Rogue One Director Gareth Edwards Embraces AI in Filmmaking, Calls It Better Than CGI

2 Sources

Share

Gareth Edwards publicly endorsed generative AI in filmmaking at Amazon's AI on the Lot event, describing it as a tool that could rival the camera itself. The Rogue One and Jurassic World Rebirth director has been experimenting with AI for nine months and believes it excels at iteration and pre-production, though he cautions it lacks creative taste and requires constant oversight.

Gareth Edwards Champions AI as a Filmmaking Tool

Gareth Edwards, the director behind Rogue One and Jurassic World Rebirth, has emerged as one of Hollywood's most vocal advocates for generative AI in filmmaking. Speaking at Amazon's AI on the Lot event in Culver City, California, Edwards declared that AI in filmmaking represents a tool "that might be up there with the camera" and predicted it would surpass CGI in its impact on the film industry

1

2

. His enthusiastic endorsement marks a rare public embrace of the technology among directors entrusted with major studio projects, particularly given ongoing tensions in Hollywood over AI's role in creative work.

Source: THR

Source: THR

Edwards has been experimenting with diffusion models for the past nine months and even expressed interest in creating a hybrid generative AI film, though he acknowledged that rapid technological developments might outpace the filmmaking process

2

. "It feels like this stuff's changing every three months," he explained, noting that capabilities impossible just months ago are now achievable.

AI as a 'Billionaire on Acid' Creative Partner

In one of the event's most memorable characterizations, Edwards described AI as a filmmaking tool like "having a second-unit director who is a billionaire on acid." He elaborated: "It'll do anything you ask, not a problem. Sometimes, it'll [go] batshit crazy. And you'll give it notes, and it'll be like, 'I don't do notes. I'll just do something totally different.' But it's worth it"

1

2

.

Despite his enthusiasm, Edwards was clear about generative AI's limitations. "It has no taste whatsoever. It is a fucking genius at helping you," he said, emphasizing that AI as a filmmaking tool excels primarily in pre-production and conceptual development rather than storytelling

2

. He stressed that AI filmmaking requires constant oversight and frequent prompting to realize a specific creative vision, a process not unlike the intense decision-making involved in traditional film production.

Where AI Fits in the Production Process

Edwards positioned generative AI as most valuable during preparatory stages, stating: "It's only good for iteration and discovering what the movie should be, and then once you know what it is, go in and start making it your movie"

1

2

. This approach suggests AI serves as a creative tool for testing concepts and producing images rather than replacing human storytelling.

The director, who started his career in visual effects, drew parallels between AI's emergence and the mainstream arrival of CGI in the 1990s, though he believes AI's impact may prove even more significant

2

. He suggested that while AI won't transform casual movie fans into accomplished filmmakers, it could democratize access by allowing more people to "enter the competition" through lower-cost development of trailers and proof-of-concept work.

Paul Schrader Envisions AI Protagonists

Edwards wasn't alone in his optimism at the AI on the Lot event. Veteran writer and director Paul Schrader, known for American Gigolo, First Reformed, and writing Taxi Driver, offered even bolder predictions about AI's role in Hollywood. Schrader argued that "the real tip of the spear" isn't flashy special effects but the creation of AI protagonists that audiences will emotionally invest in

1

.

"When you do the new Clint Eastwood, but you don't say the words 'Clint Eastwood' to AI, you just describe him. And he comes up as Clint Eastwood," Schrader explained, envisioning a future where "carbon-based fools spend our money empathising and caring about silicon-based creations"

1

. He also suggested that extras are becoming obsolete, questioning why productions pay extras $180 a day when AI-generated figures could replace them without the costs of clothing and feeding human performers.

Schrader described experimenting with ChatGPT to generate story ideas in his signature style, acknowledging the result was "second-rate Schrader" but predicting "it's going to be first-rate Schrader soon enough"

2

.

An Uncertain Future for AI in Film

Despite his enthusiasm, Edwards acknowledged the unpredictability surrounding AI's trajectory in the film industry. "We don't know where it's going to go," he admitted. "I think anybody saying they know exactly what's going to happen over the next five years is just a liar"

1

2

.

This uncertainty is compounded by mixed critical reception to early AI-generated content. Films incorporating generative AI images have struggled with critics, including Steven Soderbergh's documentary John Lennon: The Last Interview, whose AI elements were described as "blandly generic and very mediocre"

1

.

Edwards' public stance is particularly notable given his work on 2023's The Creator, a sci-fi film that took a largely positive approach to artificial intelligence. His willingness to champion AI technology places him at the forefront of a debate that continues to divide Hollywood, where concerns about job displacement and creative authenticity clash with enthusiasm for new possibilities in storytelling and production efficiency.

Today's Top Stories

TheOutpost.ai

Don’t drown in AI news. We cut through the noise - filtering, ranking and summarizing the most important AI news, breakthroughs and research daily. Spend less time searching for the latest in AI and get straight to action.

Instagram logo
LinkedIn logo
Youtube logo
© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved