2 Sources
2 Sources
[1]
Govt forms high-level inter-ministerial body to steer AI governance strategy
India has established a high-level body, the AI Governance and Economic Group, to lead the nation's AI strategy. Headed by Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, this group will coordinate policies across ministries and regulators. It will also assess AI's impact on the job market and develop mitigation plans. A high-level inter-ministerial body, AI Governance and Economic Group, headed by Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, has been constituted to steer the country's national AI governance strategy, an official statement said on Thursday. AI Governance and Economic Group (AIGEG) will coordinate policy across ministries, departments and sectoral regulators and oversee cross-sectoral governance issues. "The AIGEG will operate as the apex inter-ministerial body within India's AI governance institutional framework. It will be supported by a Technology and Policy Expert Committee (TPEC), which will offer expert advisory to the AIGEG on global developments, emerging technologies, risks, regulation and other evolving priorities relating to AI policy and governance," the statement said. The inter-ministerial body will be chaired by the union electronics and IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw whose portfolio spans railways and Information and Broadcasting. Minister of State for Electronics and IT Jitin Prasada will serve as vice chairperson of AIGEG. The membership brings together senior stakeholders from the government across policy development, science and technology, security and economic affairs.Besides several tasks for AI governance, AIGEG will assess the labour market impacts of AI adoption in advance, and develop mitigation strategies and transition plans that account for informality, skill diversity and regional variations. AIGEG will work with industry and other stakeholders to develop a roadmap for Al deployment over the next decade, including assessment of job profiles affected, geographical concentration ofimpacts. and the extent of automation and augmentation. It will classify AI use cases into categories such as "deploy", "pilot" and "defer" based on readiness in terms of data availability, skills, legal frameworks and capacity for labour adjustment. AIGEG will review existing mechanisms and issue guidelines to ensure that firms are held accountable for compliance with local laws, oversee national initiatives on AI governance across the public and private sector, promote responsible AI innovation and beneficial deployment of AI in key sectors, study the emerging risks of AI, regulatory gaps and the need for legal amendments. The terms of reference of AIGEG also include development and overseeing India's position and strategy on Al governance. "The constitution of the AIGEG gives formal effect to institutional recommendations made in India's AI Governance Guidelines and the Economic Survey," the statement said. India's AI Governance Guidelines recommend the establishment of an inter-ministerial body to steer a whole-of-government approach to AI governance, with a view to aligning the actions of ministries, departments, regulators and advisory bodies around a coherent national strategy. The Economic Survey had mentioned the need for a coordinating authority capable of aligning AI deployment with labour realities and social stability priorities.
[2]
AIGEG: MeitY forms new AI governance body, excludes key regulators
Link to specific chapter related to AI in Economic Survey: Evolution of the AI Ecosystem in India: The Way Forward -- [PDF] and [archive] On April 13, the Indian government formed the new AI Governance and Economic Group (AIGEG) as a "central institutional mechanism" for coordinating AI policy. However, it excludes the independent regulatory bodies proposed in the AI governance guidelines, thereby limiting the group's membership to ministers and senior officials from a few ministries. The PIB press release said the AIGEG was formed after the recommendations from both the India AI Governance Guidelines and the Economic Survey. While the guidelines proposed an AI Governance Group (AIGG) and the survey suggested an AI Economic Council, MeitY merged both into a single body: the AIGEG. The list of regulatory bodies AIGEG excluded despite recommendations in India AI Governance Guidelines is: The following individuals are the members of the group: A Technology and Policy Expert Committee (TPEC) will support AIGEG with advice on "global developments, emerging technologies, risks, regulation, and other evolving priorities relating to AI policy and governance." The government formed this body after repeatedly affirming its stance against regulating AI. For instance, Meanwhile, the recent Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology recommended that the Union government examine the feasibility of a comprehensive law to regulate AI. What did the Indian AI governance guidelines say? "The Committee recommends the creation of an AIGG to develop and oversee India's position and strategy on AI governance. The AI Governance Group should be a small and effective decision-making body with a broad mandate on AI policy and governance in India." India's AI governance guidelines outline the following key functions of the proposed body: What did the Economic Survey say? "The AI Economic Council, separate from the Governance Council, is intended to operate not just with technological imperatives but also with moral imperatives that are sensitive to India's socio-economic realities. It will operate as a coordinating authority responsible for aligning technology deployment with the evolution of India's education and skilling infrastructure while navigating resource constraints and developmental priorities." It laid out the following governance principles:
Share
Share
Copy Link
India has formed the AI Governance and Economic Group (AIGEG), a high-level inter-ministerial body led by Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, to coordinate the nation's AI policy across ministries. The group will assess AI's impact on the job market and develop deployment roadmaps. However, the body excludes independent regulators recommended in earlier AI governance guidelines.
India has constituted the AI Governance and Economic Group (AIGEG), a high-level inter-ministerial body designed to steer the country's national AI governance strategy. Announced on April 13, the AIGEG will serve as the apex body within India's AI governance framework, with Union IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw at its helm
1
. Minister of State for Electronics and IT Jitin Prasada will serve as vice chairperson, bringing together senior stakeholders from across government departments spanning policy development, science and technology, security, and economic affairs1
.
Source: MediaNama
The formation of AIGEG represents MeitY's response to recommendations from both the India AI Governance Guidelines and the Economic Survey, merging the proposed AI Governance Group and AI Economic Council into a single central mechanism for coordinating AI policy
2
. The body will coordinate policy across ministries, departments, and sectoral regulators while overseeing cross-sectoral governance issues1
.A critical mandate for AIGEG involves assessing the impact on the job market from AI adoption and developing comprehensive mitigation strategies. The inter-ministerial body will work with industry and other stakeholders to create a roadmap for AI deployment over the next decade, including detailed assessment of job profiles affected, geographical concentration of impacts, and the extent of automation and augmentation
1
.The group will classify AI use cases into categories such as "deploy," "pilot," and "defer" based on readiness factors including data availability, skills, legal frameworks, and capacity for labour adjustment
1
. This approach accounts for India's unique challenges including informality, skill diversity, and regional variations in the labour market impacts of AI adoption1
.The Technology and Policy Expert Committee (TPEC) will provide advisory support to AIGEG on global developments, emerging technologies, risks, regulation, and other evolving priorities relating to AI policy and governance
1
. This expert committee will help the inter-ministerial body stay informed about global AI governance trends and best practices while tailoring approaches to India's specific context.Related Stories
AIGEG's mandate extends to promoting responsible AI innovation and beneficial deployment of AI in key sectors. The body will review existing compliance mechanisms and issue guidelines to ensure firms are held accountable for compliance with local laws
1
. It will also oversee national initiatives on AI governance across the public and private sector, study emerging risks of AI, identify regulatory gaps, and assess the need for legal amendments1
.Despite its broad mandate, AIGEG excludes several independent regulatory bodies that were recommended in the India AI Governance Guidelines. The body's membership is limited to ministers and senior officials from select ministries, omitting key regulators including the Reserve Bank of India, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, and the Competition Commission of India
2
.This exclusion comes as the government has repeatedly affirmed its stance against regulation of AI, even as the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology recently recommended examining the feasibility of a comprehensive law to regulate AI
2
. The Economic Survey had emphasized the need for a coordinating authority capable of aligning AI deployment with labour realities and social stability priorities1
.The constitution of AIGEG gives formal effect to institutional recommendations, yet its structure suggests a preference for ministerial coordination over independent regulatory oversight. As India positions itself in the global AI governance landscape, stakeholders will be watching how this framework balances innovation with accountability, and whether the absence of independent regulators affects the body's ability to address sector-specific risks and ensure comprehensive oversight of AI adoption across India's diverse economy.
Summarized by
Navi
12 Mar 2025•Policy and Regulation

05 Nov 2025•Policy and Regulation

12 Dec 2024•Policy and Regulation

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
