32 Sources
[1]
Pentagon inks deals with Nvidia, Microsoft and AWS to deploy AI on classified networks | TechCrunch
"These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the statement reads. The deals come as the U.S. Department of Defense has accelerated its diversification of AI vendors in the wake of its controversial dispute with Anthropic over usage terms of its AI models. The Pentagon wanted unrestricted use of Anthropic's AI tools, but the AI lab insisted on guardrails to prevent Anthropic's tech from being used for domestic mass surveillance and autonomous weapons. The two are fighting it out in court at the moment, though Anthropic in March won an injunction against the Pentagon's move to brand the company a "supply chain risk." "The Department will continue to build an architecture that prevents AI vendor lock-in and ensures long-term flexibility for the Joint Force," the statement reads. "Access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat." The DoD said the companies' AI hardware and models will be deployed on Impact Level 6 (IL6) and Impact Level 7 (IL7) environments to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making." IL6 and IL7 are high-level security classifications for data and information systems that are deemed critical to national security, and require that these systems be protected physically, through strict access controls and audits. The Pentagon said more than 1.3 million DoD personnel have so far used its secure enterprise platform for generative AI, GenAI.mil, which provides access to large language models (LLMs) and other AI tools within government-approved cloud environments. It is designed to help primarily with non-classified tasks like research, document drafting, and data analysis.
[2]
Pentagon strikes classified AI deals with OpenAI, Google, and Nvidia -- but not Anthropic
The Pentagon has struck deals with OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, Elon Musk's xAI, and the startup Reflection, allowing the agency to use their AI tools in classified settings, according to an announcement on Friday. At the same time, the Defense Department has left out Anthropic -- which it previously used for classified information -- after declaring it a supply-chain risk. This builds upon deals with OpenAI and xAI, which have already reached agreements with the Pentagon for the "lawful" use of their AI systems. A report from The Information suggests Google has struck a similar agreement. As noted by The Wall Street Journal, Microsoft and Amazon already have "deep relationships with the Pentagon," while contracts with Nvidia and Reflection are new. And while Anthropic had a $200 million deal to handle classified materials for the Pentagon, it refused to loosen "red lines" around mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons for the agency, leading to a dispute that banned the AI startup's products from the federal government. Anthropic sued the federal government in response and won a temporary injunction. Emil Michael, the Defense Department's chief technology officer, told CNBC on Friday that Anthropic is still a supply chain risk, but called its powerful security model, Mythos, a "separate national security moment," adding that "we have to make sure that our networks are hardened up, because that model has capabilities that are particular to finding cyber vulnerabilities and patching them." In its announcement, the Pentagon says the agreements with the seven AI companies will allow for the "lawful operational use" of their systems, "establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force."
[3]
The Pentagon announces AI deals with OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, and more -- LLMs to be deployed on classified Department of War networks 'for lawful operational use'
American soldiers can now officially use AI as part of their everyday tasks. The U.S. Department of War has announced deals with "seven of the world's leading frontier artificial intelligence companies" for operational use. According to the Classified Networks AI Agreements press release, SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Reflection, Microsoft, and Amazon Web Services will deploy their LLMs across the Pentagon's classified networks "for lawful operational use." The government said that this move will help turn the United States military into "an AI-first fighting force" and will help with "decision superiority across all domains of warfare." It seems that the AI tools that these companies offer will, for now, be limited to data analysis and help make decision-making faster and easier as the U.S. faces complex situations. These tools are accessible via GenAi.mil, the Pentagon's official AI platform, through the Department of War's network and are widely available for its personnel. "Over 1.3 million Department personnel have used the platform, generating tens of millions of prompts and deploying hundreds of thousands of agents in only five months," the Pentagon said. "Warfighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days." Nevertheless, there have been concerns about the use of AI in military applications. Anthropic has famously refused to budge on the Department of War's demand to lower its safeguards, saying that doing so could mean that its AI products could be used for mass surveillance or to create autonomous weapons. This move resulted in President Donald Trump banning the company from federal agencies, even going as far as designating it a supply chain risk for refusing to bow to the federal government's demands. While AI is certainly useful for distilling massive amounts of information and spotting patterns that humans can miss, it's still not a 100% reliable tool for making decisions that could have a global impact. A researcher discovered this when they pitted GPT-5.2, Claude Sonnet 4, and Gemini 3 against each other in a wargame, with 95% of the outcome ending in a tactical nuclear strike. Three scenarios even ended in a strategic nuclear strike that would have ended the world. But even though these AI tools are limited to analysis and support, with a human operator at the helm still responsible for every decision, there's also the risk of automation bias. This is a person's tendency to follow a computer's suggestion despite contradictory information, especially as AI systems can process a ton of data so much more quickly than any human could. However, the data the AI is relying on could be false, erroneous, or misinterpreted, so it's crucial that humans apply their intuition and experience before accepting AI suggestions at face value. The U.S. military isn't the only one experimenting with and deploying AI technologies in operational use. China, for example, has been showing off a 200-strong AI drone swarm that can be controlled by a single soldier, as well as ground-based drone wolfpacks armed with machine guns and grenade launchers for urban combat. While we cannot stop these armed institutions from deploying AI tools for intelligence-gathering, reconnaissance, and decision-making on the battlefield, we can only hope that they do not ignore safeguards and never give AI the triggers to any weapon. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
[4]
Nvidia, Microsoft, AWS Expanding Classified Military AI Use
The Pentagon has struck agreements with four more technology companies for expansive use of advanced artificial intelligence tools on classified military networks, according to a Defense Department statement and two defense officials briefed on the matter. Nvidia Corp., Microsoft Corp., Reflection AI Inc. and Amazon Web Services have all newly struck agreements with the US Defense Department "for lawful operational use," according to the statement. The officials asked not to be named to discuss internal discussions. The companies join a growing roster of technology giants that have recently pledged to provide broader use of AI tools on Pentagon classified networks. Other technology companies that have recently agreed to similar deals include SpaceX, OpenAI and Google. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force," said the statement, which refers to all six companies and which also marks the first official Pentagon confirmation of a new deal with Google reported earlier this week. "For more than a decade, AWS has been committed to supporting our nation's military and ensuring that our warfighters and defense partners have access to the best technology at the best value," according to Tim Barrett, an AWS spokesperson. "We look forward to continuing to support the Department of War's modernization efforts, building AI solutions that help them accomplish their critical missions." A Microsoft spokesperson declined to comment, while representatives from Nvidia and Reflection weren't immediately available for comment. The Pentagon negotiated its deal with Amazon Web Services late into Thursday, according to two Pentagon officials briefed on the talks. The effort to craft a new coalition of technology companies for maximalist military use of advanced AI comes as the Pentagon is racing to develop alternatives to Anthropic PBC's Claude tool. An acrimonious fracture between Anthropic and senior defense officials exposed a recurring fault line between the Pentagon and Silicon Valley over the looming risks of AI at war. The Pentagon refused to heed Anthropic's stated red lines seeking to limit how the US military can use AI in classified operations during recent renegotiations and sought to eject the company from all defense supply lines. The agency gave itself six months to replace Claude, which is being used for US military operations against Iran. The disagreement is now mired in a court battle. On Thursday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth described Anthropic's leader as an "ideological lunatic" and defended his department's use of AI. "We follow the law and humans make decisions," Hegseth told Congress. "AI is not making lethal decisions." Get the Tech Newsletter bundle. Get the Tech Newsletter bundle. Get the Tech Newsletter bundle. Bloomberg's subscriber-only tech newsletters, and full access to all the articles they feature. Bloomberg's subscriber-only tech newsletters, and full access to all the articles they feature. Bloomberg's subscriber-only tech newsletters, and full access to all the articles they feature. Plus Signed UpPlus Sign UpPlus Sign Up By continuing, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Since the fallout with Anthropic, the Pentagon has accelerated its efforts to bring on other AI companies to agree to expanded usage terms for their models and infrastructure on secret and top-secret networks. In addition, defense officials are seeking to ensure the US military avoids depending on any one single company or set of limitations, according to one of the Pentagon officials briefed on the talks. The Pentagon's effort to equip the US military with cutting-edge AI at the classified level will help "human-machine teams" that can handle immense volumes of data, said Cameron Stanley, the Pentagon's chief digital and AI officer, in a statement referring to the new deals. Although OpenAI signed a new agreement for expanded use of its models on classified networks with the Pentagon earlier this year, its tools are still not deployed on classified defense networks, according to an OpenAI spokesperson, who added that implementation is nevertheless underway. Several campaign groups have highlighted the risks of relying on unpredictable AI-assisted systems in support of life-and-death decisions. AI systems can be prone to error and can lead to automation bias, or a tendency to trust machine outputs over human reasoning, the critics have argued. Stanley didn't specify the precise ways in which the Pentagon intends to use AI models in classified operations. He described them as digital tools that would make it easier for the Pentagon to crunch through data, increase understanding in complex environments and make "better decisions, faster." Claude is among the AI tools used on Maven Smart System, a digital platform used in support of targeting and battlefield operations during Iran operations. US Central Command has said it is using a variety of AI tools to speed processes.
[5]
Pentagon reaches agreements with leading AI companies
WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Friday it had reached agreements with seven leading AI companies to deploy their advanced capabilities on the Defense Department's classified networks. SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services will be integrated into the Pentagon's Impact Levels 6 and 7 network environments to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Pentagon said in a statement. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare". Another AI giant Anthropic has been in dispute with the Pentagon over guardrails for how the military could use its artificial intelligence tools, which led the Pentagon to label Anthropic a supply-chain risk last month, barring its use by the Pentagon and its contractors. The tech news site the Information reported on Tuesday that Google had joined a growing list of firms to sign a deal enabling the Department of Defense to use its artificial intelligence models for classified work. The agreement allows the Pentagon to use Google's AI for "any lawful government purpose," the report added, putting it alongside OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI, which also have deals to supply AI models for classified use. Reporting by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Kevin Liffey Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab
[6]
Pentagon signs new military AI deals with Nvidia, Microsoft and Amazon
The Pentagon has struck new agreements with tech companies to use their AI tools and infrastructure on classified networks, as the US military broadens its AI options after its relationship with Anthropic collapsed. The defence department said on Friday it has reached deals with Nvidia, Microsoft, Reflection AI and Amazon Web Services for the "lawful operational use" of their technology. The deals are similar to those previously struck with SpaceX, OpenAI and Google. The deals come amid a clash between the Pentagon and Anthropic. Its Claude model was previously the only one used in classified settings, including in the war against Iran and the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. But Dario Amodei, Anthropic's chief executive, has said he refused to sign a deal with the defence department unless the government guaranteed that Anthropic's tools would not be used for mass domestic surveillance and lethal autonomous weapons. The seven agreements signed by the Pentagon provide access to proprietary and closed models via SpaceX, OpenAI and Google, and open source models with Nvidia and Reflection AI. Microsoft and AWS are providing AI infrastructure. Emil Michael, the Pentagon's chief technology officer, told CNBC on Friday that "open source is a brand new vector for us, which is very important because Chinese open source models have infiltrated a lot of different companies. We want to have an American alternative to that." On Monday, Google signed its Pentagon deal as more than 560 employees sent an open letter to chief executive Sundar Pichai urging him to walk away from talks because of concerns that its technology could be used in "inhumane or extremely harmful ways". Accelerating the incorporation of AI throughout the military -- including on the battlefield -- has been a priority for the Pentagon under US defence secretary Pete Hegseth. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the Pentagon said. The US attempt to designate Anthropic as a supply chain risk in late February -- just one day before the start of the US war on Iran -- was an unprecedented move by the Pentagon against an American company. "Anthropic is run by an ideological lunatic" who should not have "decision-making over what we do", Hegseth told Congress on Thursday. US President Donald Trump also banned Anthropic from all government contracts, while Anthropic and the Pentagon are locked in legal battles. However, Amodei met White House chief of staff Susie Wiles last month, as the US government sought access to Anthropic's new Mythos model, which has shown strong advances in breaking cyber defences. Michael said on Friday that "the Mythos issue . . . is a separate national security moment where we have to make sure that our networks are hardened up, because that model has capabilities that are particular to finding cyber vulnerabilities and patching them".
[7]
Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and NVIDIA will provide AI tech to Pentagon - Engadget
You can add Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and NVIDIA to the growing list of tech giants that have decided to give the US Defense Department access to their AI tools. According to Bloomberg, the three companies -- alongside a forth, Reflection AI -- have signed agreements granting the Pentagon use of their AI technologies "for lawful operational use" on classified military networks. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force," the Pentagon said in a statement shared with Bloomberg. The four companies join xAI, OpenAI and Google in signing similar deals with the Defense Department. That essentially leaves Anthropic as the lone major US-based AI provider without a working agreement with the Pentagon. In February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to label Anthropic a "supply chain risk" if it did not agree to withdraw safeguards preventing the company's chatbot, Claude, from being used for mass surveillance against Americans or deployed in fully autonomous weapons. After Anthropic refused to bow to Hegseth's demands, President Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Claude and other Anthropic products within six months. As things stand, the two sides are embroiled in an ongoing court battle. The Defense Department's rapid adoption of AI tech, and the speed at which American tech companies are lining up to sell their wares to the Trump administration, should be a concern for all US citizens. If there's some small comfort, however, it's that it appears most people don't approve of the deals AI companies are striking with the Pentagon. According to data from market intelligence firm Sensor Tower, OpenAI saw uninstalls of ChatGPT jump by 413 percent year-over-year in February after the company inked its deal with the Defense Department.
[8]
US military reaches deals with 7 tech companies to use their AI on classified systems
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Pentagon said Friday that it has partnered with seven tech companies to tap into their artificial intelligence in classified systems, allowing the military to boost its use of AI to help it fight wars. Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, Nvidia, OpenAI, Reflection and SpaceX will provide resources to help "augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Defense Department said. The Defense Department has been rapidly accelerating its use of AI in recent years. The technology can help the U.S. military reduce the time it takes to identify and strike targets on the battlefield, while aiding in the organization of weapons maintenance and supply lines, according to a report in March from the Brennan Center for Justice. Friday's announcement comes after concerns raised by a company not on the list, Anthropic, whose battle with the Pentagon to put up AI guardrails has spilled into court. The tech company said it wanted assurances in its contract that the military would not use its technology in fully autonomous weapons and the surveillance of Americans. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the company must allow for any uses the Pentagon deemed lawful. Anthropic sued after President Donald Trump, a Republican, tried to stop all federal agencies from using the company's chatbot Claude and Hegseth sought to label the company a supply chain risk, a designation meant to protect against sabotage of national security systems by foreign adversaries. OpenAI had announced a deal with the Pentagon in March to effectively replace Anthropic with ChatGPT in classified environments. The Pentagon said Friday that military personnel are already using its AI capabilities through its official platform, GenAI.mil. "Warfighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days," the Pentagon said, adding that the military's growing AI capabilities will "give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat." ___
[9]
The Pentagon just signed AI deals with OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia - and cut Anthropic out entirely
Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. What just happened? The Pentagon has finalized a sweeping set of AI agreements with some of the industry's biggest names, opening classified military environments to models and infrastructure from OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, Nvidia, SpaceX, and newcomer Reflection AI. The deals mark a significant expansion of how artificial intelligence is used inside the Defense Department, consolidating access that had previously been scattered or subject to tighter restrictions. Defense officials have framed the effort as a necessary step to keep pace with both technological change and geopolitical competition. "We are equipping the warfighter with a suite of AI tools to maintain an unfair advantage and achieve absolute decision superiority," Emil Michael, the undersecretary of defense for research and engineering, told the Wall Street Journal. Several companies in the group, including OpenAI and SpaceX, had already signed preliminary agreements with the military. The new contracts allow those relationships to expand into daily operations covering analysis, logistics, and large-scale data processing. The vendor mix reflects the extent to which AI development is tied to cloud infrastructure. Microsoft, Amazon, and Oracle are not only building models but also providing the underlying compute environments where those models run. That combination allows the Pentagon to deploy AI systems within existing secure cloud frameworks, rather than building new infrastructure from scratch. At the same time, the inclusion of Nvidia and Reflection AI signals a push toward open-source models. Nvidia's agreement centers on its Nemotron models, which are designed to support autonomous agents capable of carrying out multi-step tasks. Because these models are open, their internal architecture can be inspected and modified, which is useful for tailoring systems to specific defense use cases. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that this transparency can be an advantage in national security settings. "Safety and security is frankly enhanced with open-source," he said in a recent conversation with the Special Competitive Studies Project. That view carries geopolitical weight. Chinese firms have aggressively distributed open AI models internationally, and US officials increasingly see domestic open-source development as a strategic imperative. Reflection AI, a newer company backed by Nvidia, fits into that effort. Founded by former Google DeepMind researchers, the startup is working on open-source systems and has been involved in a government-supported initiative to develop models tailored for the South Korean market. The company has not yet released a model but is reportedly seeking funding at a $25 billion valuation. "This shared understanding with the Pentagon is a first step in supporting US national security, and sets a precedent for how AI labs could work across the US government - from supporting our servicemembers to our scientists," a Reflection spokeswoman said. The Pentagon's expanded roster of AI providers follows a breakdown in its relationship with Anthropic. The company's Claude models had been among the few available in classified settings, largely through Palantir's Maven platform. After a contract dispute, the Defense Department labeled Anthropic a supply-chain risk, effectively cutting off its systems and accelerating efforts to bring in other vendors. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, speaking during congressional testimony, called Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei an "ideological lunatic." Anthropic is now challenging that designation in court. Its models had previously been used in military contexts, including during the Iran conflict and in an operation targeting Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro earlier this year. But not everything is on the table. Several companies involved in the agreements have said their technologies will not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous weapons. The Defense Department has said those uses would be illegal and has urged companies to trust its oversight. What is changing, though, is the role AI plays inside the military. With access to a broader range of models and the infrastructure to run them securely, the Pentagon is moving beyond experimentation.
[10]
Pentagon says US military will be an 'AI-first' fighting force
The US military plans to increase its use of artificial intelligence (AI) further after the Pentagon agreed to new and expanded contracts with some of the biggest names in technology. Under eight agreements with Google, OpenAI, Amazon, Microsoft, SpaceX, Oracle, Nvidia and the start-up Reflection, the Pentagon said AI technology would now be used for any "lawful operational use". "These agreements accelerate the transformation [of] the US military as an AI-first fighting force," the Pentagon said. Conspicuous by its absence is Anthropic, as the company has said it is concerned about how the Pentagon could use its tools in warfare and domestically. The firm is now suing the government over the alleged retaliation it faced after refusing to accept "any lawful use" language in its own contract. The Pentagon on Friday noted that partnering with so many companies on AI would help it avoid "vendor lock" or being too reliant on a single company for its technology. "Access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat," the Pentagon said. It noted that more than a million people across the defence department had used the military's AI platform which hosts the tools since it was launched last year, helping them cut the time it took for many tasks "from months to days". Access to powerful technology has become a key component of success in warfare and the Pentagon has been working to build up its AI capabilities for several years. Anthropic's tools, including a version of its Claude chatbot, are still currently in use in many US government and defence agencies, as it was the first AI company to be deployed for classified work. But earlier this year the relationship broke down as Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei went public with fears that powerful AI tools could be used by defence agencies to conduct mass domestic surveillance and to deploy fully autonomous weapons of war. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth moved within days to label Anthropic a "supply chain risk" meaning it was deemed too dangerous for use in government settings. Anthropic's legal challenge to that ruling is expected to go to court in September. In the meantime the row appears to have opened the door for other AI companies to work more closely with the government and military. OpenAI was the first company to ink a new deal with the Pentagon in the wake of Anthropic's row. The ChatGPT-maker signed a contract at the end of February. A company spokeswoman said that Friday's announcement from the defence department was simply a formalisation of that deal. "As we said when we first announced our agreement several months ago, we believe the people defending the United States should have the best tools in the world," the OpenAI spokeswoman said. While Google's Gemini was also already in use by some parts of the government, this will be the first time the chatbot is being used to handle any government work at a classified level. Earlier this week, hundreds of Google employees, including many from DeepMind, a part of the company that does much of the development work behind its AI models and tools, urged the company not to deepen its work with the government in a letter sent to chief executive Sundar Pichai and viewed by the BBC. A Google spokesperson did not reply to a request for comment. As for SpaceX, it is now the parent company of xAI, the AI startup Elon Musk formed after he acquired Twitter. The company operates the controversial AI chatbot Grok, but is widely considered to offer less advanced AI capabilities than the likes of Anthropic, OpenAI and Google. A representative of SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment. Nvidia and the startup Reflection will both have their open-source AI models, Nemotron and Reflection 70B, respectively, in use by the government. Nvidia is not providing any hardware as part of the deal. Neither company responded to a request for comment. Microsoft, AWS and Oracle have for years provided the cloud services purpose-built to enable government work that happens online. The companies did not reply to a request for comment. Friday's announcement from the Pentagon marked a continuation of those services, which will now be used to deploy more AI models and tools than ever for military use.
[11]
Pentagon Makes Deals With A.I. Companies to Expand Classified Work
Julian Barnes and Sheera Frenkel have been reporting on the Pentagon's work, and disputes, with artificial intelligence companies. The Pentagon announced on Friday that it had reached deals with some of the technology industry's biggest companies in an effort to expand the military's artificial intelligence capabilities and increase the number of firms authorized to be on classified networks. The companies, according to the Defense Department, agreed to allow the Pentagon to employ their technology for "any lawful use," a standard resisted by Anthropic, which was initially the only artificial intelligence model available on classified markets. The Pentagon had previously confirmed deals with Elon Musk's xAI, OpenAI and Google. In addition the Pentagon said it had reached deals with Amazon Web Services, Microsoft, Nvidia and Reflection AI, a start-up. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an A.I.-first fighting force," the Pentagon said in a statement. Defense Department officials hope the new deals will push Anthropic to drop its reservations about the military's broad "any lawful use" standard. President Trump has ordered the government to cut ties with Anthropic, but for now the company's technology remains on classified networks and intelligence analysts still depend on the firm's models. While the Pentagon wants to quickly move to OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini, there have been growing pains and technical problems. Anthropic and the Pentagon are currently in federal litigation over the Defense Department's decision to label the company a supply chain risk, a novel use of the government's power to raise concerns about how corporations build their products. White House officials, impressed and worried about the power of Anthropic's newest model, Mythos, have been pushing for a compromise that would end the company's feud with the Pentagon, or at least allow other parts of the government to work with the firm. The deal with the companies was reported earlier by Bloomberg. A Pentagon official said the new agreements would help prevent "vendor lock" and ensure that the military would not have to depend on any one company. The military also wants firms to agree to a single standard, and has been loath to give firms contractual guarantees about how their models will be used. Anthropic and the Pentagon have been locked in a debate over whether the company's Claude model could be used to pilot autonomous drones or work on domestic surveillance. The Pentagon says it does not intend to use the model for either of those activities, but the two sides have not agreed on contractual language, or if it is even necessary. In its announcement, the Pentagon did not specify how it would use the new A.I. tools but said the agreement would help service members make faster and better decisions. "Access to a diverse suite of A.I. capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give war fighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat," the Pentagon said.
[12]
Microsoft and Amazon join Pentagon's push to build AI-first military with classified network deals
Microsoft and Amazon joined other leading artificial intelligence companies in signing deals to deploy their technology in classified Pentagon networks, the Defense Department announced Friday, accelerating a push to build what the military is calling an "AI-first fighting force." The agreements -- which also include OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, SpaceX and the startup Reflection -- will give those firms' AI systems access to the military's most classified network environments, known as Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7. The Pentagon said the technology will be used to analyze data and improve battlefield decision-making. "Together, the War Department and these strategic partners share the conviction that American leadership in AI is indispensable to national security," the Pentagon said in a statement, using the Trump administration's preferred name for the Defense Department. The Pentagon says the effort is already well underway. More than 1.3 million Defense Department personnel have used GenAI.mil, the military's official AI platform, generating tens of millions of prompts and deploying hundreds of thousands of agents in just five months, according to the department. Officials say the technology has cut some tasks from months to days. The deals come as the Pentagon is locked in a legal battle with Anthropic, one of the nation's leading AI labs, which had sought guarantees its technology would not be used for mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. The Defense Department moved to blacklist Anthropic earlier this year, calling the company a national security risk -- a designation Anthropic is contesting in court. On Thursday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei an "ideological lunatic" and slammed the company during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. Bloomberg reported that the Pentagon negotiated its deal with Amazon Web Services late into Thursday night, according to two officials briefed on the talks. "We look forward to continuing to support the Department of War's modernization efforts, building AI solutions that help them accomplish their critical missions," AWS spokesman Tim Barrett said in a statement. Hundreds of Google employees sent a letter to company leadership this week urging them to refuse to let the Pentagon use its AI on classified data. "We want to see AI benefit humanity; not to see it being used in inhumane or extremely harmful ways," they wrote, according to The Washington Post.
[13]
Pentagon signs classified AI deals with Nvidia, Microsoft, and AWS after ejecting Anthropic over safety limits
The Pentagon announced on 1 May that it has signed agreements with Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, and Reflection AI for expanded use of advanced artificial intelligence on classified military networks. The deals bring the total number of companies with such agreements to seven, following similar arrangements with SpaceX, OpenAI, and Google, which signed its own classified AI deal earlier this week. All seven agreements permit "lawful operational use," a phrase that the Defense Department statement describes as enabling the transformation "toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force." The phrase is not accidental. It is a deliberate replacement for the restrictions that Anthropic, the company behind Claude, attempted to impose on military use of its technology. Anthropic's refusal to remove those restrictions led to its ejection from the Pentagon's supply chain. The seven companies that remain have agreed to terms that Anthropic would not. The distinction matters because it defines what "classified military AI" means in practice. Anthropic's position, before the Pentagon designated it a supply chain risk in February, was that it would not permit its models to be used for mass domestic surveillance of American citizens or for fully autonomous weapons systems. These were not vague principles. They were contractual red lines that Anthropic insisted on including in its Pentagon agreement, which was worth $200 million and had been awarded in July 2025. The Pentagon refused to accept the restrictions during renegotiations in late 2025 and early 2026, and when Anthropic held firm, the Defense Department moved to eject the company entirely and replace it with competitors willing to sign broader terms. "Lawful operational use" is the result: a formulation expansive enough to cover targeting assistance, intelligence synthesis, and operational planning on secret and top-secret networks, without the specific prohibitions Anthropic sought. The new agreements give the Pentagon "wide leeway to potentially use powerful advanced AI technologies for secret combat operations, including to assist with targeting," according to defence officials briefed on the matter. The Pentagon negotiated its deal with AWS late into Thursday evening, suggesting urgency in assembling the full set of agreements. An AWS spokesperson, asked to comment on the deal, referred to the Defense Department as "the Department of War," its pre-1947 name, and said AWS "looks forward to continuing to support" its modernisation efforts. The seven companies now operating on classified Pentagon networks represent the near-entirety of the American AI industry's infrastructure layer. Nvidia provides the chips. Microsoft and AWS provide the cloud infrastructure. Google provides Gemini. OpenAI provides GPT. SpaceX provides satellite communications and, following its acquisition of xAI, AI models trained on data from X. Smaller defence-focused AI firms are also building for sovereign military applications, but the Pentagon's priority is clearly the largest providers. Reflection AI, a less well-known company among the seven, builds AI specifically for classified and intelligence community applications. The breadth of the arrangement is the point. Defence officials have said they are seeking to ensure the US military "avoids depending on any one single company or set of limitations," a formulation that is itself a reference to the Anthropic fallout. The Pentagon does not want to be in a position where a single AI company's ethical red lines can constrain military operations. The solution is diversification across seven providers, all of whom have agreed to terms that do not include the restrictions Anthropic insisted upon. The "AI-first fighting force" that the Pentagon envisions requires AI that is available for any lawful purpose the military defines, without prior constraints imposed by the companies that build it. The Anthropic story runs in the opposite direction. The company was designated a supply chain risk, a label previously reserved for Chinese companies such as Huawei and ZTE. Its $200 million Pentagon contract was effectively voided. Senior defence officials publicly criticised the company, and the Trump administration has since expanded the dispute to include opposition to Anthropic's Mythos model and restrictions on its deployment in government systems. The commercial consequences, so far, have been negligible. Anthropic's valuation has risen to approximately $900 billion, up from $380 billion in February. Its largest compute deal, with Google and Broadcom, dwarfs the Pentagon contract it lost. The company's revenue run rate is approximately $30 billion. Being ejected from the Pentagon's classified networks has not, at least in the short term, damaged Anthropic's business. What it has done is establish a precedent. Any AI company that sets specific limits on military use of its technology will be replaced by one that does not. The Pentagon's message, delivered through seven simultaneous agreements with competitors, is that the Department of Defense will not negotiate the scope of military AI use with the companies that build it. "Lawful operational use" means the military decides what is lawful and what is operational. The companies provide the technology. The question of whether AI should assist with targeting, or whether fully autonomous systems should make lethal decisions, is not one the Pentagon intends to resolve through commercial contracts. It is one the Pentagon intends to resolve by selecting vendors who do not ask it. The practical implications are significant. AI deployed on Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7 classified networks will be used for intelligence analysis, operational planning, and the synthesis of data from sources that are themselves classified. The Pentagon's statement says these tools will "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments." In less bureaucratic language: AI will help analysts process intelligence faster, help commanders understand battlefields in closer to real time, and help targeting teams identify and prioritise objectives. SpaceX's expanding AI capabilities, acquired through its merger with xAI, add a dimension that did not exist when the Pentagon first began negotiating these deals: a satellite communications company that also builds AI models, operating on the same classified networks that process targeting data. The speed of the Pentagon's pivot is itself a statement. Five months ago, Anthropic held a $200 million contract and was the most prominent AI company working on classified military systems. Today, seven competitors have signed agreements that collectively render Anthropic's military contribution replaceable. The Pentagon has answered a question that the AI industry has been debating since the first Google employee protested Project Maven in 2018: whether the companies that build the most powerful AI systems will have a say in how those systems are used by the military. The answer, delivered across seven contracts in a single week, is no.
[14]
The Rest of Big Tech Piles in to Take the Pentagon Deal That Anthropic Wouldn't
Four new companies have agreed to let the U.S. military use their AI tech for classified work. While Anthropic took a stand earlier this year to limit how its AI tech is used in classified military settings, it seems like the rest of Silicon Valley isn’t too concerned. Four more tech companies have struck deals with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to deploy their advanced AI capabilities on classified military networks for “lawful operational use.†Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon Web Services, and startup Reflection AI were named as the latest companies to sign agreements with the Pentagon, according to a DoD press release. They join SpaceX, OpenAI, and Google, bringing the total number of AI companies participating in classified military work to seven. “These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare,†the press release reads. The press release added that integrating advanced AI systems into classified networks will “streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments.†“For more than a decade, AWS has been committed to supporting our nation's military and ensuring that our warfighters and defense partners have access to the best technology at the best value,†AWS Spokesperson Tim Barrett told Gizmodo in an emailed statement. "We look forward to continuing to support the Department of War's modernization efforts, building AI solutions that help them accomplish their critical missions." Microsoft, Nvidia, and Reflection AI did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Gizmodo. The deals come as concerns grow around the use of AI for surveillance and military applications. Earlier this year, Anthropic, which at the time was the only major AI company working with the Pentagon on classified systems, reportedly hit a wall in negotiations with the DoD after officials pushed for language allowing Anthropic's technology to be used for “any lawful purpose.†The biggest sticking points involved potential uses tied to domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons systems. In both situations, there are arguments that AI could already be legally used for those purposes. There's also the fact that laws and courts' interpretations of those laws change all the time, and the U.S. has very little legislation that was written with AI in mind. After those talks reportedly fell apart, the Trump administration designated the company as a supply chain risk. Anthropic later filed two lawsuits against the Defense Department in response. Since then, however, President Donald Trump has said his administration has had “some very good talks†with Anthropic and suggested a future agreement restoring the company’s access to Pentagon work could still be “possible.†Anthropic’s most advanced AI model, Mythos, has further complicated matters. The model, which has only been released to a select number of organizations, is reportedly already being tested by the National Security Agency (NSA) to help identify cybersecurity vulnerabilities in widely used software, including Microsoft products. Still, just yesterday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Anthropic was being run by an “ideological lunatic who shouldn’t have sole decision-making over what we do†during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing. When asked if “there will always be a human in the loop," Hegseth avoided giving a direct answer and stuck with “We follow the law and humans make decisions.†He added that AI is not currently "making lethal decisions.†The controversy has left some tech companies trying to straddle the fence. Google struck its agreement earlier this week despite more than 600 employees, including directors and vice presidents, signing a letter that urged CEO Sundar Pichai to refuse to allow Google’s AI models to be used in classified military settings. Meanwhile, in the blog post announcing its deal, OpenAI said it maintained control over its “safety stack†and prohibited the use of its AI for mass domestic surveillance or directing lethal autonomous weapons systems. The Information reports that Google’s agreement includes similar language, but also states that the company “does not confer any right to control or veto lawful Government operational decision-making.â€
[15]
Pentagon taps NVIDIA, Google, OpenAI to deploy AI on new top-secret military networks
The Defense Department confirmed agreements with Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, and Reflection AI. These deals follow earlier arrangements with Google, SpaceX, OpenAI, and Oracle. The Pentagon said it will deploy AI models and hardware across highly secure systems. These include Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7 environments, which handle sensitive national security data. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the statement reads. Officials say the goal is to improve battlefield awareness and speed up decisions. The systems will support data synthesis, intelligence analysis, and operational planning in complex environments. The Pentagon emphasized that all deployments will meet strict security requirements. IL6 and IL7 systems require tight physical controls, restricted access, and continuous audits. By integrating frontier AI tools into these environments, the department aims to enhance situational awareness. It also wants to reduce the time needed to process large volumes of data.
[16]
Top AI companies agree to work with Pentagon on secret data
The Pentagon said it signed a deal with companies including Amazon, Google and Microsoft. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post) Seven leading artificial intelligence companies have reached deals to deploy their technology in classified Pentagon computer networks, the Defense Department said Friday. "Together, the War Department and these strategic partners share the conviction that American leadership in AI is indispensable to national security," the Pentagon said in a statement, using the administration's preferred name for the Defense Department.
[17]
7 of the biggest names in AI, including OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, are now moving into military systems -- but one major player is missing from the list, and that raises uncomfortable questions about where this technology is heading
* The Pentagon signs major AI deals to deploy military AI systems * New AI tools approved for classified military use under "lawful use" rules * Anthropic refuses Pentagon AI deal over surveillance and autonomous weapons concerns The U.S. Department of Defense has signed up most of the most powerful AI model developers to bring their systems directly into military operations. OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, Nvidia, SpaceX, and Reflection AI will all help the Pentagon speed up the transition toward what it calls an "AI-first fighting force." The idea is to make AI-powered tools to process information faster and to suggest decisions in complex environments. The companies involved have agreed that their tools can be used for "any lawful use," a very broad standard, too broad, it seems, for Anthropic. Conspicuous in its absence, the Claude developer has been fighting with the DoD over how its AI can be used for months. Central to Anthropic's concerns is how its AI might be deployed for domestic surveillance and fully autonomous lethal systems. Perhaps the company has seen how AI models seem comfortable with nuclear threats in war games. The government responded by branding Anthropic a supply-chain risk to block it from defense contracts. Anthropic has challenged that decision. From lab to battlefield The other companies are choosing to engage fully with government contracts, accepting broad terms in exchange for access and influence despite pushback and skepticism from consumers, and some of the leadership of the companies themselves. There are practical implications for how AI evolves in military contexts as a result of the deal. By moving forward with multiple partners, the Pentagon reduces its reliance on any single company. Without Anthropic, however, there can't be any claim to industry-wide unity. Defense officials appear to believe that excluding Anthropic could put pressure on them to return to negotiations, especially as rival firms deepen their involvement. Whether that approach succeeds remains to be seen. Still, the DoD is investing heavily in AI, with tens of billions of dollars earmarked for programs. The partnerships with private companies make technical sense, as they have the most advanced AI models. Strengths and abilities The companies themselves bring different strengths and abilities, incorporating everything from chips to software to deployment. AI is becoming embedded in the infrastructure of modern warfare at a pace reflecting both competitive pressure and the belief that these systems can deliver a decisive advantage. What remains less clear is how the boundaries will be defined as the technology matures. Questions about oversight, accountability, and unintended consequences are still being worked out, even as deployment accelerates. Anthropic holding out doesn't mean the integration won't happen, but it does make the underlying tensions harder to ignore. Even as AI becomes central to national security, there are still unresolved debates about how far it should go and who gets to decide. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds.
[18]
Pentagon plans to make US military 'AI-first fighting force' by pairing with companies
Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox The Pentagon said on Friday it had reached agreements with seven leading artificial intelligence (AI) companies: SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Reflection, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the Pentagon said in statement. The US Department of Defense is budgeting tens of billions of dollars for numerous technology firms' cutting edge programs related to intelligence, drone warfare, classified and unclassified information networks and much more. The plans have sparked disputes with some AI firms and controversy and concerns over public spending, global cyber security and the capacity for such technology to be used for domestic surveillance. In January Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, unveiled a new "AI acceleration strategy" at the Pentagon that he said will "unleash experimentation, eliminate bureaucratic barriers, focus on investments, and demonstrate the execution approach needed to ensure we lead in military AI and that it grows more dominant into the future". On Friday, the department announced that the companies mentioned will be integrated into what it called the Pentagon's "Impact Levels 6 and 7" network environments to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments", according to a federal statement. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the Pentagon's statement added. Another AI giant, Anthropic, has been in dispute with the Pentagon over guardrails for how the military could use its artificial intelligence tools, which led the Pentagon to label Anthropic a supply-chain risk last month, barring its use by the Pentagon and its contractors.
[19]
Pentagon Signs AI Deals With Google, OpenAI, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon and SpaceX - Decrypt
The Pentagon's internal AI platform shows rapid early adoption across the department. The U.S. Department of Defense said Friday it has entered agreements with eight technology firms, certifying SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, Nvidia, Reflection, Microsoft, Oracle, and Amazon Web Services to deploy advanced artificial intelligence on classified military networks. According to the announcement, the systems will run at Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7, Department of Defense security standards for classified data, with IL6 covering secret-level information and IL7 used for more sensitive intelligence systems designed to handle highly restricted national security data. The AI must operate on tightly controlled infrastructure with strict access controls, network isolation, and clearance requirements. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the Pentagon said. The Pentagon said the agreements build on existing federal investment in these companies, which already hold contracts across cloud computing, data infrastructure, and AI. The announcement did not disclose the value of the contracts. In its 2026 budget request, the Department of Defense said it is seeking a total of $961.6 billion, including $33.7 billion earmarked for science and technology and autonomous systems. The department said the effort will support its internal platform, GenAI.mil, launched in December with Google Gemini, adding that more than 1.3 million personnel have used it to generate tens of millions of prompts and deploy hundreds of thousands of AI agents in five months. The Pentagon said the system will support data analysis, situational awareness, and decision-making, and is designed to use multiple AI providers rather than rely on a single vendor. An Amazon Web Services spokesperson said the company plans to expand its support for U.S. military operations as the Pentagon moves forward with AI deployment on classified networks. "For more than a decade, AWS has been committed to supporting our nation's military and ensuring that our warfighters and defense partners have access to the best technology at the best value," AWS spokesperson Tim Barrett told Decrypt. "We look forward to continuing to support the Department of [Defense's] modernization efforts, building AI solutions that help them accomplish their critical missions." The agreements are part of a broader push to integrate AI across military operations. In March 2025, the Pentagon contracted Scale AI to build the Thunderforge planning system, followed by deals with OpenAI to incorporate ChatGPT and another with rival firm xAI to incorporate its Grok AI model in July 2025. Last month, the Department of Defense reached a deal with Google for classified AI work, amid a report that the NSA began deploying Anthropic's Claude Mythos on classified networks despite an ongoing dispute with the company. "As mandated by President Trump and Secretary Hegseth, the Department will continue to envelop our warfighters with advanced AI to meet the unprecedented emerging threats of tomorrow and to strengthen our Arsenal of Freedom," the Pentagon said.
[20]
Pentagon partners with seven AI firms
One of your browser extensions seems to be blocking the video player from loading. To watch this content, you may need to disable it on this site. The Pentagon says it has reached agreements with eight AI companies to use their technology in classified defence settings. The military will have access to resources provided by Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia, Oracle, OpenAI, SpaceX, and the startup Reflection. Absent from the list is Anthropic, following its public dispute and legal battle with the Trump administration over AI ethics. Peter O'Brien looks at how these developments came about.
[21]
Pentagon reaches agreements with leading AI companies
The Pentagon said on Friday it had reached agreements with seven AI companies to deploy their advanced capabilities on the Defense Department's classified networks as it seeks to diversify the range of AI companies working across the military. The statement notably excludes Anthropic, which has been in dispute with the Pentagon over guardrails for how the military could use its artificial intelligence tools. The Pentagon labeled the AI start-up, which is widely used across the Department of Defense, a supply-chain risk earlier this year, barring its use by the Pentagon and its contractors. SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services, several of which already work with the Pentagon, will be integrated into the Pentagon's Impact Levels 6 and 7 network environments giving more of the military access to their products, the Pentagon said in a statement. The Pentagon's main AI platform GenAI.mil has been used by over 1.3 million Defense Department personnel, the agency noted in its release, after five months of operation. Google, which is already used within the Pentagon, has signed a deal enabling the Department of Defense to use its artificial intelligence models for classified work, a source told Reuters earlier this week. Defense Department CTO Emil Michael on Friday told CNBC that Anthropic is still a supply chain risk, but that Mythos, the company's artificial intelligence model with advanced cyber capabilities that created a stir among officials and Corporate America over its ability to supercharge hackers, is a "separate national security moment." U.S. President Donald Trump said last week that Anthropic was "shaping up" in the eyes of his administration, opening the door for the AI company to reverse its blacklisting at the Pentagon.
[22]
You're in the army now! Why Trump 2.0 is drafting more enterprise tech vendors into its "AI-first War Department"
As the conflict in Iran rumbles on, the Russian invasion of Ukraine shows no sign of abating, and the devastation in Gaza serves to remind us, war is always with us. Of late, the role of AI in conducting future warfare has come to the forefront of public attention, largely through the highly-public tantrum thrown by the US Department of War with regard to being told what it can or cannot do with AI toys from Anthropic. The ins-and-outs of that particular spat have been well-documented and the long-term impact of the decision by Trump 2.0 to blacklist as a threat to national security a US firm that only 24 hours earlier was the only one deemed to have robust enough tech for the highest level of security work, remains to be seen and is yet to be fought out in the battlefield of the US courts. But Anthropic is inevitably absent from a list of eight other tech vendors who have now signed up with the DoW to provide AI tech and infrastructure to deploy frontier models on classified networks to support the goal of creating what Trump 2.0 is calling "an AI-first war department". As per the official blah blah: The War Department has entered into agreements with eight of the world's leading frontier artificial intelligence companies...to deploy their advanced AI capabilities on the Department's classified networks for lawful operational use. These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare. Integrating secure frontier AI capabilities into the Department's Impact Level 6 (IL6) and Impact Level 7 (IL7) network environments will streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments....This effort supports the Department's AI Acceleration Strategy by enabling new capabilities across its three core tenets of war-fighting, intelligence, and enterprise operations. The deals signed authorize the firms' AI to operate inside Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7 environments for any lawful operational use. With the kerfuffle about Anthropic's ethical red lines about AI use fresh in everyone's minds, the contracts permit "lawful operational use". One of the arguments that Trump 2.0 has used to justify its punitive actions towards Anthropic is that it cannot be held 'hostage' by the demands of suppliers, although critics note that the two pain points - no use of AI tech for autonomous weapons launching and no mass domestic surveillance of US citizens - were already in the contract that the DoW signed in the first place. But having a wider arsenal of suppliers lessens the risk of being held to account by any one supplier. The DoW confirms: The Department will continue to build an architecture that prevents AI vendor lock and ensures long-term flexibility for the Joint Force. Access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat. Together, the War Department and these strategic partners share the conviction that American leadership in AI is indispensable to national security. This leadership depends on a thriving domestic ecosystem of capable model developers that enable the full and effective use of their capabilities in support of Department missions. As mandated by President Trump and Secretary Hegseth, the Department will continue to envelop our warfighters with advanced AI to meet the unprecedented emerging threats of tomorrow and to strengthen our Arsenal of Freedom." The first seven names to be announced were Elon Musk's SpaceX, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection AI, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, and OpenAI - which leapt into the void left by Anthropic's ousting earlier in the year with what many commentators saw as unseemly haste. Following this announcement, the Undersecretary of War for Research and Engineering and Chief Technology Officer Emil Michael followed up with news that Oracle, which has 10 cloud regions dedicated to the US Government serving advanced cloud and AI capabilities at DISA IL2, IL4, IL5, IL6, Top Secret and Special Access Programs (SAP) levels, has also signed up. Kim Lynch, executive vice president of Oracle Government, Defense & Intelligence, said in a statement: By bringing advanced AI into classified environments, we are translating innovation into operational advantage where and when it matters most. Oracle understands that US warfighters require the most advanced AI capabilities to address emerging threats. Oracle's AI strategy is built around openness, interoperability, and choice across the entire technology stack. By delivering high-performance, cost-effective infrastructure and embedding generative and agentic AI directly into its enterprise software portfolio, Oracle enables the Department of War to build, deploy, and scale any model, without vendor lock-in. This approach allows the department to continuously adopt the best AI innovations available while maintaining control over their data, architecture, and long-term technology direction. Meanwhile AWS said in a statement: For more than a decade, AWS has been committed to supporting our nation's military and ensuring that our warfighters and defense partners have access to the best technology at the best value. We look forward to continuing to support the Department of War's modernization efforts, building AI solutions that help them accomplish their critical missions. Not all the vendors chosen seem so talkative about their involvement. There's no mention on the Microsoft website, for example, while Google also seems to be keeping its powder dry, perhaps wisely since just days before the Pentagon's announcement, some 600 Google staffers wrote to CEO Sundar Pichai urging him not to sign up to the deal. In an open letter, the dissenters argue that Google does not a way to guarantee its AI tech would not risk unmonitored harm: As people working on AI, we know that these systems can centralize power and that they do make mistakes. We feel that our proximity to this technology creates a responsibility to highlight and prevent its most unethical and dangerous uses. The only way to guarantee that Google does not become associated with such harms is to reject any classified workload. Google internal peer pressure has paid off in the past, most notably back in 2018 when employee protests forced a change of heart in regard to the company's involvement with Project Maven, a Pentagon initiative to use AI to analyze drone surveillance footage. Sounds all quite innocent compared to the table stakes being discussed in 2026, but I suspect that the internal dissent won't be succeeding this time around. One name notably absent from the list of suppliers is Palantir, usually first to the conscription office when it comes to anything to do with war and the US Government. But fear not, the firm hasn't suddenly become a conscientious objector. In fact there's plenty to say on that front, as a follow-up article will confirm...
[23]
Pentagon announces deals with Google, Nvidia, and others to use AI in fighting wars
Questions about military use of AI still being worked out The Pentagon's latest contracts come at a time of anxiety about the potential for over-reliance on the technology on the battlefield, said Helen Toner, interim executive director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology. "A lot of modern warfare is based on people sitting in command centers behind monitors, making complicated decisions about confusing, fast-moving situations," said Toner, a former board member of OpenAI. "AI systems can be helpful in terms of summarizing information or looking at surveillance feeds and trying to identify potential targets." But questions about the appropriate levels of human involvement, risk and training are still being worked out, she said. "How do you roll out these tools rapidly for them to be effective and provide strategic advantage?" Toner asked, "While also recognizing that you need to train the operators and make sure they know how to use them and don't over trust them?" Such concerns were raised by Anthropic. The tech company said it wanted assurances in its contract that the military would not use its technology in fully autonomous weapons and the surveillance of Americans. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the company must allow for any uses the Pentagon deemed lawful. Anthropic sued after President Donald Trump, a Republican, tried to stop all federal agencies from using the company's chatbot Claude and Hegseth sought to label the company a supply chain risk, a designation meant to protect against sabotage of national security systems by foreign adversaries. OpenAI had announced a deal with the Pentagon in March to effectively replace Anthropic with ChatGPT in classified environments. OpenAI confirmed in a statement Friday that it was the same agreement it announced in early March. "As we said when we first announced our agreement several months ago, we believe the people defending the United States should have the best tools in the world," the company said. One company's agreement with the Pentagon included language that said there should be human oversight over any missions in which the AI systems act autonomously or semiautonomously, according to a person familiar with the agreement who was not authorized to speak about it publicly. The language also said the AI tools must be used in ways that are consistent with constitutional rights and civil liberties. Those resemble sticking points for Anthropic, though OpenAI has previously said that it secured similar assurances when it made its own deal with the Pentagon. The Pentagon's point of view Emil Michael, the Pentagon's chief technology officer, told CNBC on Friday that it would have been irresponsible to rely on only one company, an acknowledgment of the friction with Anthropic. "And when we learned that one partner didn't really want to work with us in the way we wanted to work with them, we went out and made sure that we had multiple different providers," Michael said. Some of the companies, including Amazon and Microsoft, have long worked with the military in classified environments, and it was not immediately clear if the new agreements significantly altered their government partnerships. Others, such as chipmaker Nvidia and the startup Reflection, are new to such work. Both companies make open-source AI models, which Michael has described as a priority to provide an "American alternative" to China's rapid development of AI systems in which some key components are publicly accessible for others to build upon. The Pentagon said Friday that military personnel are already using its AI capabilities through its official platform, GenAI.mil. "Warfighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days," the Pentagon said, adding that the military's growing AI capabilities will "give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat." In many cases, the military uses artificial intelligence the same way civilians do: to take on rote tasks that would take humans hours or days to complete, said Toner, of Georgetown University. AI can be used to better predict when a helicopter needs maintenance or figure out how to efficiently move large amounts of troops and gear, she said. It can also help determine whether vehicles on a drone's surveillance feeds are civilian or military. But people shouldn't become overly dependent on it. "There's a phenomenon called automation bias, where people can be prone to assume that machines work better than they actually do," Toner said. O'Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.
[24]
US Military Reaches Deals With 7 Tech Companies to Use Their AI on Classified Systems
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Pentagon said Friday that it has partnered with seven tech companies to tap into their artificial intelligence in classified systems, allowing the military to boost its use of AI to help it fight wars. Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, Nvidia, OpenAI, Reflection and SpaceX will provide resources to help "augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Defense Department said. The Defense Department has been rapidly accelerating its use of AI in recent years. The technology can help the U.S. military reduce the time it takes to identify and strike targets on the battlefield, while aiding in the organization of weapons maintenance and supply lines, according to a report in March from the Brennan Center for Justice. Friday's announcement comes after concerns raised by a company not on the list, Anthropic, whose battle with the Pentagon to put up AI guardrails has spilled into court. The tech company said it wanted assurances in its contract that the military would not use its technology in fully autonomous weapons and the surveillance of Americans. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the company must allow for any uses the Pentagon deemed lawful. Anthropic sued after President Donald Trump, a Republican, tried to stop all federal agencies from using the company's chatbot Claude and Hegseth sought to label the company a supply chain risk, a designation meant to protect against sabotage of national security systems by foreign adversaries. OpenAI had announced a deal with the Pentagon in March to effectively replace Anthropic with ChatGPT in classified environments. The Pentagon said Friday that military personnel are already using its AI capabilities through its official platform, GenAI.mil. "Warfighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days," the Pentagon said, adding that the military's growing AI capabilities will "give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat." ___ Follow the AP's coverage of artificial intelligence at https://apnews.com/hub/artificial-intelligence.
[25]
Pentagon Strikes Deal With Top AI Companies Following Anthropic Fight
Pentagon Strikes Deal With Top AI Companies Following Anthropic Fight The Defense Department on Friday announced it has struck agreements with seven of the world's top AI companies following its heated public battle with Anthropic. The companies that have agreed "to deploy their advanced AI capabilities on the Department's classified networks for lawful operational use" include SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft, and Amazon Web Services, the department said. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the Pentagon said in a statement. The Wall Street Journal noted that the agreement demonstrates that many AI giants were able to overcome concerns raised by Anthropic, which prompted its fight with the department. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei "an ideological lunatic who shouldn't have a sole decision-making over what we do" during a Senate hearing Thursday. The Pentagon labeled Anthropic a "supply chain risk," prompting the company to sue the department over the designation. Amodei has since visited the White House to meet with top administration officials in recognition of the company's powerful AI models.
[26]
Pentagon reaches agreements with leading AI companies - The Economic Times
The Pentagon has struck deals with seven major AI firms. These companies will integrate their advanced AI into the Defense Department's secure networks. This move aims to boost data analysis and improve decision-making for soldiers. It signals a shift towards an AI-first military. Meanwhile, Anthropic faces restrictions due to security concerns.The Pentagon said on Friday it had reached agreements with seven leading AI companies to deploy their advanced capabilities on the Defense Department's classified networks. SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services will be integrated into the Pentagon's Impact Levels 6 and 7 network environments to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Pentagon said in a statement. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare". Another AI giant Anthropic has been in dispute with the Pentagon over guardrails for how the military could use its artificial intelligence tools, which led the Pentagon to label Anthropic a supply-chain risk last month, barring its use by the Pentagon and its contractors. The tech news site the Information reported on Tuesday that Google had joined a growing list of firms to sign a deal enabling the Department of Defense to use its artificial intelligence models for classified work. The agreement allows the Pentagon to use Google's AI for "any lawful government purpose," the report added, putting it alongside OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI, which also have deals to supply AI models for classified use.
[27]
Pentagon Reaches Agreements With Leading AI Companies
WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Friday it had reached agreements with seven leading AI companies: SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," the Pentagon said in statement. (Reporting by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Kevin Liffey)
[28]
US DoD, tech giants bid to make armed forces 'AI-first'
The Pentagon logo is seen behind the podium in the briefing room at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, US, January 8, 2020. The US Department of Defense will integrate artificial intelligence capabilities into its networks with the help of several companies, it announced in a release Friday. The companies, named as SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft, and Amazon Web Services, will "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Pentagon said. According to the DoD, the listed companies are set to integrate AI capabilities into impact levels 6 and 7 (IL6, IL7). Impact levels, ranging from 2 to 7, dictate the sensitivity of the data stored on a cloud network. Integrating AI into such highly classified structures could signify that the Pentagon views AI not just as a viable tool for its systems but also as a critical instrument for future conflict preparations. The new integrations are part of the DoD's AI Acceleration Strategy, which seeks to make the US Armed Forces "AI-First," according to a January memo from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. Although Friday's statement cautiously avoided specifying which systems are involved in the process, Hegseth's memo mentioned several ways AI is to be implemented in 2026. These range from using AI agents for intelligence sorting and simulations to "battle management" and partially or fully automated campaign planning and kill-chain execution. According to the Pentagon statement, its official AI platform, GenAI.mil, has over 1.3 million department users, already "generating tens of millions of prompts and deploying hundreds of thousands of agents" in its first five months. Further, the statement added, "fighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days." It noted that the DoD would continue to build an architecture that prevents AI vendor lock and ensures long-term flexibility for the Joint Force. Access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat." "Together," the statement continued, "the [Defense] Department and these strategic partners share the conviction that American leadership in AI is indispensable to national security. "This leadership depends on a thriving domestic ecosystem of capable model developers that enable the full and effective use of their capabilities in support of Department missions." In the past years, the role of AI in armed conflict has been a contentious topic among analysts in the field. Some consider that the use of such technology can protect soldiers while saving time and resources. Others, however, warn that removing human elements in war could cast doubt over the moral aspects of warfare.
[29]
Pentagon Links With 7 AI Giants After Anthropic Dispute | PYMNTS.com
"The Department will continue to build an architecture that prevents AI vendor lock and ensures long-term flexibility for the Joint Force," the release said. "Access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat." This announcement came about two months after the White House told federal agencies to stop using Anthropic's AI products, escalating a dispute that started inside the Defense Department but later touched the broader government. It was reported at the time that the White House's decision came just ahead of a Pentagon deadline for Anthropic to agree that the military can use its models in "all lawful use cases," a concession the company refused. Anthropic reportedly wanted contract language that would prohibit use of its models for autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance. According to the Defense Department's Friday press release, its agreements with the seven AI companies enable the deployment of their AI capabilities "for lawful operational use." These capabilities will help the Pentagon streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding and augment warfighter decision-making, supporting warfighting, intelligence and enterprise operations, according to the release. The Department said in a Friday post on X that the agreements are "the latest initiative in our mandate to create an AI-FIRST WAR DEPARTMENT." Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and assistant to the President for science and technology, said in a Friday post on X: "We are committed to ensuring our warfighters have the best tools at their disposal." The Defense Department's official AI platform, GenAI.mil, has been used by 1.3 million Department personnel who have generated tens of millions of prompts and deployed hundreds of thousands of agents over the past five months, per the Friday press release. "Warfighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days," the release said. The Defense Department announced in December 2025 that GenAI.mil was its "new bespoke AI platform" and that Google Cloud's Gemini was the first of several frontier AI capabilities to be housed on the platform. Google Cloud said at the time in a blog post that on GenAI.mil, the company's Gemini for Government AI platform would support unclassified business processes for 3 million civilian and military personnel. The Department said in its Friday press release that AI is "indispensable to national security" and that American leadership in the technology requires "a thriving domestic ecosystem of capable model developers that enable the full and effective use of their capabilities in support of Department missions."
[30]
Has Big Tech Buckled Under the Trump Admin or Is It Just a Reality of Modern Warfare?
The consolidation and diversification its AI vendor options began after the Trump regime ejected Anthropic in March. Now it has signed up Microsoft, Google, AWS and Nvidia Having first ejected Anthropic from its scheme of things and naming them a supply-chain risk, the US Department of Defence (DoD) has added Nvidia, Microsoft and AWS to its list of allies after having signed similar agreements with Google, OpenAI and SpaceX. These deals allow the Pentagon to deploy their AI tech and models for "lawful operational use." "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our war-fighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare," says a DoD statement. While the Trump administration continues to engage with Anthropic over its most recent and most powerful frontier AI model - Claude Mythos - it appears that Dario Amodei would continue to be persona non grata for the White House till the latter's lawsuits have not been disposed of. The company had questioned the administration's decision to list Anthropic as a supply-chain risk to its work, in spite of their AI being used during the ongoing Iran conflict. The deals appear to be the result of the DoD's decision to accelerate its diversification of AI vendors after their dispute with Anthropic. One that saw the AI startup being ejected from the Pentagon and all other departments of the Trump administration. The issue related to the usage terms of its AI models, whereby The Pentagon wanted unrestricted use while the AI lab sought guardrails to prevent the tech from being used for domestic surveillance and around autonomous weapons. As we write this, the legal battle continues with Anthropic getting an injunction on branding it a supply-chain risk. The Department of Defence (now also referred to by some as the Department of War) says they "will continue to build an architecture that prevents AI vendor lock-in and ensures long-term flexibility for the Joint Force." "Access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the resilient American technology stack will give war fighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat," the DoD statement says. The issue continued to rock the news cycles since Anthropic was replaced by OpenAI in the early days of March. Anthropic went public about how it was illegal to throw them out while its rival that benefitted claimed that their agreement had more guardrails than any previous ones for classified AI deployments. Right after the news broke, Sensor Tower reported a 30% surge in the number of uninstalls of the ChatGPT app from phones. These jumped a whopping 295% day-on-day on February 28 in what was quite obviously in response to Sam Altman's greed for $200 billion that Anthropic lost when the Pentagon tore up their deal with Dario Amodei's company. Thousands of tech workers rallied behind Amodei for standing up to the Trump administration. While Anthropic made a return to the White House as a cybersecurity consultant of sorts through the use of its Claude Mythos, it remains to be seen whether they make a return to the higher echelons of The Pentagon under this DoD project. For now, Amodei and his team appear to be doing their bit to win back the trust of the administration by letting banks and other establishments use their technology to plug cybersecurity loopholes. Earlier this week, Google ignored petitions from several thousand of its employees and joined hands the DoD by allowing the use of its AI models. The move comes when Big Tech is falling over one another to get on the good side of President Donald Trump, whose boys want pretty much unrestricted use of AI in autonomous weapons and surveillance. Everything else seems like a euphemism for wanting tech on the government's terms. Of course, the DoD says that the AI hardware and models would be deployed on Impact Level 6 (IL6) and Impact Level 7 (IL7) environments to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment war fighter decision-making." For the uninitiated IL6 and IL7 are high-level security classifications for data and information systems seen as critical for national security and require that these systems be protected physically, through strict access controls and audits. According to The Pentagon, there are more than 1.3 million DoD personnel who have access to its secure enterprise platform for generative AI (known as GenAI.mil) that allows users to access multiple LLMs and AI tools within government-approved cloud ecosystems. However, most of this is designed to help with non-classified uses like document drafting, data analysis and some research.
[31]
U.S. military reaches deals with 7 tech companies to use their AI on classified systems
WASHINGTON -- he Pentagon said Friday that it has reached deals with seven tech companies to use their artificial intelligence in its classified computer networks, allowing the military to tap into AI-powered capabilities to help it fight wars. Google, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, Nvidia, OpenAI, Reflection and SpaceX will provide resources to help "augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Defense Department said. The Defense Department has been rapidly accelerating its use of AI in recent years. The technology can help the U.S. military reduce the time it takes to identify and strike targets on the battlefield, while aiding in the organization of weapons maintenance and supply lines, according to a report in March from the Brennan Center for Justice. But AI has already raised concerns that its use could invade Americans' privacy or allow machines to choose targets on the battlefield. One of the companies contracting with the Pentagon said its agreement required human oversight in certain situations. Such concerns were raised by a company not on the list, Anthropic, and it is now battling the Pentagon in court. The tech company said it wanted assurances in its contract that the military would not use its technology in fully autonomous weapons and the surveillance of Americans. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the company must allow for any uses the Pentagon deemed lawful. Anthropic sued after U.S. President Donald Trump, a Republican, tried to stop all federal agencies from using the company's chatbot Claude and Hegseth sought to label the company a supply chain risk, a designation meant to protect against sabotage of national security systems by foreign adversaries. OpenAI had announced a deal with the Pentagon in March to effectively replace Anthropic with ChatGPT in classified environments. OpenAI confirmed in a statement Friday that it was the same agreement it announced in early March. "As we said when we first announced our agreement several months ago, we believe the people defending the United States should have the best tools in the world," the company said. One company's agreement with the Pentagon included language that said there should be human oversight over any missions in which the AI systems act autonomously or semi-autonomously, according to a person familiar with the agreement who was not authorized to speak about it publicly. The language also said the AI tools must be used in ways that are consistent with constitutional rights and civil liberties. Those resemble sticking points for Anthropic, though OpenAI has previously said that it secured similar assurances when it made its own deal with the Pentagon. Emil Michael, the Pentagon's chief technology officer, told CNBC on Friday that it would have been irresponsible to rely on only one company, an acknowledgement of the friction with Anthropic. "And when we learned that that one partner didn't really want to work with us in the way we wanted to work with them, we went out and made sure that we had multiple different providers," Michael said. Some of the companies, including Amazon and Microsoft, have long worked with the military in classified environments and it was not immediately clear if the new agreements significantly altered their government partnerships. Others, such as chipmaker Nvidia and the startup Reflection, are new to such work. Both companies make open-source AI models, which Michael has described as a priority to provide an "American alternative" to China's rapid development of AI systems in which some key components are publicly accessible for others to build upon. The Pentagon said Friday that military personnel are already using its AI capabilities through its official platform, GenAI.mil. "Warfighters, civilians and contractors are putting these capabilities to practical use right now, cutting many tasks from months to days," the Pentagon said, adding that the military's growing AI capabilities will "give warfighters the tools they need to act with confidence and safeguard the nation against any threat."
[32]
Pentagon reaches agreements with leading AI companies
WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) - The Pentagon said on Friday it had reached agreements with seven leading AI companies to deploy their advanced capabilities on the Defense Department's classified networks. SpaceX, OpenAI, Google, NVIDIA, Reflection, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services will be integrated into the Pentagon's Impact Levels 6 and 7 network environments to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," the Pentagon said in a statement. "These agreements accelerate the transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force and will strengthen our warfighters' ability to maintain decision superiority across all domains of warfare". Another AI giant Anthropic has been in dispute with the Pentagon over guardrails for how the military could use its artificial intelligence tools, which led the Pentagon to label Anthropic a supply-chain risk last month, barring its use by the Pentagon and its contractors. The tech news site the Information reported on Tuesday that Google had joined a growing ?list of firms to sign a deal enabling the Department of Defense to use its artificial intelligence models for classified work. The agreement allows the Pentagon to use Google's AI for "any lawful government purpose," the report added, putting it alongside OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI, which also have deals to supply AI models for classified use. (Reporting by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Kevin Liffey)
Share
Copy Link
The Pentagon has signed agreements with seven leading AI companies to deploy advanced capabilities on classified military networks. The move comes amid a contentious dispute with Anthropic over AI guardrails, with the Defense Department accelerating vendor diversification to avoid reliance on any single company.

The Pentagon has finalized agreements with AI companies including Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services, OpenAI, Google, SpaceX, and Reflection AI to deploy their advanced artificial intelligence tools on classified networks
1
. These agreements with AI companies enable the Defense Department to integrate AI hardware and models into Impact Level 6 and Impact Level 7 environments, the highest security classifications for systems deemed critical to national security1
.The deployment aims to "streamline data synthesis, elevate situational understanding, and augment warfighter decision-making in complex operational environments," according to the Pentagon's official statement
5
. Over 1.3 million Department of Defense personnel have already used GenAI.mil, the Pentagon's secure enterprise platform for generative AI, generating tens of millions of prompts and deploying hundreds of thousands of agents in just five months3
.The Pentagon has accelerated its transformation toward establishing the United States military as an AI-first fighting force, with these deals marking a strategic shift in how the military approaches technology integration
2
. Cameron Stanley, the Pentagon's chief digital and AI officer, emphasized that these partnerships will enable "human-machine teams" capable of handling immense volumes of data to make better decisions faster4
.The agreements allow for "lawful operational use" of AI systems, with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth clarifying that "humans make decisions" and AI is not making lethal decisions
4
. The Pentagon negotiated its deal with Amazon Web Services late into Thursday, according to defense officials briefed on the talks4
. Microsoft and Amazon already maintain deep relationships with the Pentagon, while contracts with Nvidia and Reflection represent new partnerships2
.Notably absent from the new agreements is Anthropic, which had a $200 million deal to handle classified materials for the Pentagon
2
. The Anthropic dispute erupted when the AI lab refused to loosen its "red lines" around mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons during renegotiations1
. The Pentagon subsequently labeled Anthropic a supply chain risk, barring its products from federal government use2
.Anthropic sued the federal government in response and won a temporary injunction in March against the Pentagon's supply chain risk designation
1
. Emil Michael, the Defense Department's chief technology officer, told CNBC that while Anthropic remains a supply chain risk, its security model Mythos represents a "separate national security moment" due to its capabilities for finding cyber vulnerabilities and patching them2
.Related Stories
The Pentagon stated that building an architecture preventing AI vendor lock-in ensures long-term flexibility for the Joint Force, with access to a diverse suite of AI capabilities from across the American technology stack
1
. Defense officials are working to ensure the military avoids depending on any single company or set of limitations4
.Warfighters, civilians, and contractors are deploying LLMs for practical applications, cutting many tasks from months to days
3
. However, campaign groups have raised concerns about relying on unpredictable AI-assisted systems for life-and-death decisions, citing risks of automation bias where operators may trust machine outputs over human reasoning4
. Research has shown AI models in wargame simulations frequently escalated to nuclear strikes, highlighting the critical importance of human oversight3
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
[2]
30 Jan 2026•Policy and Regulation

09 Nov 2024•Technology
06 Mar 2025•Technology

1
Science and Research

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
