Meta hit with class action lawsuit over unreleased smart glasses facial recognition system

Meta Sued Over Unreleased Facial Recognition Technology

Meta is confronting a proposed class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on September 4, 2026, over allegations that the company illegally harvested millions of Facebook and Instagram photos to develop facial recognition technology and train AI models1

1

3

3

. The lawsuit centers on NameTag, an unreleased facial recognition system discovered in the code of Meta's smart glasses companion app, which plaintiffs claim was built using biometric information without consent2

2

.

Parents and their children from Illinois and California brought the suit, alleging Meta violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act and California privacy laws by extracting biometric information from photographs uploaded to its platforms without providing proper notice or obtaining permission3

3

4

4

. Justin Boley, a partner at Wexler Boley & Elgersma representing the plaintiffs, stated that "people shouldn't have to worry if their biometric information will be misused simply because their photographs appear on a social media platform"4

4

.

How NameTag Works and Data Harvesting Concerns

Wired previously conducted an independent analysis that uncovered NameTag code embedded within the Meta AI app, revealing the system was designed to convert faces captured by Meta's smart glasses into biometric signatures, or faceprints, and compare them against a database stored on a user's phone1

1

. While this software was present on millions of devices, it was never actually activated1

1

.

The lawsuit alleges that these faceprints could be pulled directly from Facebook and Instagram, citing recently filed Meta patents including one titled "User Identity Verification without Sharing Biometric Data With Platforms"1

1

. This patent describes a system where biometric data captured from hardware like smart glasses can be matched against social media data including profile photos, tagged photos, or videos1

1

. According to the complaint, "Meta had a collection of biometric identifiers and information in the form of faceprints on its servers that it is ready to use for facial recognition via NameTag"2

2

.

AI Training Practices Under Scrutiny

Beyond NameTag, the lawsuit challenges Meta's broader use of user data to train generative AI systems. Plaintiffs allege that Facebook and Instagram photos were used to develop AI models including Emu and Muse Image, with biometric information potentially extracted from people appearing in those photographs without their separate consent3

3

. The Emu model was reportedly trained on Instagram and Facebook data, including pictures and text that plaintiffs say was illegally obtained from users1

1

.

The Muse image model sparked particular backlash when released this summer because Meta planned to allow users to generate AI images of other people if they had a public Instagram account2

2

. The company quickly shelved this feature shortly after announcement due to public outcry2

2

. These allegations raise fundamental questions about how social media images can be repurposed for AI development, particularly when individuals appearing in photographs may not have consented to biometric processing3

3

.

Meta's Response and History with Biometric Data

Meta has firmly rejected the allegations, stating the lawsuit is without merit and misrepresents the company's work. In a statement, Meta emphasized: "We've been transparent about how we use people's information to build and improve our AI products. As for Name Tags, nothing has shipped to consumers and no final decision has been made on what to do here, if anything"2

2

. The company also denied building a universal face database2

2

4

4

.

This isn't Meta's first encounter with legal challenges over facial recognition. In 2020, Facebook agreed to a $650 million settlement after wrongly collecting faceprints from a billion users and storing them on company databases1

1

3

3

. Meta claimed at the time that its terms of service constituted sufficient consent for collection1

1

. More recently, the company paid $1.4 billion to resolve separate biometric data allegations brought by Texas in 20243

3

.

Implications for Privacy Laws and AI Development

The proposed class action could extend across the United States, covering anyone whose images were uploaded to Facebook or Instagram, as well as individuals whose images were submitted to Meta's generative AI systems3

3

. Plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and other legal remedies under data privacy statutes3

3

.

The combination of facial recognition and Meta has historically proven unwelcome, and this skepticism extends to smart glasses technology. Public scrutiny, lawmaker skepticism, and increasingly common bans have made class action lawsuits another cost of doing business for Meta in its endeavor to put cameras on everyone's face1

1

. As Meta expands its AI and smart glasses ambitions, this lawsuit could intensify scrutiny over how photographs, facial information, and other user data are utilized to develop emerging AI technologies3

3

. The case raises critical questions about whether existing consent mechanisms adequately protect users when their social media content is repurposed for biometric analysis and generative AI training, potentially setting precedent for how tech companies must handle user data in AI development going forward.