Elon Musk admits xAI trained Grok on OpenAI models, exposing AI industry's distillation tactics

Elon Musk Confirms xAI Used Distillation on OpenAI Models

In a California federal courtroom on Thursday, Elon Musk made a striking admission during his lawsuit against OpenAI: his AI startup xAI has used OpenAI's models to improve its own Grok chatbot 1

1

. When questioned by OpenAI attorney William Savitt about whether xAI trained Grok on OpenAI models using distillation techniques, Musk initially deflected, stating that "generally all the AI companies" engage in such practices 2

2

. Pressed further on whether that meant "yes," Musk responded, "Partly" 3

3

.

The Elon Musk testimony represents a rare public acknowledgment by a major AI developer of a practice that has intensified tensions between competing AI companies 4

4

. AI model distillation is a technique where a smaller AI model learns to mimic the behavior of a larger, more capable model, making it cheaper and faster to run while preserving much of its performance. This allows software makers to create models that are nearly as capable without the same investment in compute infrastructure that frontier labs have made.

Why the xAI vs OpenAI Admission Matters

Musk's acknowledgment carries particular weight given the context of his lawsuit against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and co-founder Greg Brockman. The case centers on allegations that OpenAI abandoned its founding non-profit mission to develop AI for humanity by shifting to a for-profit structure through its partnership with Microsoft 5

5

. The irony is palpable: while Musk challenges OpenAI's ethical foundations, his own company appears to have leveraged OpenAI's technology to accelerate development.

Launched in July 2023, xAI entered a market years after OpenAI, Google, and other established players had built substantial leads 4

4

. For a company with just a few hundred employees, as Musk characterized it during testimony, using distillation techniques on the then-leader's models would offer a strategic shortcut to competitive capabilities 1

1

.

AI Industry Practice Under Growing Scrutiny

While Musk defended the approach as standard practice, stating that companies use other AI systems "to validate your AI," the revelation exposes tensions around what constitutes fair competition versus intellectual property theft 3

3

. Distillation is not explicitly illegal, but it may violate the terms of service companies set for APIs and their products 1

1

.

The controversy around training AI models through distillation has intensified as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google have accused Chinese firms like DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax of using the technique to create open-weight models that replicate U.S. capabilities at a fraction of the cost 3

3

. In February 2026, OpenAI wrote in a memo to a House committee that it had "taken steps to protect and harden our models against distillation," focusing on ensuring China couldn't advance "autocratic AI by appropriating and repackaging American innovation" 2

2

.

Frontier Labs Fighting Back Against Distillation

OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google have reportedly launched an initiative through the Frontier Model Forum to share information about combating distillation attempts, which typically involve systematic querying of models through APIs to understand their inner workings 1

1

. These frontier labs are working to prevent users from making suspicious mass queries that signal distillation efforts.

In August 2025, Anthropic blocked OpenAI's access to its Claude coding models after alleging terms of service violations, and more recently cut off xAI from using its AI models for coding as well 2

2

. Google has also taken steps to prevent what it calls "distillation attacks," describing them as "a method of intellectual property theft that violates Google's terms of service" 3

3

.

What This Means for AI Ethics and Competition

Musk's admission that xAI trained Grok on OpenAI models reveals that distillation techniques are not just a foreign threat but a domestic AI industry practice among U.S. companies 4

4

. This undermines the narrative that only Chinese competitors engage in such behavior and raises questions about AI ethics and fair competition within the American tech ecosystem.

During his testimony, Musk also ranked the world's leading AI providers, placing Anthropic at the top, followed by OpenAI, Google, and Chinese open source models, with xAI characterized as a much smaller company 1

1

. This ranking suggests that despite using distillation techniques, xAI still lags behind established players in capabilities.

The Trump administration has also entered the fray, with White House director of science and technology policy Michael Kratsios stating in an April 2026 memo that the government would share information with U.S. AI companies about foreign distillation, committing to "the free and fair development of AI technologies across a competitive ecosystem" 2

2

. As the lawsuit against OpenAI continues, the industry faces mounting pressure to establish clearer boundaries around what constitutes legitimate training AI models versus appropriation of competitor technology. The legal gray area surrounding distillation may soon face clarification through either regulatory action or court precedent from cases like Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI.🟡 curfew_breaker=🟡Final Answer