3 Sources
3 Sources
[1]
The 'Anti-Grammarly' Helps People Hide Their Participation in the AI Slop Era
Now that the human race has developed a tool that lets everyone write emails that sound like a pitch deck written by Bryce, who everyone knows is the worst person in the office, the next great leap forward is a tool that makes those emails sound like... let's say Jill, the normal person in the office with whom no one has a problem. How? By introducing human-style mistakes into the text! Are you a secret ChatGPT or Grammarly user concerned that your emails read like AI slop because they are AI slop? That’s not a problem. It’s an opportunity. It’s a chance to use another AI tool, a tool that exists right now. Using this app underscores the importance of credibility, trustworthiness and integrity. It could be said that these new tools are quietly revolutionizing writing. Meet “Sinceerly,†which has missed at least two opportunities by not naming itself either “Sinceer.ly†or “[sic].†The app promises to expunge the telltale signs of AI composition from your emails: “Kill the emdash! [sic] No more 'not justâ€|'! Add some typos!†I fed Sinceerly the second paragraph of this post, which you might notice intentionally contains multiple AI writing tropes that I crafted the old-fashioned way. The app has three settings, which are “Subtle,†“Human,†and “CEO†(appreciate the distinction between Human and CEO). And Sinceerly's efforts at rewriting my ghastly paragraph went as follows: Subtle: “Are you a secret ChatGPT user concerned that your emials read as AI slop? Here's the thing. That's not just a problem, it's also an opportunity. It's a chance to use another AI tool, and you know what? That tool exists right now. It's a tool that shows the importance of credibility, trustworthiness, and integrity. You could say the app is quietly changing how people write.†Human: “Are you a sceret ChatGPT user worried your emails sound like AI? Yeah, that's a problem. But it's also an opening. You can use another AI tool, and guess what? It's already here. It's a tool about credibility, trustworthiness and integrity. The app is changing how people write.†CEO: “writing an email that doesn't sound like AI slop isn't just a problemâ€"it's an opportunity. there's a tool for it, available now. it prioritizes credibility, trustworthiness, and integrity. the app is reshaping how people write.†This is interesting. There are some nice touches: the CEO’s disdain for initial capitals and their professionally clipped delivery, the typos, etc. But I don’t know that anyone would mistake any of these for human-written copy now that we've become accustomed to the tropes contained therein. In fairness, I can’t imagine any LLM these days turns out prose quite as obnoxious as the example I provided, but I’m surprised some of the most prominent AI shibbolethsâ€"“It’s not [x]. It’s [y]†and the rule of three formulation involving three words that are largely synonymousâ€"remained unscathed. The real question, though, is whether this whole thing is, y’know, serious. I had some trouble getting the app to work, and eventually reached out to its developer, Dan Horwitz, a genial MBA student at Harvard. I put the same question to him, pointing out that while my initial assumption was that the app was going to be rather tongue-in-cheek, the website seems very serious about the idea. Horwitz laughs. “No,†he reassures me, “It is tongue-in-cheek.†The website is awfully deadpan, then. “Yeah,†he says. “The whole thing is meant to make people think twice and have a little fun. It’s closer to satire.†Of course, some of the best satire falls into the category of things that make you do a double-take and ask, wait, is this real? On that note, Sinceerly is a successâ€"but don’t be surprised if you see people using it for real. An AI correcting the mistakes of another AI to generate an email that’ll be read by another AI? It’s LLMs all the way down, kids.
[2]
I never thought AI would add typos - but it kind of makes sense
"Anti-Grammarly" tool uses AI to make writing imperfect on purpose A new AI tool is flipping one of the oldest rules of digital communication on its head: perfect grammar is no longer the goal. Instead, the latest trend is to make emails look deliberately human - even if that means adding typos. When AI Starts Making You Sound Less Perfect According to a report by Fast Company, a new "anti-Grammarly" style tool created by Ben Horwitz has emerged that intentionally inserts mistakes into emails, making them appear less polished and more human. Horwitz is an investment partner at a venture capital firm called Dorm Room, and he comes from the Harvard Business School. The idea sounds counterintuitive at first. Tools like Grammarly were built to eliminate errors and improve clarity. But in the age of generative AI, flawless writing has started to carry a different implication - it often signals that a machine may have written it. Recommended Videos That shift has created a strange new dynamic. Instead of striving for perfection, users are now trying to simulate imperfection to maintain authenticity. Some tools even allow users to control the level of "human-ness," from subtle typos to more casual, informal writing styles. In other words, AI is now being used to hide the fact that AI was used in the first place. Why This Signals A Larger Change In Communication This trend reflects a deeper shift in how digital communication is perceived. For decades, clean grammar and structured writing were markers of professionalism. Now, that same polish can feel artificial. Recent discussions suggest that typos and informal writing are increasingly seen as signs of authenticity, even status. In some cases, overly perfect emails may be viewed with suspicion, as if they lack a human touch. That inversion is significant. It suggests that AI isn't just changing how we write - it's changing what "good writing" even means. The irony is hard to miss. We built AI tools to improve communication, and now we're building new ones to undo those improvements. Why It Matters To You As A User For everyday users, this shift could subtly change how emails are written and interpreted. If perfect grammar increasingly signals automation, you may find yourself adjusting your tone - intentionally or not - to appear more genuine. That could mean shorter sentences, casual phrasing, or even minor errors creeping into professional communication. At the same time, it raises questions about trust. If both polished and imperfect writing can be generated by AI, distinguishing between human and machine becomes even more difficult. What Comes Next In The AI Writing Evolution This "anti-perfection" trend is likely just the beginning. As AI writing tools become more advanced, the focus will shift from correctness to believability. Future tools may not just generate text, but adapt tone, style, and even mistakes based on context and audience. The goal will be to make communication feel natural, not flawless. That evolution could blur the line between human and machine even further. And perhaps that's the real takeaway. The future of writing isn't about eliminating errors - it's about deciding which ones to keep.
[3]
This 'anti-Grammarly' AI tool adds typos to your emails on purpose
From signing my emails with "bet" instead of "best" or sometimes writing "felt" instead of "left", living with dyslexia and choosing a career that requires me to write on the daily has turned typos into my biggest nightmare. After all, I've been taught that typos signal carelessness, unprofessionalism, or worse -- lack of talent altogether. But as AI makes life seemingly more perfect, tiny errors are also signatures of our humanity -- and that we put actual care into what we wrote instead of mindlessly relying on an LLM.
Share
Share
Copy Link
A new AI tool called Sinceerly is flipping digital communication rules by intentionally adding typos and imperfections to emails. Created as satire by Harvard MBA student Dan Horwitz, the anti-Grammarly tool addresses a growing concern: flawless writing now signals AI use rather than professionalism, prompting users to simulate human authenticity through deliberate mistakes.
A new AI tool is challenging decades of digital communication norms by intentionally introducing errors into perfectly polished text. Sinceerly, created by Dan Horwitz, a Harvard MBA student, functions as an anti-Grammarly solution designed to make AI-generated text appear more human
1
. The tool promises to eliminate telltale signs of AI composition by killing em-dashes, removing overused phrases like "not just," and strategically adding typos on purpose1
.
Source: Gizmodo
Sinceerly offers three distinct settings: "Subtle," "Human," and "CEO," each calibrated to inject different levels of imperfection into text
1
. The CEO setting, notably, reflects a disdain for initial capitals and delivers professionally clipped prose, while the Human setting introduces more casual phrasing and deliberate misspellings like "sceret" instead of "secret"1
.While Sinceerly's website presents the concept with deadpan seriousness, Horwitz confirmed the tool is fundamentally tongue-in-cheek, closer to satire than a genuine productivity solution
1
. "The whole thing is meant to make people think twice and have a little fun," Horwitz explained1
. Yet the satire touches on a genuine shift in how flawless writing is perceived in the age of ChatGPT and other LLM platforms.The irony runs deep: tools like Grammarly were built to eliminate errors and improve clarity, but now that same polish carries different implications
2
. According to Fast Company, Horwitz is an investment partner at venture capital firm Dorm Room and comes from Harvard Business School2
. His creation highlights how AI slop—the generic, overly polished output from language models—has become instantly recognizable through AI writing tropes like repetitive phrase structures and synonym-heavy formulations1
.This trend reflects a fundamental inversion in digital communication standards. For decades, clean grammar and structured writing served as markers of professionalism. Now that same perfection can feel artificial, lacking the human touch that distinguishes genuine correspondence from automated responses
2
. Typos and informal writing increasingly function as signs of human authenticity, even status, while overly perfect emails may trigger suspicion2
.
Source: Fast Company
As one writer with dyslexia noted, tiny errors have become "signatures of our humanity" that signal actual care rather than mindless reliance on an LLM
3
. This shift matters because it changes what "good writing" even means2
. The scenario creates a strange dynamic where users simulate imperfection to maintain believability—essentially using AI to hide the fact that AI was used in the first place2
.Related Stories
The emergence of anti-Grammarly tools raises critical questions about trust in digital communication. If both polished and imperfect writing can be generated by AI, distinguishing between human and machine becomes increasingly difficult
2
. Everyday users may find themselves adjusting tone—intentionally or not—to appear more genuine, incorporating shorter sentences, casual phrasing, or minor errors into professional emails2
.Looking ahead, this anti-perfection trend likely represents just the beginning of a broader evolution. As AI writing tools advance, the focus will shift from correctness to believability, with future tools adapting tone, style, and strategic mistakes based on context and audience
2
. The goal will center on making communication feel natural rather than flawless, potentially blurring the line between human and machine even further. As one observer noted, the scenario creates an absurd feedback loop: "An AI correcting the mistakes of another AI to generate an email that'll be read by another AI? It's LLMs all the way down"1
.Summarized by
Navi
[2]
18 Aug 2025•Technology

17 Mar 2026•Entertainment and Society

12 Mar 2026•Policy and Regulation

1
Technology

2
Science and Research

3
Technology
