3 Sources
[1]
A top economist says there's "zero evidence" AI is killing jobs, despite thousands of actual layoffs
Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. A hot potato: Concerned that your job could become one of the many lost to AI? According to Apollo Global Management's chief economist, you're worrying about nothing! Torsten Sløk claims that there
[2]
'Zero evidence': Apollo's chief economist says AI-related job losses aren't happening
* Torsten Sløk says there's been "zero evidence" of AI-induced job losses * Hiring for AI specialists, data center staff and more has surged * Jevons Paradox has caused increased demand, despite efficiency Apollo Global Management's chief economist Torsten Sløk declared in a blog post that
[3]
Top Economist Says There Is 'Zero Evidence' Of AI Job Losses Despite Growing Layoff Fears - Apollo Global
In a blog post on Friday, titled Zero Evidence of AI-Related Job Losses, Sløk cited ADP employment data and said companies are increasingly hiring AI implementation specialists while data center construction is boosting demand for workers, semiconductors, equipment and energy. He argued that the
Share
Copy Link
Apollo Global Management's chief economist Torsten Sløk argues there's no proof artificial intelligence is eliminating jobs, pointing to rising employment data. But the claim contradicts widespread tech industry layoffs at companies like Wix, Block, Meta, and Amazon, where AI has been explicitly cited as the reason for cutting thousands of positions.
Torsten Sløk, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, has sparked debate by declaring there is "zero evidence" of AI job losses, despite mounting concerns about artificial intelligence reshaping the workforce
1
. In a blog post titled "Zero Evidence of AI-Related Job Losses," Sløk cited ADP employment data showing private companies added almost 110,000 people to their payrolls in April1
. Rather than reducing headcounts, Sløk argues many firms are hiring AI implementation experts, data center staff, and infrastructure workers to support the AI boom and employment expansion2
.
Source: TechRadar
Sløk's analysis leans heavily on Jevons Paradox, an economic theory suggesting that greater efficiency can paradoxically increase overall demand rather than reduce it
3
. "The bottom line is that the AI spending boom is stoking both employment and inflation," Sløk writes, describing how cheaper technology creates more demand and more jobs1
. He reframed AI's impact on job displacement as a shift rather than a net loss, noting that sectors most impacted by AI—including semiconductors, data centers, energy, networking, and cloud—are experiencing wage growth and increased hiring2
.The claim that AI killing jobs is unfounded appears disconnected from reality for thousands of displaced workers. There have been almost 116,000 tech industry layoffs so far in 2025, quickly approaching the 124,000 seen for the entirety of 2024, with a massive number tied to AI through direct job replacement or resources redirected toward AI infrastructure
1
. Just last week, Wix laid off 1,000 people while citing the "fast evolution" of AI1
. Earlier this year, Block laid off over 4,000 people and explicitly stated it was because AI reduced staffing needs, while Intuit, Meta, Amazon, Cisco, and IBM have all made similar moves1
.Source: TechSpot
Related Stories
Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported that AI was the leading reason cited for announced layoffs in April, accounting for 21,490 planned job cuts
3
. Senator Elizabeth Warren recently warned that artificial intelligence could trigger mass layoffs and called for stronger worker protections if large-scale displacement occurs3
. A recent survey of almost 1,000 executives found that 99% expected AI to lead to reduced worker numbers at their companies in the next two years1
.
Source: Benzinga
Sløk's position aligns with recent statements from tech executives heavily invested in AI. OpenAI boss Sam Altman said he was "delighted" that his AI jobs apocalypse prediction was wrong, while Box CEO Aaron Levie, Dell boss Michael Dell, and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon have expressed similar opinions . Critics argue that companies often label cost-cutting measures as AI-related job losses to justify decisions driven by overhiring and changing priorities
2
. While jobs are being created through AI adoption, many tech giants cutting workers have simultaneously opened positions in high-growth areas, supporting the narrative of workforce transformation rather than elimination2
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
05 Sept 2025•Business and Economy

30 Jun 2026•Business and Economy

01 Oct 2025•Business and Economy

1
Science and Research

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology