3 Sources
[1]
Art Directors Guild Chides Martin Scorsese Over His Newfound Fondness for AI
Art directors are really having a moment. Not only did the art director on indie sensation Obsession make waves recently with a round of discourse about compensation, but now the Art Directors Guild is drawing a line in the sand between itself and Hollywood icon Martin Scorsese after the living
[2]
Martin Scorsese's promotion of AI company called a 'betrayal' by director's union
Oscar-winning director Martin Scorsese, usually hailed as a master filmmaker and scholar of cinema, is facing backlash for promoting a company that offers generative AI products. The director of classics such as "Raging Bull" and "Goodfellas" spoke about embracing artificial intelligence as a
[3]
Art Directors Guild Claps Back at Martin Scorsese's Promotion of AI Tool
The Art Directors Guild is not happy with Martin Scorsese's promotion of an AI tool for storyboarding. The Studio City-based crew union clapped back at the Killers of the Flower Moon director on Tuesday for a recent ad he filmed with startup Black Forest Labs. In the video spot, Scorsese -- an
Share
Copy Link
Martin Scorsese's partnership with Black Forest Labs has ignited fierce backlash from the Art Directors Guild. The legendary filmmaker endorsed using AI for storyboarding, claiming it helps communicate his vision more clearly. But the union representing art department professionals called it a betrayal, arguing the technology threatens jobs while being built on work likely stolen from artists worldwide.
Martin Scorsese, the Oscar-winning director behind classics like "Raging Bull" and "Goodfellas," has sparked controversy by joining Black Forest Labs as an advisor and promoting the company's generative AI model Flux
1
. In a video posted by the AI startup, Scorsese demonstrated creating a storyboard featuring a medieval street using the technology, praising its "cinematic intelligence"3
. The director told the New York Times he's interested in using AI for storyboarding—the preproduction process of visualizing scripts and blocking scenes before shooting begins2
.
Source: THR
"For 70 years, I've been creating my own storyboards," Scorsese explained. "There's always been this problem of how do you communicate what you see in your head to your cast and crew. Now with this tool I can share what I'm visualizing more clearly and efficiently to my creative team—the production designer, art designer and cinematographer"
1
. He emphasized that cinema is only around 125 years old and filmmakers must remain open to how it can evolve2
.The Art Directors Guild Local 800, a chapter of the IATSE union, issued a scathing open letter Wednesday directly addressing Scorsese and accusing him of "turning his back on the human artists who throughout his career have helped him create his most memorable works"
2
. The ADG represents storyboard artists, concept artists, illustrators, graphic artists, set designers, production designers, and other art department professionals—the very workers whose roles Scorsese's AI endorsement appears to threaten3
."He claims the solution is the use of this generative AI program to do the jobs that are rightfully the jurisdiction of Art Directors Guild Local 800 artists and designers—human artists and designers who have been successfully collaborating with directors to visualize their films for decades," the union stated
1
. The guild took particular issue with Scorsese's suggestion that he needs AI to communicate his creative vision, arguing that union members have performed this exact function throughout cinema history.The ADG's statement emphasized that Scorsese's promotion of AI for storyboarding "circumvents the input of Art Directors Guild Local 800 art directors, graphic artists, illustrators, production designers, scenic artists, set designers, and other talented Union professionals"
2
. The union also pointed out a fundamental ethical concern: generative AI models can only produce outputs by studying copyrighted material, likely without consent, credit, or compensation to original artists2
."To think their professional contributions can be mimicked or outshone by generative AI, which is built on work likely stolen from them and many other artists from around the world, is a betrayal of the collaborative nature of cinema," the letter stated
3
. This criticism strikes at the heart of ongoing debates about how AI companies train their models and whether they should compensate artists whose work forms the foundation of these systems.Related Stories
The timing of Scorsese's AI partnership is particularly sensitive for the ADG, which has been hit hard by recent contraction in the entertainment business. In 2024, the union paused a training program for young professionals due to mass unemployment among union members in covered crafts
3
. According to annual filings with the Department of Labor, the union's membership declined from 3,492 in 2022 to 2,966 in 2025—a significant drop that underscores the precarious position of art department professionals3
.A 2024 study commissioned by the Animation Guild and The Concept Art Association identified ADG members as among those most threatened by generative AI technology
3
. For an industry already grappling with job losses, the endorsement of AI tools by one of cinema's most respected figures represents more than philosophical disagreement—it signals potential acceleration of job displacement that's already underway. Scorsese has previously spoken about AI as a tool for the next generation of filmmakers to explore, but as one report noted, he's now shown them "one use that they absolutely should not explore"1
.Summarized by
Navi
02 Jun 2026•Entertainment and Society

20 Feb 2026•Entertainment and Society

19 May 2026•Entertainment and Society

1
Technology

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Technology
