3 Sources
[1]
China's 360 says it has developed tools to match Anthropic's Mythos
BEIJING, June 24 (Reuters) - Chinese cybersecurity firm 360 Security Technology (601360.SS), opens new tab has developed what it calls a domestic answer to Anthropic's Mythos, it said on Wednesday, casting the U.S. model as a strategic cyber capability that China could not afford to lack. Mythos, previewed in April, is a system that detects software vulnerabilities, but cybersecurity experts have warned that it could supercharge cyberattacks. The U.S. this month ordered Anthropic to suspend exports of a less powerful version of the programme, citing national security concerns. Speaking at the ISC.AI 2026 cybersecurity conference in Beijing, 360 founder Zhou Hongyi unveiled two AI security tools under the banner "Yitian Tulong", a name drawn from a classic Chinese martial arts novel meaning "Heavenly Sword and Dragon Saber". Zhou said one tool, "Tulongfeng", was designed to automatically discover software vulnerabilities, calling it "China's version of Mythos", while a second system, "Yitianzhen", was built to automate cyber defence and incident response. "This kind of powerful weapon that can change the landscape of cyber offence and defence cannot be held only by others," Zhou said in a speech, according to a transcript published by 360. He described vulnerability-finding AI as a national strategic asset that could be used both to defend critical infrastructure and to gain offensive advantage. CYBERATTACKS China and the U.S. have a long history of accusing each other of conducting offensive cyber operations on critical infrastructure. 360's release marks the most high-profile Chinese answer yet to Anthropic's Mythos model, which has triggered alarm in Washington and other capitals, as well as across the cybersecurity industry, over its ability to discover vulnerabilities in sensitive systems. Anthropic said in April that Mythos Preview had found "thousands" of major vulnerabilities in operating systems, web browsers and other software. The U.S. government has ordered the company to suspend exports of a less powerful version of Mythos to destinations worldwide and all foreign nationals due to national security concerns. Zhou argued that China faced a risk of "one-way transparency" if U.S. entities could use Mythos-like models to scan software and critical systems while Chinese companies were denied comparable capabilities. His remarks reflect widespread unease in China at what the country's state media has called the "unprecedented cyberattack capabilities" displayed by Mythos. Zhou is a member of China's top political advisory body. 360 said Tulongfeng had found 3,432 software vulnerabilities, including 105 confirmed by Chinese authorities. Reuters could not independently verify the claims. Zhou said 360 would not simply copy the U.S. approach, which he described as relying on "the strongest model, the strongest computing power and the strongest chips". U.S. EXPORT CONTROLS Tightening U.S. export controls on China's access to cutting-edge U.S. chips since 2022 have prevented domestic models from catching up to American rivals including Anthropic, though the gap has narrowed since last year. The U.S. has justified these restrictions by arguing these chips would allow the Chinese military to turbocharge its capabilities with AI. "Objectively speaking, domestic models still have a 20%-30% gap in base capability," Zhou said. "China cannot wait until model capabilities have fully caught up before starting vulnerability discovery, because we cannot afford to wait." Instead, Zhou said his company was taking an "agent" route, combining models with security expertise, vulnerability databases and automated tools, an approach he claimed only 360 had successfully deployed, giving Tulongfeng "Mythos-equivalent capabilities". "If Mythos is a top-end chip, what we are building is a complete machine that can run stably, work 24 hours a day and make fewer mistakes," he said. "If the U.S. route is to cultivate a genius hacker, 360's route is to organise a professional attack-and-defence team." Last year, Anthropic said that hackers exploited vulnerabilities in its Claude AI to attack around 30 global organizations. Moreover, 67% of the 1,000 executives surveyed in an IBM and Palo Alto Networks study said they had been targeted by AI attacks within the past year. Zhou, a veteran Chinese internet entrepreneur and outspoken technology commentator, founded 360, which became one of China's best-known cybersecurity companies through antivirus software and later expanded into enterprise and government security. Reporting by Eduardo Baptista; Editing by Jan Harvey Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab * Suggested Topics: * Disrupted * Intellectual Property Eduardo Baptista Thomson Reuters Eduardo Baptista is a Senior Correspondent for Reuters based in Beijing, covering China's technology, space, and automotive industries. He has led enterprise and investigative reporting on China's military-linked companies, artificial intelligence and semiconductor supply chains, as well as macroeconomic and industrial policy. Baptista has reported from China for nearly a decade and holds a BA in History from the University of Cambridge.
[2]
China cybersecurity firm 360 Security Technology claims to have developed tools to match Anthropic's Mythos
Anthropic Mythos, previewed in April, is a system that detects software vulnerabilities, but cybersecurity experts have warned that it could supercharge cyberattacks. Chinese cybersecurity firm 360 Security Technology has developed what it calls a domestic answer to Anthropic's Mythos, it said on Wednesday, casting the U.S. model as a strategic cyber capability that China could not afford to lack. Mythos, previewed in April, is a system that detects software vulnerabilities, but cybersecurity experts have warned that it could supercharge cyberattacks. The U.S. this month ordered Anthropic to suspend exports of a less powerful version of the programme, citing national security concerns. Speaking at the ISC. AI 2026 cybersecurity conference in Beijing, 360 founder Zhou Hongyi unveiled two AI security tools under the banner "Yitian Tulong", a name drawn from a classic Chinese martial arts novel meaning "Heavenly Sword and Dragon Saber". Zhou said one tool, "Tulongfeng", was designed to automatically discover software vulnerabilities, calling it "China's version of Mythos", while a second system, "Yitianzhen", was built to automate cyber defence and incident response. "This kind of powerful weapon that can change the landscape of cyber offence and defence cannot be held only by others," Zhou said in a speech, according to a transcript published by 360. He described vulnerability-finding AI as a national strategic asset that could be used both to defend critical infrastructure and to gain offensive advantage. Cyberattacks - U. S and China China and the U.S. have a long history of accusing each other of conducting offensive cyber operations on critical infrastructure. 360's release marks the most high-profile Chinese answer yet to Anthropic's Mythos model, which has triggered alarm in Washington and other capitals, as well as across the cybersecurity industry, over its ability to discover vulnerabilities in sensitive systems. Anthropic said in April that Mythos Preview had found "thousands" of major vulnerabilities in operating systems, web browsers and other software, Reuters reported. The U.S. government has ordered the company to suspend exports of a less powerful version of Mythos to destinations worldwide and all foreign nationals due to national security concerns. Zhou argued that China faced a risk of "one-way transparency" if U.S. entities could use Mythos-like models to scan software and critical systems while Chinese companies were denied comparable capabilities. His remarks reflect widespread unease in China at what the country's state media has called the "unprecedented cyberattack capabilities" displayed by Mythos. Zhou is a member of China's top political advisory body. 360 said Tulongfeng had found 3,432 software vulnerabilities, including 105 confirmed by Chinese authorities. Reuters could not independently verify the claims. Zhou said 360 would not simply copy the U.S. approach, which he described as relying on "the strongest model, the strongest computing power and the strongest chips". U.S. Export Controls Tightening U.S. export controls on China's access to cutting-edge U.S. chips since 2022 have prevented domestic models from catching up to American rivals including Anthropic, though the gap has narrowed since last year. The U.S. has justified these restrictions by arguing these chips would allow the Chinese military to turbocharge its capabilities with AI. "Objectively speaking, domestic models still have a 20%-30% gap in base capability," Zhou said. "China cannot wait until model capabilities have fully caught up before starting vulnerability discovery, because we cannot afford to wait." Instead, Zhou said his company was taking an "agent" route, combining models with security expertise, vulnerability databases and automated tools, an approach he claimed only 360 had successfully deployed, giving Tulongfeng "Mythos-equivalent capabilities". "If Mythos is a top-end chip, what we are building is a complete machine that can run stably, work 24 hours a day and make fewer mistakes," he said. "If the U.S. route is to cultivate a genius hacker, 360's route is to organise a professional attack-and-defence team." Last year, Anthropic said that hackers exploited vulnerabilities in its Claude AI to attack around 30 global organizations. Moreover, 67% of the 1,000 executives surveyed in an IBM and Palo Alto Networks study said they had been targeted by AI attacks within the past year. Zhou, a veteran Chinese internet entrepreneur and outspoken technology commentator, founded 360, which became one of China's best-known cybersecurity companies through antivirus software and later expanded into enterprise and government security.
[3]
China's 360 says it has developed tools to match Anthropic's Mythos
BEIJING, June 24 (Reuters) - Chinese cybersecurity firm 360 Security Technology has developed what it calls a domestic answer to Anthropic's Mythos, it said on Wednesday, casting the U.S. model as a strategic cyber capability that China could not afford to lack. Mythos, previewed in April, is a system that detects software vulnerabilities, but cybersecurity experts have warned that it could supercharge cyberattacks. The U.S. this month ordered Anthropic to suspend exports of a less powerful version of the programme, citing national security concerns. Speaking at the ISC.AI 2026 cybersecurity conference in Beijing, 360 founder Zhou Hongyi unveiled two AI security tools under the banner "Yitian Tulong", a name drawn from a classic Chinese martial arts novel meaning "Heavenly Sword and Dragon Saber". Zhou said one tool, "Tulongfeng", was designed to automatically discover software vulnerabilities, calling it "China's version of Mythos", while a second system, "Yitianzhen", was built to automate cyber defence and incident response. "This kind of powerful weapon that can change the landscape of cyber offence and defence cannot be held only by others," Zhou said in a speech, according to a transcript published by 360. He described vulnerability-finding AI as a national strategic asset that could be used both to defend critical infrastructure and to gain offensive advantage. CYBERATTACKS China and the U.S. have a long history of accusing each other of conducting offensive cyber operations on critical infrastructure. 360's release marks the most high-profile Chinese answer yet to Anthropic's Mythos model, which has triggered alarm in Washington and other capitals, as well as across the cybersecurity industry, over its ability to discover vulnerabilities in sensitive systems. Anthropic said in April that Mythos Preview had found "thousands" of major vulnerabilities in operating systems, web browsers and other software. The U.S. government has ordered the company to suspend exports of a less powerful version of Mythos to destinations worldwide and all foreign nationals due to national security concerns. Zhou argued that China faced a risk of "one-way transparency" if U.S. entities could use Mythos-like models to scan software and critical systems while Chinese companies were denied comparable capabilities. His remarks reflect widespread unease in China at what the country's state media has called the "unprecedented cyberattack capabilities" displayed by Mythos. Zhou is a member of China's top political advisory body. 360 said Tulongfeng had found 3,432 software vulnerabilities, including 105 confirmed by Chinese authorities. Reuters could not independently verify the claims. Zhou said 360 would not simply copy the U.S. approach, which he described as relying on "the strongest model, the strongest computing power and the strongest chips". U.S. EXPORT CONTROLS Tightening U.S. export controls on China's access to cutting-edge U.S. chips since 2022 have prevented domestic models from catching up to American rivals including Anthropic, though the gap has narrowed since last year. The U.S. has justified these restrictions by arguing these chips would allow the Chinese military to turbocharge its capabilities with AI. "Objectively speaking, domestic models still have a 20%-30% gap in base capability," Zhou said. "China cannot wait until model capabilities have fully caught up before starting vulnerability discovery, because we cannot afford to wait." Instead, Zhou said his company was taking an "agent" route, combining models with security expertise, vulnerability databases and automated tools, an approach he claimed only 360 had successfully deployed, giving Tulongfeng "Mythos-equivalent capabilities". "If Mythos is a top-end chip, what we are building is a complete machine that can run stably, work 24 hours a day and make fewer mistakes," he said. "If the U.S. route is to cultivate a genius hacker, 360's route is to organise a professional attack-and-defence team." Last year, Anthropic said that hackers exploited vulnerabilities in its Claude AI to attack around 30 global organizations. Moreover, 67% of the 1,000 executives surveyed in an IBM and Palo Alto Networks study said they had been targeted by AI attacks within the past year. Zhou, a veteran Chinese internet entrepreneur and outspoken technology commentator, founded 360, which became one of China's best-known cybersecurity companies through antivirus software and later expanded into enterprise and government security. (Reporting by Eduardo Baptista; Editing by Jan Harvey)
Share
Copy Link
Chinese cybersecurity firm 360 Security Technology unveiled two AI security tools designed to match Anthropic's Mythos, which detects software vulnerabilities. The announcement at Beijing's ISC.AI 2026 conference signals China's determination to develop domestic AI-driven cybersecurity tools despite a 20-30% capability gap with U.S. models and tightening export controls on advanced chips.

Chinese cybersecurity firm 360 Security Technology has launched what it describes as China's response to U.S. AI dominance in vulnerability detection, unveiling two AI cybersecurity tools at the ISC.AI 2026 conference in Beijing. Company founder Zhou Hongyi introduced the systems under the banner "Yitian Tulong"—a reference to a classic Chinese martial arts novel meaning "Heavenly Sword and Dragon Saber"—positioning them as national strategic assets that China cannot afford to lack
1
. The first tool, Tulongfeng, focuses on automated vulnerability discovery and is being called "China's version of Mythos," while the second system, Yitianzhen, handles automated cyber defense and incident response2
.The announcement marks the most high-profile Chinese answer yet to Anthropic's Mythos, which previewed in April as a system that detects software vulnerabilities but has triggered alarm across Washington and the cybersecurity industry over its potential to supercharge cyberattacks. Anthropic reported that Mythos Preview had found "thousands" of major vulnerabilities in operating systems, web browsers and other software
3
. The U.S. government this month ordered Anthropic to suspend exports of a less powerful version of Mythos to destinations worldwide due to national security concerns, a move that has fueled geopolitical tensions and intensified the AI arms race in cybersecurity1
.Zhou Hongyi acknowledged that domestic models still face a 20-30% gap in base capability compared to American rivals, largely due to U.S. export controls on cutting-edge chips implemented since 2022. Rather than waiting to close this gap, 360 Security Technology is taking what Zhou calls an "agent" route, combining AI models with security expertise, vulnerability databases and automated tools
2
. "If Mythos is a top-end chip, what we are building is a complete machine that can run stably, work 24 hours a day and make fewer mistakes," Zhou explained. "If the U.S. route is to cultivate a genius hacker, 360's route is to organise a professional attack-and-defence team." The company claims Tulongfeng has already identified 3,432 software vulnerabilities, including 105 confirmed by Chinese authorities, though Reuters could not independently verify these claims1
.Related Stories
Zhou, a member of China's top political advisory body and veteran internet entrepreneur, argued that China faces a risk of "one-way transparency" if U.S. entities can use Mythos-like models to scan software and critical systems while Chinese companies are denied comparable capabilities through U.S. export controls on Mythos
3
. This vulnerability-finding AI is being framed as essential for both defending critical infrastructure and gaining offensive advantage in what both nations describe as offensive cyber operations on each other's systems. The development comes as AI-driven cybersecurity tools become increasingly sophisticated, with 67% of 1,000 executives surveyed in an IBM and Palo Alto Networks study reporting they had been targeted by AI attacks within the past year2
. As both nations continue developing these capabilities, the global cybersecurity landscape faces a future where AI-powered tools could fundamentally alter the balance of cyber offense and defense, raising questions about how organizations worldwide will protect themselves in an environment where vulnerabilities can be discovered and potentially exploited at machine speed.Summarized by
Navi
[3]
19 Jun 2026•Policy and Regulation

14 May 2026•Technology

14 Apr 2026•Technology

1
Policy and Regulation

2
Policy and Regulation

3
Policy and Regulation
