2 Sources
[1]
UK AI - changing copyright won't work. So, what will?
The UK's creative communities have an unexpected ally in their fight against government plans to change copyright law: the UK's AI industry. As my previous report explained, UKAI - the national trade body for AI innovators - has rejected proposals to tear up copyright conventions and thus allow AI
[2]
'Abandon proposed changes to copyright law!', urges UK AI industry
As messages to government go, this one is stark and to the point: Existing copyright law is adequate and should not be changed to an opt-out model. The proposed opt-out would significantly harm the creative sectors to achieve a minimal gain for a small group of global tech companies. Were these
Share
Copy Link
UKAI, the UK's AI trade body, rejects proposed copyright law changes and advocates for transparency, collaboration, and fair solutions between AI and creative industries.

In a surprising turn of events, the UK's AI industry has emerged as an unexpected ally for the creative communities in their fight against proposed changes to copyright law. UKAI, the national trade body for AI innovators, has rejected the government's plans to alter copyright conventions, which would allow AI companies to train Large Language Models and generative AIs on proprietary data without explicit permission
1
.UKAI's report, titled "Creative Industries & AI. Conflict or Co-operation: Shining a Light on Solutions," strongly opposes the proposed opt-out model for copyright. The organization argues that changing the copyright law would "significantly harm the creative sectors to achieve a minimal gain for a small group of global tech companies"
2
. UKAI believes that such a move would erode public trust in the nascent AI sector and create unnecessary conflict.One of the key recommendations from UKAI is the need for transparency in AI training processes. The report emphasizes that much of the current mistrust stems from the opaque nature of how generative AI companies train their models. UKAI suggests creating publicly accessible records of all datasets used for training Gen-AI models, arguing that data sources should not form part of AI companies' intellectual property
1
.UKAI advocates for cooperation between the AI industry and creative sectors to find fair solutions through constructive dialogue. The organization hosted a roundtable discussion between AI vendors and senior representatives of Britain's creative industries, which formed the basis of their report
2
.The report calls for a full assessment of the economic impact of changing UK copyright law. This comes in the wake of significant public opposition to the proposed changes, including a unified front-page campaign by national newspapers and a protest album released by over 1,000 musicians
2
.Related Stories
The report also highlights concerns about the potential dominance of AI-generated content. A study by TollBit found that AI search engines refer 96% less traffic to news sites and blogs than traditional Google searches, raising questions about the future of online content creation and distribution
1
.While some debate exists about whether copyright is the right tool for the future, UKAI and many in the creative industries argue that it remains a crucial protection for creators' rights. The organization emphasizes the need for fair compensation, noting that while AI companies pay for other resources, they seem reluctant to pay for content used in training their models
2
.As the debate continues, UKAI's stance represents a significant voice in shaping the future relationship between AI development and creative industries in the UK.
Summarized by
Navi
[1]
14 Mar 2025•Policy and Regulation

18 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation

15 Jan 2025•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
