2 Sources
[1]
AI reveals hidden language patterns and likely authorship in the Bible
AI is transforming every industry, from medicine to film to finance. So, why not use it to study one of the world's most revered ancient texts, the Bible? An international team of researchers, including Shira Faigenbaum-Golovin, assistant research professor of Mathematics at Duke University, combined artificial intelligence, statistical modeling and linguistic analysis to address one of the most enduring questions in biblical studies: the identification of its authors. The study is published in the journal PLOS One. By analyzing subtle variations in word usage across texts, the team was able to distinguish between three distinct scribal traditions (writing styles) spanning the first nine books of the Hebrew Bible, known as the Enneateuch. Using the same AI-based statistical model, the team was then able to determine the most likely authorship of other Bible chapters. Even better, the model also explained how it reached its conclusions. But how did the mathematician get here? In 2010, Faigenbaum-Golovin began collaborating with Israel Finkelstein, head of the School of Archaeology and Maritime Cultures at the University of Haifa, using mathematical and statistical tools to determine the authorship of lettering found on pottery fragments from 600 B.C. by comparing the style and shape of the letters inscribed on each fragment. Their discoveries were featured on the front page of The New York Times. "We concluded that the findings in those inscriptions could offer valuable clues for dating texts from the Old Testament," Faigenbaum-Golovin said. "That's when we started putting together our current team, who could help us analyze these biblical texts." The multidisciplinary undertaking was made up of two parts. First, Faigenbaum-Golovin and Finkelstein's team -- Alon Kipnis (Reichman University), Axel Bühler (Protestant Faculty of Theology of Paris), Eli Piasetzky (Tel Aviv University) and Thomas Römer (Collège de France) -- was made up of archaeologists, biblical scholars, physicists, mathematicians and computer scientists. The team used a novel AI-based statistical model to analyze language patterns in three major sections of the Bible. They studied the Bible's first five books: Deuteronomy, the so-called Deuteronomistic History from Joshua to Kings, and the priestly writings in the Torah. Results showed Deuteronomy and the historical books were more similar to each other than to the priestly texts, which is already the consensus among biblical scholars. "We found that each group of authors has a different style -- surprisingly, even regarding simple and common words such as 'no,' 'which,' or 'king.' Our method accurately identifies these differences," said Römer. To test the model, the team selected 50 chapters from the first nine books of the Bible, each of which has already been allocated by biblical scholars to one of the writing styles mentioned above. "The model compared the chapters and proposed a quantitative formula for allocating each chapter to one of the three writing styles," said Faigenbaum-Golovin. In the second part of the study, the team applied their model to chapters of the Bible whose authorship was more hotly debated. By comparing these chapters to each of the three writing styles, the model was able to determine which group of authors was more likely to have written them. Even better: the model also explained why it was making these calls. "One of the main advantages of the method is its ability to explain the results of the analysis -- that is, to specify the words or phrases that led to the allocation of a given chapter to a particular writing style," said Kipnis. Since the text in the Bible has been edited and re-edited many times, the team faced big challenges finding segments that retained their original wording and language. Once found, these biblical texts were often very short -- sometimes just a few verses -- which made most standard statistical methods and traditional machine learning unsuitable for their analysis. They had to develop a custom approach that could handle such limited data. Limited data often brings fears of inaccuracy. "We spent a lot of time convincing ourselves that the results we were getting weren't just garbage," said Faigenbaum-Golovin. "We had to be absolutely sure of the statistical significance." To circumvent the issue, instead of using traditional machine learning, which requires lots of training data, the researchers used a simpler, more direct method. They compared sentence patterns and how often certain words or word roots (lemmas) appeared in different texts, to see if they were likely written by the same group of authors. A surprising find? The team discovered that although the two sections of the Ark Narrative in the Books of Samuel address the same theme and are sometimes regarded as parts of a single narrative, the text in 1 Samuel does not align with any of the three corpora, whereas the chapter in 2 Samuel shows affinity with the Deuteronomistic History (Joshua to Kings). Looking forward, Faigenbaum-Golovin said the same technique can be used for other historical documents. "If you're looking at document fragments to find out if they were written by Abraham Lincoln, for example, this method can help determine if they are real or just a forgery." "The study introduces a new paradigm for analyzing ancient texts," summarized Finkelstein. Faigenbaum-Golovin and her team are now looking at using the same methodology to unearth new discoveries about other ancient texts, like the Dead Sea Scrolls. She emphasized how much she enjoyed the long-term cross-disciplinary partnership. "It's such a unique collaboration between science and the humanities," she said. "It's a surprising symbiosis, and I'm lucky to work with people who use innovative research to push boundaries."
[2]
Breakthrough AI study identifies original authors of the Hebrew Bible
For centuries, scholars have debated who wrote the Bible. The texts were copied, edited, and compiled over generations, leaving behind few clues about their original authors. Despite theological and academic efforts, authorship of many biblical books has remained uncertain. Now, artificial intelligence may offer a breakthrough. An international team of researchers has used AI, statistical modeling, and linguistic analysis to examine the first nine books of the Hebrew Bible, known as the Enneateuch.
Share
Copy Link
An international research team uses AI and statistical modeling to analyze the first nine books of the Hebrew Bible, revealing distinct writing styles and likely authorship of debated chapters.
In a groundbreaking study published in PLOS One, an international team of researchers has employed artificial intelligence (AI) and statistical modeling to uncover hidden language patterns in the Hebrew Bible. The study, which focused on the first nine books known as the Enneateuch, has shed new light on the long-debated question of biblical authorship 1.
Source: Interesting Engineering
The research team, led by Shira Faigenbaum-Golovin, assistant research professor of Mathematics at Duke University, developed a custom AI-based statistical model to analyze subtle variations in word usage across biblical texts. This innovative approach was necessitated by the unique challenges posed by ancient texts, which have been edited and re-edited over time, often leaving only short segments of original wording 1.
The AI analysis revealed three distinct scribal traditions or writing styles spanning the Enneateuch. By examining simple and common words such as "no," "which," or "king," the model accurately identified differences between these traditions. Thomas Römer, a team member from the Collège de France, noted, "We found that each group of authors has a different style -- surprisingly, even regarding simple and common words" 1.
To validate their approach, the team selected 50 chapters from the first nine books of the Bible, each previously allocated by biblical scholars to one of the identified writing styles. The model successfully compared these chapters and proposed a quantitative formula for allocating each to one of the three writing styles 1.
Source: Phys.org
The researchers then applied their model to chapters of the Bible whose authorship was more contentious. By comparing these chapters to each of the three writing styles, the model determined the most likely group of authors. Importantly, the AI also provided explanations for its decisions, specifying the words or phrases that led to the allocation of a given chapter to a particular writing style 1.
One unexpected finding emerged from the analysis of the Ark Narrative in the Books of Samuel. Despite addressing the same theme, the text in 1 Samuel did not align with any of the three identified corpora, while the chapter in 2 Samuel showed affinity with the Deuteronomistic History (Joshua to Kings) 1.
The study's methodology has potential applications beyond biblical research. Faigenbaum-Golovin suggested that the same technique could be used to analyze other historical documents, such as determining the authenticity of texts attributed to historical figures like Abraham Lincoln 1.
Israel Finkelstein, head of the School of Archaeology and Maritime Cultures at the University of Haifa, summarized the significance of the study: "The study introduces a new paradigm for analyzing ancient texts" 1. This innovative approach, combining AI with traditional scholarly methods, represents a significant advancement in the field of biblical studies and ancient text analysis 2.
As the team looks to apply their methodology to other ancient texts like the Dead Sea Scrolls, this research exemplifies the potential of interdisciplinary collaboration between science and the humanities in pushing the boundaries of historical and literary analysis.
Summarized by
Navi
[2]
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reveals Meta's aggressive recruitment tactics, offering $100 million signing bonuses to poach AI talent. Despite the lucrative offers, Altman claims no top researchers have left OpenAI for Meta.
34 Sources
Business and Economy
19 hrs ago
34 Sources
Business and Economy
19 hrs ago
YouTube announces integration of Google's advanced Veo 3 AI video generator into Shorts format, potentially revolutionizing content creation and raising questions about the future of user-generated content.
7 Sources
Technology
3 hrs ago
7 Sources
Technology
3 hrs ago
Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, has made artificial intelligence's threat to humanity a key issue of his papacy, calling for global regulation and challenging tech giants' influence on the Vatican.
3 Sources
Policy and Regulation
3 hrs ago
3 Sources
Policy and Regulation
3 hrs ago
Google introduces Search Live, an AI-powered feature enabling back-and-forth voice conversations with its search engine, enhancing user interaction and multitasking capabilities.
11 Sources
Technology
3 hrs ago
11 Sources
Technology
3 hrs ago
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announces GPT-5's summer release, hinting at significant advancements and potential shifts in AI model deployment. Meanwhile, OpenAI renegotiates with Microsoft and expands into new markets.
2 Sources
Technology
3 hrs ago
2 Sources
Technology
3 hrs ago