5 Sources
[1]
Johnson says no moratorium on AI, would give China competitive edge
WASHINGTON, Sept 15 (Reuters) - U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday there cannot be a moratorium on artificial intelligence development without losing the competitive edge to China and that AI companies can regulate themselves. "They can self-regulate. They don't need the government to
[2]
Johnson Says No Moratorium on AI, Would Give China Competitive Edge
WASHINGTON, Sept 15 (Reuters) - U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday there cannot be a moratorium on artificial intelligence development without losing the competitive edge to China and that AI companies can regulate themselves. "They can self-regulate. They don't need the
[3]
Mike Johnson Says AI Can't Slow Down Now Because China Can't Beat U.S.
Mike Johnson Says AI Can't Slow Down Now Because China Can't Beat U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson defended President Donald Trump's claims that the dangers of AI are a "hoax," saying America can't put a "moratorium on the development" of the technology. "[AI companies] don't need the government
[4]
US Speaker Mike Johnson says no moratorium on AI, would give China competitive edge
US House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday there cannot be a moratorium on artificial intelligence development without losing the competitive edge to China and that AI companies can regulate themselves. "They can self-regulate. US House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday there cannot be a
[5]
Johnson says no moratorium on AI, would give China competitive edge
WASHINGTON, Sept 15 (Reuters) - U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson said on Tuesday there cannot be a moratorium on artificial intelligence development without losing the competitive edge to China and that AI companies can regulate themselves. "They can self-regulate. They don't need the government to
Share
Copy Link
House Speaker Mike Johnson declared the US cannot impose an AI moratorium, warning it would surrender America's competitive edge to China and threaten national security. Johnson advocates for AI companies to self-regulate while the White House prepares to convene major AI executives for crucial discussions on balanced guardrails.
House Speaker Mike Johnson firmly rejected calls for an AI moratorium on Tuesday, arguing that halting AI development would hand China a decisive competitive edge with serious national security implications for American families
1
2
. Speaking to reporters, Johnson emphasized that AI companies can self-regulate without government intervention to slow their progress. "They don't need the government to tell them to slow it down. If they want to slow it down, they should," Johnson stated, framing the issue as critical to maintaining US technological superiority3
.
Source: ET
Johnson revealed that he spoke with Donald Trump on Monday night, and they are summoning executives from major AI providers to the White House within the next week for what he described as an important meeting
1
5
. The gathering will include "all the big names that you know" among AI companies, signaling high-level discussions on the future of AI governance in America. This meeting comes as the administration seeks to balance innovation with responsible development, addressing concerns while maintaining the pace of technological advancement.Johnson indicated that AI development will be a central topic when President Donald Trump meets with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington later this month
2
4
. "I'm sure they need to keep tabs and make commitments to one another," Johnson said, though he explicitly rejected the idea of establishing a transnational agency to regulate AI5
. The geopolitical significance of this meeting underscores how US-China relations increasingly revolve around technological competition, with AI serving as a critical battleground for global influence.Related Stories
Johnson defended President Trump's characterization of AI dangers as a "hoax," claiming that panic over AI regulation has been manufactured for political purposes. "They literally said we're all going to be dead in 10 years," Johnson remarked, dismissing such warnings as overblown
3
. He framed Trump's message as reassurance that catastrophic predictions are unfounded, positioning the administration's approach as pragmatic rather than alarmist about AI's potential risks.While opposing an AI moratorium, Johnson acknowledged the need for thoughtful AI regulation and balanced guardrails. He proposed that independent auditors and transparency from AI developers could serve as effective oversight mechanisms without hampering progress
1
5
. "The approach to putting guardrails on AI has to be done in a balanced and thoughtful way," Johnson explained, suggesting that industry self-regulation combined with external auditing could address safety concerns while preserving America's innovation advantage. This stance reflects an attempt to navigate between those calling for strict government oversight and those advocating for minimal interference in AI development, with national security risks from China serving as the decisive factor in rejecting more restrictive measures.Summarized by
Navi
[5]
11 Sept 2026•Policy and Regulation

11 Sept 2026•Policy and Regulation

08 May 2025•Technology

1
Science and Research

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
