2 Sources
[1]
'Like a billionaire on acid': Star Wars director Gareth Edwards comes out in favour of AI
Speaking at Amazon's AI on the Lot event, the Rogue One film-maker Gareth Edwards said 'it'll do anything you ask' and 'it's going to be better than CGI' Jurassic World Rebirth and Rogue One director Gareth Edwards has enthusiastically endorsed the use of generative AI in film-making, saying "it is a fucking genius at helping you" and "it's going to be better than CGI". Edwards was speaking at AI on the Lot, an event in Culver City, California, organised by Amazon, and in remarks reported by the Hollywood Reporter said: "I can't see a reason why you wouldn't become interested in this stuff as a film-maker. It's so clearly a tool that might be up there with the camera. It's going to be better than CGI." Edwards said that AI is most useful in the preparatory stages of film-making, saying: "It's only good for iteration and discovering what the movie should be, and then once you know what it is, go in and start making it your movie." He added: "It has no taste whatsoever. It is a fucking genius at helping you. I view it like having a second-unit director who is a billionaire on acid. Like, it'll do anything you ask, not a problem. Sometimes, it'll [go] batshit crazy. And you'll give it notes, and it'll be like, 'I don't do notes. I'll just do something totally different.' But it's worth it." Edwards' positive view of AI was echoed by veteran writer and director Paul Schrader, who was also speaking at the event. In remarks reported by Deadline, Schrader said: "I don't think the real future of AI commercially is in all this flash, all these monsters - that's just jacked-up special effects on steroids," he said. "The real tip of the spear is when we can create an AI protagonist, not a hybrid, and that movie makes money. When you do the new Clint Eastwood, but you don't say the words 'Clint Eastwood' to AI, you just describe him. And he comes up as Clint Eastwood." Schrader added: "And the movie comes out, and us carbon-based fools spend our money empathising and caring about silicon-based creations." Schrader, director of American Gigolo and First Reformed as well as the writer of the Martin Scorsese-directed Taxi Driver, said that extras were also no longer needed. "Why are we paying extras $180 a day when they look so plastic? We not only pay them, we have to clothe them and feed them. Why don't we just make them? We can and we will." So far, films using gen AI images have not gone down well with critics, including Steven Soderbergh's documentary John Lennon: The Last Interview, whose AI inserts the Guardian's Peter Bradshaw described as "blandly generic and very mediocre". Edwards, however, said that the pace of change in AI technology meant that it was impossible to predict its future. "We don't know where it's going to go. I think anybody saying they know exactly what's going to happen over the next five years is just a liar."
[2]
Gareth Edwards Is Excited About AI Filmmaking -- Even Thought It's Like a "Second-Unit Director Who Is a Billionaire on Acid
Director Gareth Edwards isn't afraid of generative AI and what it may portend for Hollywood. In fact, he's pumped about it. The helmer of Jurassic World Rebirth and Rogue One has been experimenting with diffusion models in depth for the last nine months and even wants to create a hybrid generative AI film, he said on a panel on Thursday. But he isn't doing so yet, because the rate at which technological developments are occurring might outpace the filmmaking process. "It feels like this stuff's changing every three months," he said. "It's like we have to revisit the plan six months from now because it might be a totally different series of tools. And the things that ... weren't possible three months ago or six months ago, some of them are now possible." His interest is perhaps unsurprising, given that he directed 2023's The Creator, a sci-fi film that largely took a positive approach to the topic of artificial intelligence. But his public embrace of the technology is still rare amongst his cohort, a.k.a. directors entrusted with big-budget IP properties. Edwards, who made the remarks during a panel about world-building at Amazon's AI on the Lot event in Culver City, started his professional career doing visual effects, and compared the rise of AI to the mainstream arrival of CGI in movies in the '90s. Still, he believes AI might be more impactful. "I can't see a reason why you wouldn't become interested in this stuff as a filmmaker. It's so clearly a tool that might be up there with the camera. It's going to be be better than CGI," he told the assembled audience. "I'm excited, I hope you are." Still, he argued that generative AI is primarily helpful in terms of organizing ideas, testing concepts and producing images, rather than generating human stories that resonate with audiences. "It has no taste whatsoever. It is a fucking genius at helping you," Edwards said. "I view it like having a second-unit director who is a billionaire on acid. Like, it'll do anything you ask, not a problem. Sometimes it'll [go] batshit crazy. And you'll give it notes, and it'll be like, 'I don't do notes. I'll just do something totally different.' But it's worth it." Though AI won't transform any random movie fan into a good filmmaker, it might allow more people to "enter the competition" by allowing them to develop trailers for their concepts and produce work at a lower cost. "It's only good for iteration and discovering what the movie should be, and then once you know what it is, go in and start making it your movie," Edwards said. He emphasized throughout his remarks that AI filmmaking requires oversight, with a filmmaker needing to frequently prompt a tool to realize a specific creative vision. Doing so isn't so different from intense level of decisionmaking involved in designing shots on a traditional film or TV show, he said. Still, the director was clear that he doesn't know where AI in Hollywood is headed. "We don't know where it's going to go," he said. "I think anybody saying they know exactly what's going to happen over the next five years is just a liar." Edwards, one of the highest-profile creatives to appear at Amazon's event, followed an appearance earlier in the day by American Gigolo and First Reformed director Paul Schrader. Schrader was more bullish on the storytelling capabilities of generative AI, describing an attempt he made to create a story idea in his wheelhouse using ChatGPT. "I could send it out," he said of the result. "I know what response I would get: This is second-rate Schrader... but it's going to be first-rate Schrader soon enough."
Share
Copy Link
Gareth Edwards publicly endorsed generative AI in filmmaking at Amazon's AI on the Lot event, describing it as a tool that could rival the camera itself. The Rogue One and Jurassic World Rebirth director has been experimenting with AI for nine months and believes it excels at iteration and pre-production, though he cautions it lacks creative taste and requires constant oversight.
Gareth Edwards, the director behind Rogue One and Jurassic World Rebirth, has emerged as one of Hollywood's most vocal advocates for generative AI in filmmaking. Speaking at Amazon's AI on the Lot event in Culver City, California, Edwards declared that AI in filmmaking represents a tool "that might be up there with the camera" and predicted it would surpass CGI in its impact on the film industry
1
2
. His enthusiastic endorsement marks a rare public embrace of the technology among directors entrusted with major studio projects, particularly given ongoing tensions in Hollywood over AI's role in creative work.
Source: THR
Edwards has been experimenting with diffusion models for the past nine months and even expressed interest in creating a hybrid generative AI film, though he acknowledged that rapid technological developments might outpace the filmmaking process
2
. "It feels like this stuff's changing every three months," he explained, noting that capabilities impossible just months ago are now achievable.In one of the event's most memorable characterizations, Edwards described AI as a filmmaking tool like "having a second-unit director who is a billionaire on acid." He elaborated: "It'll do anything you ask, not a problem. Sometimes, it'll [go] batshit crazy. And you'll give it notes, and it'll be like, 'I don't do notes. I'll just do something totally different.' But it's worth it"
1
2
.Despite his enthusiasm, Edwards was clear about generative AI's limitations. "It has no taste whatsoever. It is a fucking genius at helping you," he said, emphasizing that AI as a filmmaking tool excels primarily in pre-production and conceptual development rather than storytelling
2
. He stressed that AI filmmaking requires constant oversight and frequent prompting to realize a specific creative vision, a process not unlike the intense decision-making involved in traditional film production.Edwards positioned generative AI as most valuable during preparatory stages, stating: "It's only good for iteration and discovering what the movie should be, and then once you know what it is, go in and start making it your movie"
1
2
. This approach suggests AI serves as a creative tool for testing concepts and producing images rather than replacing human storytelling.The director, who started his career in visual effects, drew parallels between AI's emergence and the mainstream arrival of CGI in the 1990s, though he believes AI's impact may prove even more significant
2
. He suggested that while AI won't transform casual movie fans into accomplished filmmakers, it could democratize access by allowing more people to "enter the competition" through lower-cost development of trailers and proof-of-concept work.Related Stories
Edwards wasn't alone in his optimism at the AI on the Lot event. Veteran writer and director Paul Schrader, known for American Gigolo, First Reformed, and writing Taxi Driver, offered even bolder predictions about AI's role in Hollywood. Schrader argued that "the real tip of the spear" isn't flashy special effects but the creation of AI protagonists that audiences will emotionally invest in
1
."When you do the new Clint Eastwood, but you don't say the words 'Clint Eastwood' to AI, you just describe him. And he comes up as Clint Eastwood," Schrader explained, envisioning a future where "carbon-based fools spend our money empathising and caring about silicon-based creations"
1
. He also suggested that extras are becoming obsolete, questioning why productions pay extras $180 a day when AI-generated figures could replace them without the costs of clothing and feeding human performers.Schrader described experimenting with ChatGPT to generate story ideas in his signature style, acknowledging the result was "second-rate Schrader" but predicting "it's going to be first-rate Schrader soon enough"
2
.Despite his enthusiasm, Edwards acknowledged the unpredictability surrounding AI's trajectory in the film industry. "We don't know where it's going to go," he admitted. "I think anybody saying they know exactly what's going to happen over the next five years is just a liar"
1
2
.This uncertainty is compounded by mixed critical reception to early AI-generated content. Films incorporating generative AI images have struggled with critics, including Steven Soderbergh's documentary John Lennon: The Last Interview, whose AI elements were described as "blandly generic and very mediocre"
1
.Edwards' public stance is particularly notable given his work on 2023's The Creator, a sci-fi film that took a largely positive approach to artificial intelligence. His willingness to champion AI technology places him at the forefront of a debate that continues to divide Hollywood, where concerns about job displacement and creative authenticity clash with enthusiasm for new possibilities in storytelling and production efficiency.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
19 May 2026•Entertainment and Society

01 Apr 2026•Entertainment and Society

17 Mar 2026•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
