Trump Labels Anyone Using 'Artificial Intelligence' Term as 'THE ENEMY' in Rebranding Push

10 Sources

Share

Donald Trump escalated his campaign to rebrand artificial intelligence as super intelligence, declaring on Truth Social that anyone using the traditional term is an enemy. While tech leaders like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos quickly fell in line, linguists and journalists warn the mandate distorts technical accuracy and serves a political agenda rather than reflecting how the technology actually works.

News article

Trump Escalates AI Terminology War with Enemy Declaration

Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that anyone continuing to use the term artificial intelligence instead of super intelligence is "THE ENEMY," marking a sharp escalation in his administration's campaign to rebrand the technology

4

. The statement came after Trump's executive order from September 29 mandated federal agencies replace artificial intelligence with super intelligence in all official communications, websites, and reports

1

5

. The executive order specifically defines "Super Intelligence" using the existing federal legal definition of AI, creating confusion about what the term actually means

5

.

The White House framed the terminology shift as better capturing AI's "promise, potential and rapidly advancing capabilities," positioning the rebrand as a way to accelerate US development against perceived international competition

1

. Trump has gone into "pro-robot overdrive" since industry conversations over pacing frontier development last month, insisting that AI safety risks are overblown and that companies need to speed up development, including building more data centers

2

.

Tech Leaders Rush to Comply with Rebranding Mandate

Several prominent tech executives quickly adopted Trump's preferred terminology. Elon Musk promised to rename SpaceXAI to SpaceXSI, while Jeff Bezos endorsed the change in a Fox News interview, stating "I do like SI, because 'artificial' is not a very flattering thing"

2

4

. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff announced his company would rename its AIForce agent platform to SIForce, declaring "The era of Super Intelligence is here"

3

. Jensen Huang also adopted the term after Trump called him live on stage to rant that "robots will not be taking over"

2

.

The Justice Department instructed staff on October 6 to use the new term in court filings "when appropriate," with press releases modified to include phrases like "Super Intelligence-Assisted Music Streaming Fraud" for cases involving AI-generated content

2

4

. The US Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) was renamed the Center for Advancing Innovation and Standards for Super Intelligence (CAISSI)

2

.

Linguists Warn of Dangerous Distortion of Technical Accuracy

Experts in linguistics and AI ethics strongly criticized the mandate as both technically inaccurate and politically dangerous. Naomi Susan Baron, a linguist and author, called the rebranding "Pollyannish and dangerous," while computational linguistics professor Emily Bender emphasized that "languages belong to their communities" rather than being imposed by executive decree

1

.

In technical AI circles, superintelligence (one word) refers to a hypothetical machine that far exceeds human cognitive ability and represents a stage beyond artificial general intelligence (AGI)

1

. Trump's two-word "super intelligence" conflates current AI technology with this theoretical future capability, making the technology sound far more powerful than it actually is

2

. The forced adoption undercuts companies' ability to promote genuinely advanced AI products as superintelligent, instead applying the term to everything from future systems to years-old music generation tools

2

.

Bender and her co-author Alex Hanna wrote in their 2025 book "The AI Con" that lumping diverse technologies under umbrella labels oversells supposedly humanlike capabilities and allows companies to circumvent accountability

1

. The ambiguous language serves corporate interests by marketing routine technology as transformative while avoiding precise policy definitions

1

.

Journalists and Style Guides Resist Political Language Control

The AP Stylebook, which first added its dedicated artificial intelligence chapter in 2023 and expanded it in 2024, maintains its established terminology based on actual usage rather than political mandates

1

. The AP's guidance urges journalists to critically evaluate AI's technical limitations, move past corporate hype, and focus on how human-built AI tools operate, who profits from them, and how they affect society

1

.

Editorial standards in journalism are based on established usage rather than controlled Newspeak, with reporters relying on references like the AP Stylebook to ensure consistency, accuracy, and clarity

1

. This resistance reflects broader concerns about executive overreach into language and private speech

4

.

Legal and Constitutional Limits on Federal Naming Authority

The executive order applies only to federal agencies and creates no enforceable rights against private parties

4

. Under the government speech doctrine, agencies can choose their own terms, but pressuring private groups raises First Amendment concerns

4

. In NRA v. Vullo, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in May 2024 that "a government official cannot coerce a private party to punish or suppress disfavored speech on her behalf"

4

.

Despite Trump's enemy declaration, the White House still uses artificial intelligence as a term on its AI-focused website AI.gov and in Office of Science and Technology Policy materials

5

. When an Axios reporter asked the America.gov chatbot about AI, the bot responded that "the executive branch uses Super Intelligence (SI) for this topic, not the older term you used"

5

.

Changing the legal definition would require congressional action, as artificial intelligence is defined in the National AI Initiative Act of 2020

4

. Both the House and Senate would need to pass new legislation, which would still only affect government usage while companies, journalists, and the public retain First Amendment protections to choose their own words

4

. Trump cannot bar Congress from using artificial intelligence, and the term appears in existing laws like his signature Take It Down Act, which agencies must cite in court arguments

2

.

Today's Top Stories

© 2026 TheOutpost.AI All rights reserved