Major Banks Warn AI Agents Could Trigger Shopping Scams and Fraud Spike

Reviewed byNidhi Govil

18 Sources

Share

Six global banks including Bank of America and Capital One released a principles paper warning that AI agents making purchases could increase scams, fraud, and data-privacy risks. The report highlights concerns about liability, consumer protections, and safety as agentic commerce advances faster than industry standards.

Banks Sound Alarm on AI Shopping Bots

Six major global banks have issued a stark warning about AI agents in e-commerce, cautioning that these automated shopping assistants could trigger a significant increase in shopping scams and fraud.

1

The collaboration between Bank of America, Capital One, NatWest Group, ING Group, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and ASB Bank published a principles paper titled "Building Trust in Agentic Commerce" on Tuesday, detailing multiple risks spanning transparency, safety, data-privacy risks, and consumer protections.

2

3

Source: Gizmodo

Source: Gizmodo

The report comes as technology companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta increasingly promote AI shopping bots as tools that can select products and make purchases on behalf of consumers. British retailer John Lewis reported that searches originating from AI agents had risen to 2.5% from 0.3% a year earlier, with the trend accelerating.

2

However, banks warn the technology is advancing faster than industry standards and consumer protections can keep pace.

Scam and Fraud Risks Escalate with Agentic Commerce

The principles paper highlights that agentic commerce has "potential for higher rates of scams, fraud and disputes" as AI agents making purchases gain greater autonomy.

1

Banks expressed concern that malicious actors may attempt new attack vectors, including compromising or impersonating AI agents and merchants, and engaging in new forms of social engineering.

1

Source: Finextra Research

Source: Finextra Research

The report specifically warns that AI agents could request customers' card details and enter them directly into websites, or steer users towards payment methods that offer weaker payment protections.

2

Financial institutions are particularly concerned about websites that average users might recognize as unsafe, but an AI agent wouldn't spot.

1

Liability Questions Remain Unresolved

A critical concern outlined in the report centers on liability when AI-driven e-commerce goes wrong. Banks question who bears responsibility if an AI agent purchases the wrong item or exceeds its authority. "Consumers are unclear if AI agents will act in their interests," the report states. "They are concerned that AI agents may buy the wrong thing or spend too much - or even worse, lose their money to scams and fraud. They are not sure whether they will be protected or who they will need to go to if things go wrong."

2

5

The financial institutions also voiced concerns for merchants and business owners, as the rise of AI shopping bots could likely lead to an uptick in credit card disputes and chargebacks due to the actions of AI agents.

5

Banks argue that agentic tools need to make themselves known to retailers and payment integrations to help address potential issues.

1

Industry Moves Forward Despite Safety Concerns

Despite these warnings, the financial industry continues developing infrastructure for agentic commerce. Mastercard announced a partnership with startup Alchemy to provide virtual cards for AI agents to use in e-commerce, allowing cardholders to authorize AI agents to independently buy products within specific parameters like price ranges.

4

Mastercard, along with Visa and Ant International, also announced they were working together to develop common standards to verify trusted AI agents in online purchases.

4

Source: PYMNTS

Source: PYMNTS

The timing of the banks' principles paper proved significant, released within 24 hours of the reported discovery of a zero-day vulnerability within Meta's Muse agentic AI assistant.

5

The paper also dropped within hours of Amazon announcing it would block Muse from making purchases on its platform, citing safety and privacy concerns about how Meta's agent failed to identify itself while shopping and how Amazon handles customer credentials.

1

3

Five Principles for Building Trust in Agentic Commerce

The consortium outlined five core principles they want AI companies to follow: transparency, safety, privacy and data protection, choice, and interoperability.

5

The banks plan to discuss a series of proposals with policymakers, including requiring disclosure when an AI agent is involved in a transaction, greater transparency over how AI agents make decisions, and safeguards to protect customer data.

2

Consumers and merchants should remain free to choose which AI-powered e-commerce services they use, while different systems should be interoperable, the report emphasized.

2

The collaboration aims to "establish a framework for a future where AI agents could play a greater role" in product purchasing, with the partnership hoping to encourage other stakeholders, such as AI firms, to join in planning for the future.

1

The consortium is working on a subsequent paper to detail how these principles can actually be implemented to ensure safe deployment of agentic commerce.

3

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved