Mozilla blasts Microsoft Copilot rollback as 'too little, too late' after forcing AI on users

Mozilla calls out Microsoft over Copilot push in Windows

Firefox maker warns old web tactics are now shaping AI at the expense of user choice Firefox-maker Mozilla is calling out Microsoft after Redmond said it would scale back some Copilot features in Windows, arguing the rollback shows the company pushed AI too far without enough regard for user choice. Mozilla VP of global policy Linda Griffin said on Thursday that Microsoft pushing Copilot into every corner of Windows it could find was less of an example of offering a new feature to users, and more about just installing it for them "without user consent." "You should decide whether AI is part of your browsing experience at all. Not Big Tech. Not Mozilla. You," Griffin said of Microsoft's Windows AI maneuvering. You may recall, at the end of March, when Microsoft EVP for Windows and devices Pavan Davuluri suggested that Copilot had spread across Windows with more enthusiasm than discipline. "You will see us be more intentional about how and where Copilot integrates across Windows, focusing on experiences that are genuinely useful and well‑crafted," Davuluri said last month. "As part of this, we are reducing unnecessary Copilot entry points, starting with apps like Snipping Tool, Photos, Widgets and Notepad." It's that move that prompted Mozilla's response, with the company essentially saying that this latest Copilot rollback is too little too late for Windows users. "When Microsoft says it now wants to be 'intentional' about Copilot, they're really admitting that they made repeated choices to serve their business over their customers," Griffin said. "When a company with Microsoft's reach continues to control users -- and only walks it back when the noise gets loud enough -- it shapes what people expect from technology." "What we're seeing right now is a broader transition: Tried and tested tactics are degrading user choice and experiences on the web and now translating to AI," Griffin further explained to The Register in an email. "It's a shift that raises important questions for the industry -- including whether AI will be implemented in ways that reinforce user control, or in ways that reduce it." By that, Griffin is referring to user-frustrating Copilot stories like forcing Edge to auto-launch Copilot whenever a link is clicked from within Outlook, embedding Edge right into Copilot so that default browser preferences are ignored, and force-installing the Copilot app onto users' machines. "The Copilot rollout followed the same playbook we've come to expect from Microsoft: use automatic installs, physical hardware, and default settings to force behaviors," Griffin said in the blog post. We need not detail years of previous examples (Windows 11 hardware reqs, forced OS upgrades, that whole antitrust case over browser defaults, etc.), as El Reg readers are likely aware of Microsoft's history of pushing new features on those who don't want them. Mozilla didn't propose a solution to Microsoft's long-running problem of respecting user preferences in the blog post, only offering that "genuinely useful" AI integrations look nothing like what Microsoft has engaged in. As for what might look appropriate, Mozilla tooted its own horn on this one, referring to the addition of a one-click AI kill switch in Firefox 148 that lets users disable the browser's built-in AI features if they do not want them. "We continue to see ... a growing awareness among users about how AI shows up in their experience -- and increased interest in alternatives that give them more control," Griffin told us. "That's exactly where Firefox is focused." Microsoft didn't respond to questions before publication. ®

Mozilla says Microsoft is using Copilot and Edge to tighten its grip on Windows

Serving tech enthusiasts for over 25 years. TechSpot means tech analysis and advice you can trust. Editor's take: As Microsoft builds Copilot AI deeper into Windows, the move is rekindling debate over how much control any one company should exercise over the computing environment that so many people rely on. For Mozilla, that question has become a renewed challenge to Microsoft's dominance over the desktop and its implications for competition. In a recent statement, Mozilla argued that Microsoft's design choices - particularly those that link the Windows experience tightly to Edge and Copilot - undermine genuine user control. When Microsoft embeds features that favor its own browser and AI tools, it removes opportunities for competing software to be used at all, Mozilla said. At issue is not just how people interact with Microsoft's latest AI layer, but also how deeply the company's software ecosystem shapes user behavior. Changing a default browser in Windows, for instance, remains surprisingly complex. Mozilla points out that even after adjusting multiple settings, key elements of the operating system still open links in Edge, effectively bypassing the user's chosen browser. Examples like Windows Search and Microsoft's productivity apps make that imbalance clear. Taskbar searches can still open in Edge by default, and links clicked in Outlook or Teams can also open in Edge, even when another browser is set as the default. Mozilla contends that these consistent redirects don't just inconvenience users; they distort competition in favor of Microsoft's own stack. Because Windows continues to dominate the PC market, those design decisions have real commercial impact. The more Windows channels users into Edge, the less Firefox is used. For Mozilla, whose revenue comes primarily from search partnerships tied to browser activity, that means fewer searches and less funding to develop new features. It's an economic feedback loop that hits open-source developers harder than platform owners with deeper pockets. Microsoft's Copilot rollout intensified that tension. The AI assistant was not just introduced aggressively; it showed up by default on many machines, pinned to the Windows taskbar, and, on some new laptops, mapped to a dedicated Copilot key. Mozilla argues that planned Copilot hooks in tools like File Explorer and system settings extend Microsoft's ecosystem into areas where browser rivals have little or no reach. From Mozilla's point of view, these moves reveal a pattern: Microsoft embedding its own services so deeply into the OS that alternatives are effectively out of reach. Mozilla warns that if people rely more on built-in AI tools tied to Microsoft's ecosystem, they will spend less time in independent browsers like Firefox. Mozilla frames its approach to AI differently. Mozilla said new AI features in Firefox are opt-in and can be turned off from a central settings panel - tools meant to empower users, not predetermine their experience.

'Going too far without user consent': Mozilla blasts Microsoft's AI creep as user backlash forces Copilot to be scaled back

* Mozilla has criticized Microsoft's Copilot practices * Microsoft has faced complaints over forcing its AI onto users * It's now decided to scale back Copilot in its apps If you're a long-time Windows user, you might have noticed Microsoft's not-so-subtle attempts to shoehorn its Copilot artificial intelligence (AI) into pretty much every app possible on your PC. Copilot in Notepad? Check. In Widgets? You bet. In the Snipping Tool? Of course. But all that unreasonable AI-ification has led to repeated user backlash, and it seems that Microsoft has finally cottoned on by scaling back machine learning features in a selection of its own apps. And for Firefox maker Mozilla, that move is long overdue. Writing on the company's official blog, Linda Griffin, Mozilla's Vice President of Global Policy, said that "Rolling back these forced AI integrations is the right move, but this is just the most recent example of Microsoft going too far without user consent." Griffin characterized Microsoft's Copilot expansion as forceful and done "with no prompt and no consent," noting that users were not asked if they wanted their apps to be outfitted with AI features. And Griffin was blunt about Microsoft's motivations, saying that "When Microsoft says it now wants to be 'intentional' about Copilot, they're really admitting that they made repeated choices to serve their business over their customers." 'Deceptive' moves Griffin argued that embedding AI inside its apps was part of a "pattern of deceptive design patterns" from Microsoft. Research commissioned by Mozilla has found that "Microsoft uses design and distribution tactics to override user choice," such as the Windows search bar opening Edge and not your web browser of choice, the lack of a device migration system in Microsoft's operating system, and the convoluted path users must take if they want to select a new default browser. In contrast, Mozilla says it's doing things differently. Its own built-in browser AI can be disabled using a single kill switch, something that was implemented after vocal user feedback. Griffin says this is part of Mozilla's way of thinking regarding AI: "You should decide whether AI is part of your browsing experience at all. Not Big Tech. Not Mozilla. You." Griffin also contrasted Mozilla's approach against Microsoft's in another way, saying: "And critically, your preferences also persist across browser updates, which means AI tools won't silently re-enable themselves after a major upgrade. No reinstalling. No opting out again after the fact." There's no doubt that Microsoft has come in for plenty of criticism over the aggressive way it has rolled out Copilot across its apps, and its hand has been forced by users in other areas too. With the company deciding to change course after facing strong complaints, it's hard not to agree with much of what Mozilla's Griffin has said. Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button! And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

Mozilla says 'Microsoft goes too far' with Copilot, right before reassuring that you can turn off Firefox's 'AI enhancements'

Misclicking the Copilot button before hurrying to shut down Windows' built-in AI has become a familiar ritual for many recent Microsoft customers. At one point, it seemed like the company wanted to crowbar AI into all of its offerings, though it recently announced it would pull back on this approach. Even so, Mozilla has shared a few choice words about Microsoft's AI-implementation. Microsoft says it plans to roll back AI features and improve performance, but Mozilla alleges, "This is just the most recent example of Microsoft going too far without user consent." In a recent blog post, the company behind Firefox criticised Microsoft's auto-installing of the M365 Copilot app, and the introduction of the aforementioned physical, not easy to remap Copilot key. The post also levels criticism at what is described as Microsoft's "pattern of deceptive design patterns," particularly with regards to its distribution tactics for the Edge browser. Mozilla highlights "deliberately complicated processes for changing your default browser, to UI that routes users back to Microsoft's Edge browser even after they've explicitly chosen something else." You may remember that this alleged behaviour from Microsoft was also the subject of an antitrust complaint made by browser rival Opera back in February. But Mozilla's criticisms are immediately followed by it touting its own browser for giving users direct control over its AI features, thanks to the AI Controls panel introduced in Firefox 148. This includes a 'Block AI Enhancements' switch that I wouldn't mind also seeing in Microsoft's Edge -- or Google Chrome and G Suite apps for that matter. The company also says that Firefox will remember your preferences, so that the 'block AI enhancements' button won't magically unclick itself between browser updates. But even with the valid criticism of Microsoft's recent tactics, and a strong conclusion about wanting to build an internet that makes users feel "like they're in control of their own devices and their own data," it all rings just a little hollow to me. Mozilla attempts to lay cards on the table, positioning itself as a company that only wants to pursue "genuinely useful" AI features. However, incorporating AI when the internet has previously made its displeasure known, and after the company has previously stated it's "heard from many who want nothing to do with AI," makes me wonder: Is Mozilla really rebelling with its approach, or just following along with the rest of big tech at a slightly different pace?