Claude AI exploited to breach CBSE portal, exposing critical cybersecurity vulnerabilities

2 Sources

Share

A high-level expert panel from IIT Kanpur and IIT Madras discovered that Claude AI was used to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in CBSE's On-Screen Marking portal. The investigation revealed the vendor, Coempt Edutech, lacked adequate security knowledge, prompting an emergency data migration to government-controlled AWS infrastructure and triggering broader concerns about AI-assisted probing of India's examination systems.

Claude AI Identifies Security Gaps in Education Infrastructure

AI tools, primarily Claude AI, were used to detect cybersecurity vulnerabilities and gain unauthorized access to the CBSE On-Screen Marking portal, according to findings from a high-level expert panel deployed by IIT Kanpur and IIT Madras

1

. The discovery marks a significant moment in understanding how accessible AI tools can be weaponized for AI-assisted probing of critical digital infrastructure. The CBSE portal breach exposed fundamental weaknesses in how educational institutions approach digital security, particularly as they rush to implement technology-driven evaluation systems.

Source: Digit

Source: Digit

The IIT Panel found that Coempt Edutech, the vendor responsible for the CBSE On-Screen Marking portal, did not possess adequate capability or conceptual knowledge about portal security mechanisms

1

. This revelation raises questions about procurement processes across government bodies. The system was not equipped to withstand the kind of AI-assisted probing that has become increasingly accessible to both ethical hackers and malicious actors

2

.

Emergency Data Migration and Vendor Security Measures Under Scrutiny

With strong support from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), CBSE-OSM data was immediately shifted from the private vendor to a government-managed and controlled segment of Amazon Web Services India

1

. This emergency migration underscores the severity of the security lapses. The expert panel, deployed for a week, played a crucial role in ensuring the CBSE verification and re-evaluation portal went live on June 2, albeit a day late

1

.

The panel also completed security audits of the JEE Advanced portal and Joint Seat Allocation Authority on Wednesday, addressing vulnerabilities after copies of admit cards linked to JEE Advanced emerged on social media earlier that week. CERT-In has been asked to conduct a comprehensive security audit of the CBSE portal while MeitY coordinates with NTA and CBSE to prevent further incidents.

Widespread Attack Patterns Reveal Systemic Weaknesses

The CBSE incident is part of a broader pattern of cyber pressure on India's examination infrastructure. One NTA digital portal was hit by approximately 500,000 attempts on Sunday, the same day CUET was disrupted by technical glitches that prevented over 3,700 students from appearing for the exam

1

. CBSE itself reported a denial-of-service attack causing 1.5 million hits within two minutes and more than 100,000 unauthorized file access attempts

1

. Additionally, CBSE faced a 3.8 million-packet denial-of-service attack that was successfully blocked

2

.

Cybersecurity researcher Nisarga Adhikary, 19, publicly claimed he had found significant flaws in the portal months before the controversy exploded, describing it as "one of the easiest hacks of my life" that required no programming knowledge

2

. He reported the issues to CERT-In and other authorities but received inadequate response before going public. While CBSE stated the site Adhikary referenced was a testing environment with sample data, the findings about Claude and other AI tools being used to find entry points extend beyond any single researcher's claims

2

.

Data Breaches Trigger Leadership Changes and Policy Reforms

In the aftermath, CBSE's Chairman Rahul Singh and Secretary Himanshu Gupta have both been replaced, with senior IAS officer Lokhande Prashant Sitaram appointed as the new Chairperson

2

. A single-member inquiry committee has been established to examine the OSM procurement process. An advisory has been issued to key departments emphasizing the need for cybersecurity hygiene in digital services procurement from the design stage itself

1

.

MeitY officials emphasize the general lack of "elementary hygiene" in rushed, over-ambitious technology transition targets by government departments

1

. The advisory stresses exercising caution in procurement processes and fully ascertaining the capacity and capability of private vendors before deployment. During a January 2026 dry run, evaluators had already flagged problems including marks discrepancies, no auto-save feature, poor interface design, and excessive cognitive load, yet the system was deployed across all subjects despite initial assurances it would only apply to non-academic subjects[2](https://www.digit.in/news/general/claude-ai-reported used-to-breach-cbse-evaluation-portal-what-the-report-says.html). This pattern suggests systemic failures in heeding early warnings and prioritizing security over implementation timelines.

Today's Top Stories