2 Sources
[1]
Fix AI's data theft problem with onchain attribution
Opinion by: Ram Kumar, core contributor at OpenLedger The public has knowingly contributed to the rise of artificial intelligence, often without realizing it. As AI models are projected to generate trillions of dollars in value, it's time to start treating data like labor and building onchain
[2]
Can We Prevent AI From Becoming Another Web2-style Monopoly?
Enter your email to get Benzinga's ultimate morning update: The PreMarket Activity Newsletter For all its promises, AI today is facing a deepening crisis of trust. The tools we now use daily, from ChatGPT and Midjourney to AI-powered medical assistants and financial copilots, are trained on data
Share
Copy Link
As AI technology advances, concerns about data attribution, fairness, and monopolization grow. Blockchain-based solutions like Payable AI are proposed to create a more equitable and transparent AI ecosystem.
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance at a rapid pace, concerns about data attribution, fairness, and potential monopolization are becoming increasingly prominent. Two recent opinion pieces highlight the need for a more equitable and transparent AI ecosystem, proposing blockchain-based solutions like Payable AI to address these issues
1
2
.AI models, such as ChatGPT, are being trained on vast amounts of data, often collected without explicit consent from users. This has led to a situation where major tech companies are reaping billions in profits while the individuals who unknowingly contributed to these models receive no compensation or recognition
1
.Ram Kumar, a core contributor at OpenLedger, argues that this scenario represents "invisible labor" on a global scale, with billions of people becoming an unpaid workforce behind the AI revolution
1
. The lack of attribution and compensation for data contributors is not only a matter of fairness but also raises questions about power dynamics in the AI industry.The opaque nature of AI development has resulted in a significant erosion of trust. According to Edelman's 2024 Trust Barometer, global trust in AI companies has fallen to 53%, down from 61% five years ago. In the United States, this figure has plummeted to 35%
2
. This decline in trust comes at a time when AI is becoming increasingly integrated into critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and finance.To address these concerns, both opinion pieces advocate for the implementation of Payable AI, a framework that would embed attribution, accountability, and rewards directly into the AI development lifecycle
1
2
. This system would utilize blockchain technology to create a transparent and auditable ledger of contributions to AI models.Key features of the proposed Payable AI system include:
1
.1
.2
.Related Stories
Blockchain technology is presented as a crucial component in creating a more equitable AI ecosystem. It can provide the missing economic layer that tracks who contributes to AI models, who benefits, and how decisions are made
2
. This transparency could help prevent the centralization of power in a few AI labs and ensure that value flows back to those who create it.As AI agents become more autonomous and start generating revenue, the need for fair attribution and compensation becomes increasingly urgent. Without a system like Payable AI, there is a risk that AI development will follow the same trajectory as Web2, with a handful of giants extracting disproportionate value
2
.The implementation of such a system would require new rights, infrastructure, and legal frameworks. These would include the right to attribution, compensation, and the ability to audit systems built on personal data
1
.As the AI industry continues to evolve, the call for more transparent and equitable systems grows louder. The proposed Payable AI framework, leveraging blockchain technology, offers a potential solution to address the current shortcomings in AI development and ensure a fairer distribution of benefits in the AI-driven future.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
06 Oct 2025•Policy and Regulation

20 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation
06 Aug 2026•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Technology

3
Technology
