3 Sources
[1]
AI is not to blame for labor market woes (yet)
Why it matters: Research is piling up that indicates that AI is not the culprit for the current weakness in the labor market. What they're saying: There is a "clear skew for companies using AI to drive productivity and revenue as opposed to cut costs," Joseph Briggs, a senior global economist at
[2]
Goldman Sachs survey says only 11% of companies are actively linking layoffs to AI -- but the real shock is yet to come | Fortune
While the latest wave of AI-linked layoffs has put job seekers -- and even the Federal Reserve -- on high alert, a new survey from Goldman Sachs suggests the real AI labor meltdown is still to come. The report, which surveyed more than 100 Goldman Sachs investment bankers, found that only 11% of
[3]
Goldman Sachs Survey Finds Only 11% Of Companies Cutting Jobs As AI Adoption Rises: Report - Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS)
A survey by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:GS) found that just 11% of clients in the technology, industrial, and finance sectors are actively cutting jobs as a result of AI adoption. The report gathered insights from more than 100 Goldman Sachs investment bankers. AI Drives Productivity
Share
Copy Link
A Goldman Sachs survey of investment bankers reveals that only 11% of companies are currently cutting jobs due to AI, with most firms using the technology to boost productivity rather than reduce costs. However, significant layoffs are projected over the next three years.
A comprehensive survey conducted by Goldman Sachs reveals that artificial intelligence is not yet the primary driver of job losses across major industries, contradicting widespread concerns about immediate AI-driven unemployment. The survey, which gathered insights from more than 100 Goldman Sachs investment bankers across technology, industrial, and finance sectors, found that only 11% of companies are actively cutting jobs as a direct result of AI adoption
1
.
Source: Benzinga
Joseph Briggs, a senior global economist at Goldman Sachs, emphasized that there is a "clear skew for companies using AI to drive productivity and revenue as opposed to cut costs." The data shows that 47% of surveyed companies are leveraging AI to boost productivity and revenue generation, while only about 20% are primarily using the technology for cost reduction purposes
2
.While the overall picture appears relatively benign, the technology sector presents a different narrative. Among tech, media, and communications companies, 31% are actively reducing their workforce due to AI implementation, significantly higher than the cross-industry average
3
.Recent high-profile layoffs underscore this trend. Amazon announced the elimination of 14,000 middle management positions as the company prepares for "a leaner workforce" in an AI-driven future. Other major technology companies, including Salesforce and Accenture, have collectively laid off tens of thousands of workers in recent months, contributing to a concerning trend that has caught the attention of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell
2
.
Source: Fortune
The survey reveals significantly higher AI adoption rates than previously estimated. Goldman Sachs found that 37% of companies are already implementing AI technologies, substantially higher than the Census Bureau's estimate of 10%. The technology and information services industries lead adoption at 63%, with expectations to reach 90% adoption within three years. Financial institutions represent the second-largest adopters, with more than 80% adoption projected over the next three years
1
.Related Stories
While current job losses remain limited, Goldman Sachs analysts predict a significant acceleration in AI-related workforce reductions. Over the next year, bankers anticipate their clients will implement a 4% general headcount reduction. This figure could escalate to 11% over a three-year period, with financial institutions facing the steepest projected cuts at 14%, followed by the technology sector at 10%
2
.Goldman Sachs estimates that over the course of a decade-long AI transition, approximately 6% to 7% of workers could be displaced by the technology. However, economists suggest this represents a "relatively benign labor market outcome" that is unlikely to significantly reduce aggregate demand. The disruption is expected to unfold as a "slow drip" rather than sudden mass displacement
1
.
Source: Axios
Summarized by
Navi
05 Sept 2025•Business and Economy

25 Feb 2026•Business and Economy

19 Aug 2026•Business and Economy

1
Science and Research

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
