sell themselves to foreign buyers before they've fully matured, taking their intellectual property and talent with them. Beijing hates it and has spent years establishing that no company operates outside its reach. Surely, we all remember that time Jack Ma gave a speech in 2020, mildly criticizing Chinese regulators, after which he disappeared from public life for months, Ant Group's blockbuster IPO was killed overnight, and Alibaba was handed a $2.8 billion fine. China then spent the next two years methodically dismantling its own booming tech sector, wiping out hundreds of billions in market value. Chinese leaders are many things, but subtle is not one of them. Which is why it wasn't entirely surprising when, on Tuesday, the Financial Times reported that Manus co-founders Xiao Hong and Ji Yichao were summoned to a meeting this month with China's National Development and Reform Commission and told that they wouldn't be leaving the country for a while. No formal charges have been filed -- just an inquiry into whether the Meta deal violated Beijing's foreign investment rules. Beijing is calling it a routine regulatory review. At some point, someone at Manus probably thought they'd gotten away with it, and maybe they still will. But given the stakes of the AI race, that was always a big gamble. Now Beijing wants answers; Manus's founders are apparently not going anywhere until it gets them.
[2]
Beijing's surprise intervention on Meta's Manus rattles tech founders, VCs eyeing 'China shedding'
Tech circles from Silicon Valley to Shenzhen buzzed when Meta acquired Manus, a Singaporean AI startup with Chinese roots, for $2 billion late last year. For Chinese founders striving to build products that could rival American peers, the deal felt like a validation that an intricate offshore structure - known as "Singapore washing" where companies relocate to the city state - was the answer to circumvent scrutiny from both Beijing and Washington. Within days, China's surprise intervention on the deal quickly shattered that hope, as Beijing stepped up efforts to discourage Chinese AI founders from moving business offshore. The Chinese government started reviewing whether Manus' sale had violated laws governing technology exports and outbound investment, and barred co-founders Xiao Hong and Ji Yichao from leaving China for Singapore, according to a Financial Times report earlier this week. Founded in China, Manus relocated its headquarters and core teams to Singapore last year, allowing it to access deeper capital pools from foreign investors, including the San Francisco-based venture capital firm Benchmark. The company captivated Silicon Valley with an AI agent capable of building websites and executing basic coding tasks independently. But that investment drew fire in mid-2025 from lawmakers in the U.S. who have prohibited American investors from backing Chinese AI companies directly. The broadening review by the Chinese government fueled concerns and confusion among a generation of Chinese tech founders and venture capitalists that had quietly embraced the so-called "Singapore-washing" model, forcing a reckoning as the U.S.-China tech rivalry deepens.
[3]
China bans Manus founders from leaving country after Meta acquisition
Manus was dubbed as China's next DeepSeek and said its AI agent could buy property, program video games, analyse stocks, and plan travel itineraries. China has blocked the boss of an artificial intelligence startup from leaving the country after the company was acquired by Meta, according to a media report. The chief executive of Manus Xiao Hong and chief scientist Ji Yichao were told they could not leave China while regulators review the acquisition, the Financial Times reported. Meta said in December it would acquire Manus to boost its AI development. Manus catapulted onto the tech sphere when it unveiled what it called the "world's first fully autonomous AI". The company was dubbed as China's next DeepSeek and said its AI agent could buy property, program video games, analyse stocks, and plan travel itineraries. Manus' creator said in a video last year that it is more than "just another chatbot or workflow... It's a completely autonomous agent". Shortly after the acquisition was announced in December, China's commerce ministry said it would investigate whether the deal complied with local laws and regulations. Hong said the move would allow the company to "build on a stronger, more sustainable foundation without changing how Manus works or how decisions are made".
Share
Share
Copy Link
Beijing has barred Manus co-founders Xiao Hong and Ji Yichao from leaving China while reviewing whether Meta's $2 billion acquisition violated foreign investment rules. The intervention signals a crackdown on Chinese AI startups relocating offshore and highlights intensifying tensions in the US-China tech rivalry over AI dominance.
China has blocked Manus co-founders Xiao Hong and Ji Yichao from leaving the country as regulators review whether the Chinese AI startup's $2 billion sale to Meta violated technology export laws and foreign investment rules
1
2
. The Manus founders were summoned this month to a meeting with China's National Development and Reform Commission and told they wouldn't be leaving for Singapore while Beijing conducts what it calls a routine regulatory review1
. No formal charges have been filed, but the commerce ministry announced in December it would investigate whether the deal complied with local laws and regulations3
.
Source: Euronews
Manus burst onto the scene in spring 2025 with a demo video showing an AI agent screening job candidates, planning vacations, and analyzing stock portfolios, claiming it outperformed OpenAI's Deep Research
1
. Within weeks, Benchmark led a $75 million funding round at a $500 million valuation1
. The company relocated its headquarters and core teams from Beijing to Singapore last year, allowing access to deeper capital pools from foreign investors and venture capitalists2
. This offshore structure, known as "Singapore washing," was embraced by tech founders hoping to circumvent scrutiny from both Beijing and Washington2
. By December, Manus had millions of users and was pulling in over $100 million in annual recurring revenue before Mark Zuckerberg snapped it up for $2 billion1
.
Source: TechCrunch
The Meta acquisition reflects deeper tensions in the US-China tech rivalry over AI dominance. A Carnegie Endowment study found that 87 of the 100 top Chinese AI researchers at U.S. institutions in 2019 are still there, highlighting how AI talent gravitates to American companies despite Beijing throwing billions at homegrown models
1
. The investment drew fire from U.S. lawmakers in mid-2025 who have prohibited American investors from backing Chinese AI companies directly2
. Senator John Cornyn tweeted at the time: "Who thinks it is a good idea for American investors to subsidize our biggest adversary in AI, only to have the CCP use that technology to challenge us economically and militarily? Not me."1
Related Stories
Beijing refers to this pattern as "selling young crops" -- homegrown AI companies that move abroad and sell themselves to foreign buyers before they've fully matured, taking their intellectual property and talent with them
1
. Manus restructured its ownership, and after the Meta acquisition was announced, Meta pledged to cut all ties with Manus's Chinese investors and shut down its operations in China entirely1
. The broadening review by the Chinese government fueled concerns and confusion among a generation of Chinese tech founders and venture capitalists that had quietly embraced the offshore model, forcing a reckoning as geopolitical tensions deepen2
. The company was dubbed as China's next DeepSeek and said its AI agent could buy property, program video games, analyze stocks, and plan travel itineraries3
. Xiao Hong said the move would allow the company to "build on a stronger, more sustainable foundation,"3
but Beijing's response demonstrates that outbound investment in AI remains tightly controlled, regardless of corporate restructuring attempts.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
23 Jan 2026•Policy and Regulation

07 Jan 2026•Policy and Regulation

30 Dec 2025•Business and Economy

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
