2 Sources
[1]
Meet the 82-year-old Kentucky grandma who turned down $26 million to turn her farm into a data center: 'I don't need your money' | Fortune
Ida Huddleston has lived on the same stretch of farmland outside Maysville, Kentucky, since she was 16. She and her late husband built a log home there, raised children, and worked the soil through six decades of marriage. Today, the family owns roughly 1,200 acres, and multiple generations still live on it. Last spring, an unnamed company described only as a major artificial intelligence firm came looking for a piece of it, according to WKRC Local 12. The company approached dozens of landowners in Mason County about buying roughly half of the Huddleston family's property for a proposed data center campus. Huddleston, 82, was offered about $60,000 an acre for her 71 acres, over $4 million. Her daughter, Delsia Bare, 54, was offered $48,000 an acre for her 463 acres, putting her potential payout above $22 million. Combined, the family's offer topped $26 million, well above the roughly $6,000-an-acre going rate for farmland in the county. Bare admits she signed a contract to sell, briefly. Fear was part of it, she said, namely worries over what might happen if the company invoked eminent domain and pressure from developers who wouldn't identify themselves. But the deal didn't sit right, and she and her mother pulled out, Bare told People in an exclusive interview. "Money couldn't move what all I've got put in place here," Huddleston told People. "So I just might as well stay and fight it out right where I'm at." Both women have since become vocal opponents of the project, telling local outlets they don't believe the promised jobs and economic growth will materialize. Huddleston calls the offer a scam. She and Bare point to reports of water shortages and groundwater contamination near data centers elsewhere in the country as reasons to keep the land as it is. "You can't get food out of a data center," Huddleston said in the People interview, "and everything coming out of the data center is going to be poison and destructive." Bare, who has never sold, says her attachment to the property runs deeper than money. "The more money you have, the more problems you have," she told People. "It never went through my mind that this was a Cinderella story. I never wanted to leave my land." The project will go on The family's refusal hasn't stopped the project. The company has instead assembled land from other owners who did agree to sell. A zoning request has been filed to rezone nearly 28 agricultural parcels, more than 2,000 acres total, and the local planning commission has since approved the rezoning, according to Local 12. The data center, if built, would sit next to the Huddleston farm rather than on it. County officials have said the project would bring hundreds of full-time jobs and well over a thousand construction jobs. Huddleston isn't persuaded. "I don't want your money, I don't need your money," she told LEX 18. "But I do feel sorry for everybody around us." The Huddlestons' standoff is one thread in a much larger fight playing out across rural America. Michigan township residents voted down an OpenAI-Oracle data center only to watch construction start weeks later; people are sharing their opposition in angry town halls nationwide against data centers, and the fight has become a cross-partisan political issue in Texas as farmers and ranchers push back against Big Tech's search for cheap land and power.
[2]
'They call us old stupid farmers, you know, but we're not': Family declines $26 million offer to convert their farmland into an AI data center
AI companies may have the cash to throw around, but some can't be bought so easily. If one thing is true about AI, it's that there's a lot of money in it. Nvidia became the first $5 trillion company because of its role in the explosion of AI data centers, and OpenAI has been rounding up tens of billions in investments. So you'd think AI companies could buy pretty much whatever they want -- but one farming family in Northern Kentucky showed that's not the case by turning down a $26 million bid. As reported by WKRC-TV Local 12, Ida Huddleston was offered the sum for half of her 1,200-acre farmland this year, which an unnamed company would turn into an AI data center. Huddleston's daughter, Delsia Bare, reportedly said she would "stay and hold and feed a nation" and that "$26 million doesn't mean anything." AI data centers have become an ethical and ideological battleground, with Elon Musk's SpaceXAI only this week agreeing to take down 69 temporary methane turbines in Memphis over the next year in reaction to resident concerns over local disruption. In this case, Bare claims there's history to the site that the data center company would be ignoring. She told Local 12, "My grandfather and great-grandfather and a whole bunch of family have all lived here for years, paid taxes on it, fed a nation off of it." She continues, "[They] even raised wheat through the Depression and kept bread lines up in the United States of America when people didn't have anything else." Bare claims to be among "dozens of landowners" approached by the anonymous buyer, who reportedly represents a major AI company. Notably, Local 12 claims that the land where Bare lives is worth around $6,000 per acre, which makes the offer around ten times the actual value. Huddleston tells Local 12, "They call us old stupid farmers, you know, but we're not. We know whenever our food is disappearing, our lands are disappearing, and we don't have any water -- and that poison. Well, we know we've had it." Huddleston is also sceptical of claims of economic growth as a result of the AI data center. "I say they're a liar, and the truth isn't in them. That's what I say. It's a scam." Data center pushback has been a common theme of the growth of AI, with concerns of both an environmental and ethical nature being front and centre. And AI companies have a lot of money to throw around. Even if you own a lot of land, $26 million must be a life-changing amount of money to anyone but the richest of the rich; it would even be enough to buy some of the RAM that AI data centers have been gleefully sucking up over the last few years. Just a thought.
Share
Copy Link
An 82-year-old Kentucky grandmother and her daughter rejected a $26 million offer from an unnamed AI company seeking to build a data center on their family farmland. Despite offers of up to $60,000 per acre, the Huddlestons chose to preserve their multi-generational farm, citing environmental concerns and skepticism about promised economic benefits.
Ida Huddleston, an 82-year-old grandmother from Mason County, Kentucky, turned down a $26 million offer from an unnamed major AI firm seeking to transform her family's farmland into an AI data center
1
. The company approached dozens of landowners in the area last spring, offering Huddleston approximately $60,000 per acre for her 71 acres, totaling over $4 million. Her daughter, Delsia Bare, 54, received an offer of $48,000 per acre for her 463 acres, exceeding $22 million1
. These offers represented roughly ten times the typical $6,000-per-acre market rate for agricultural land in the county2
.The Huddleston family has maintained deep familial ties to land spanning multiple generations. Ida has lived on the same farmland outside Maysville, Kentucky, since she was 16, building a log home with her late husband and raising children there through six decades of marriage
1
. Today, the family owns roughly 1,200 acres where multiple generations continue to reside. "Money couldn't move what all I've got put in place here," Huddleston told People magazine. "So I just might as well stay and fight it out right where I'm at"1
.Bare emphasized the historical significance of their property, explaining that her grandfather and great-grandfather lived on the land for years, paying taxes and feeding the nation. During the Great Depression, the family raised wheat and maintained bread lines when Americans faced severe food shortages
2
. "$26 million doesn't mean anything," Bare stated, adding that she would "stay and hold and feed a nation"2
.Bare initially signed a contract to sell under pressure from developers who wouldn't identify themselves and fears about potential eminent domain actions. However, the deal didn't sit right, and both she and her mother withdrew from the agreement
1
. "The more money you have, the more problems you have," Bare told People. "It never went through my mind that this was a Cinderella story. I never wanted to leave my land"1
.
Source: Fortune
The Huddlestons have become vocal opponents of the AI data center project, citing environmental and practical concerns. Both women point to reports of water shortages and groundwater contamination near data centers elsewhere in the country as reasons to preserve their farmland
1
. "You can't get food out of a data center," Huddleston said, "and everything coming out of the data center is going to be poison and destructive"1
.Huddleston addressed the aggressive tactics used by AI infrastructure developers, stating: "They call us old stupid farmers, you know, but we're not. We know whenever our food is disappearing, our lands are disappearing, and we don't have any water -- and that poison. Well, we know we've had it"
2
. She remains skeptical about the economic promises of data centers, calling the project "a scam" and dismissing claims of job creation as lies2
.Related Stories

Source: PC Gamer
Despite the family's refusal, the AI data center project continues to move forward. The company assembled land from other owners who agreed to sell, filing a zoning request to rezone nearly 28 agricultural parcels totaling more than 2,000 acres
1
. The local planning commission has approved the rezoning, meaning the data center will be built adjacent to the Huddleston farm rather than on it. County officials claim the project would bring hundreds of full-time jobs and well over a thousand construction jobs, though Huddleston remains unconvinced1
."I don't want your money, I don't need your money," Huddleston told LEX 18. "But I do feel sorry for everybody around us"
1
. Her statement reflects broader ethical concerns about how local communities are affected by rapid AI expansion into rural areas.The Huddlestons' standoff represents one thread in a larger fight playing out across rural America as Big Tech companies search for cheap land and power for AI infrastructure. In Michigan, township residents voted down an OpenAI-Oracle data center, only to watch construction begin weeks later. Angry town halls nationwide have featured people sharing their opposition against data centers, and the issue has become a cross-partisan political concern in Texas as farmers and ranchers push back
1
. These developments suggest that while AI companies possess substantial financial resources to acquire land, not all communities can be easily bought, and resistance to data center development may intensify as more rural areas face similar pressures.Summarized by
Navi
05 Mar 2026•Business and Economy

09 Dec 2025•Policy and Regulation

16 Jul 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Technology
