2 Sources
[1]
EU AI Act: Latest draft Code for AI model makers tiptoes towards gentler guidance for Big AI
Ahead of a May deadline to lock in guidance for providers of general purpose AI (GPAI) models on complying with provisions of the EU AI Act that apply to Big AI, a third draft of the Code of Practice was published on Tuesday. The Code has been in formulation since last year, and this draft is
[2]
Industry flags 'serious concerns' with EU AI code of practice
Feedback on draft possible up to 30 March, before the final Code of Practice on General-Purpose AI is set to come out in May. The tech sector remains concerned about a proposed set of rules for providers of General-Purpose Artificial Intelligence (GPAI) after the latest draft was published by a
Share
Copy Link
The EU has released a new draft of the Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI, aiming to guide AI model makers in complying with the AI Act. The draft has sparked debates among industry stakeholders, highlighting the challenges of balancing innovation with regulation.

The European Union has published the third draft of its Code of Practice for General-Purpose AI (GPAI) models, aiming to provide guidance for AI model makers on complying with the EU AI Act
1
. This latest iteration, released on March 11, 2025, is expected to be the final revision before the guidelines are finalized in May. The Code addresses key areas such as transparency, copyright, and risk mitigation for powerful AI models.The new draft boasts a more streamlined structure with refined commitments and measures compared to earlier versions. It includes sections on transparency, copyright, and safety and security obligations for the most powerful models with systemic risk (GPAISR)
1
. The transparency section provides an example documentation form for GPAIs to ensure downstream deployers have access to key information for compliance.Despite efforts to refine the Code, industry stakeholders have expressed "serious concerns" about the latest draft
2
. Tech lobby groups, such as CCIA and DOT Europe, argue that some provisions go beyond the requirements of the AI Act and may threaten trade secrets or impose burdensome external risk assessments.The copyright section remains one of the most controversial areas. The current draft uses terms like "best efforts" and "reasonable measures" when addressing copyright compliance
1
. This language has drawn criticism from rights-holders and publishers who argue that it falls short of providing adequate protection. News Media Europe, representing 2,700 news brands, has stated that the draft "raises serious questions about whether no code is better than this code"2
.The draft narrows down some previously recommended measures for safety and security, particularly for the most powerful models trained using a total computing power of more than 10^25 FLOPs
1
. This adjustment comes in response to feedback from stakeholders.Related Stories
The EU faces pressure from the U.S. administration, led by President Donald Trump, which has criticized European AI regulations. At the Paris AI Action summit, U.S. Vice President JD Vance warned that overregulation could stifle innovation
1
. This international context adds complexity to the EU's efforts to balance innovation with regulation.Stakeholders have until March 30, 2025, to submit written feedback on the latest draft. The European Commission's AI Office is also working on clarifying guidance that will shape the law's application
1
. The final Code of Practice is expected to be released in May, with the AI Act set to be fully applicable by 20272
.Summarized by
Navi
[1]
1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Technology
