Amazon's AI Data Center Set to House Most Polluting Fossil Fuel Power Plant in the United States

New Amazon Data Center Is Set to Have the Most Polluting Power Plant in the U.S.

The tech giant is investing in the natural-gas-burning power plant as part of a huge data center in Texas, even as it pledges to honor climate commitments. Amazon is investing in a natural-gas-burning power plant, as part of a huge data center in Texas, that could become the largest single source of climate pollution in the United States, the company confirmed Friday. The new gas-burning plant, if built to specifications, would be permitted to release more planet-warming gases than any other power plant in the country. Amazon has been struggling to meet its promise that it would effectively eliminate its planet-warming emissions by 2040 as part of the Climate Pledge, a voluntary agreement among companies that Amazon co-founded several years ago. Emissions from the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas is the main driver of global warming, which is dangerously heating the planet. Amazon's emissions have gone up each of the past several years. And the Seattle-based tech giant has acknowledged that rising emissions from A.I. data centers could get in the way of its climate goals. "The world looks different now than when we co-founded the climate pledge," said Margaret Callahan, an Amazon spokeswoman. Still, "our commitment hasn't changed," she said. The latest project, in Pecos County, Texas, seemed to epitomize the difficulty in meeting the goal. Artificial-intelligence data centers require immense amounts of energy to run the trillions of calculations needed to create A.I. systems and services. And the scale and urgency of their energy demands is fast exhausting the electricity-generating capacity of the nation's power grid. To avoid years of potential delays in hooking up to electrical utilities, data-center developers are increasingly choosing to build their own dedicated, on-site power plants instead. And gas-burning plants are usually the fastest and easiest to build. President Trump has supported the construction of power plants like these for data centers and has emphasized "energy dominance" by promoting oil, natural gas and coal over renewable power like solar and wind. Last year, Mr. Trump issued an executive order designed to make it easier to build and operate data centers, and since then federal agencies have introduced policies designed to fast-track their construction. Amazon said it had recently acquired the Pecos County site, where a developer is building the gas-burning plant. The plant would use 35 natural-gas turbines to generate up to 7.65 gigawatts of power to feed to Amazon's planned data center, according to permits for the project. The plant would not initially connect to the wider electricity grid, so "that won't raise electricity costs for Texas families," Amazon's Ms. Callahan said. The site is in a remote part of West Texas near the state's major natural-gas-producing regions. Ms. Callahan added that the company was also exploring the use of solar energy and battery storage at the data center, which she said would create thousands of new jobs. The tech company did not disclose how much it had paid. The power plant "could be a foreshadowing of what's to come," said Michael Thomas, founder of Cleanview, a company that tracks data-center energy infrastructure that on Friday reported Amazon's involvement in the project. Before this year, Amazon had powered its data centers with electricity from traditional utilities, which usually draw on a combination of fossil fuel generation and clean energy sources, Mr. Thomas said. The A.I. boom is changing that. "We're going to see an explosion of off-grid gas projects" in Texas and elsewhere, he said. Environmental groups said the scale of the plant would be damaging both for local air pollution and for the climate. "It's going to absolutely have a huge impact on the environment, and on public health," said Kathryn Guerra, a campaign director at Public Citizen, a corporate watchdog group that has opposed data center projects. The plant is permitted to release about 33 million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year. Facilities don't usually emit the maximum amounts allowed under their permits. Still, the permits provide the plant with ample room to exceed the emissions of the most polluting plant in the United States, the coal-burning James H. Miller Jr. Power Plant in Quinton, Ala., which emits about 16 million tons of carbon dioxide a year. Gas-burning plants also release smog-forming pollutants that can contribute to heart disease, asthma and other health problems.

AI Data Centers Are Causing Unfathomable Amounts of Air Pollution, and It Gets Worse With Each New One They Build

Can't-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech The amount of pollution spilling out of fossil-fuel generators is astounding. In the United States, this explosion of emissions is led by states like Texas, which on a global scale is comparable only to China in terms of new infrastructure powered by dead dinosaurs. And as more data centers crop up throughout the US, that problem -- of rising emissions linked to the accelerating demand for any kind of electricity -- is only going to get worse. According to reporting by the New York Times, the US currently has at least 82 data center-linked gas generators either in development or in the proposal stage. These are massive facilities which rival public electrical generators in size and power, only they're not managed by the government, and the power they generate isn't meant for citizens. Instead, these are private generators, developed by big tech companies like Mark Zuckerberg's Meta or Elon Musk's xAI. The electricity they'll supply is intended only for data centers, which grow ever-hungrier for power as new iterations of AI chips and energy-hungry large language models enter into production. Assuming all 82 of those plants come online as planned, the NYT notes they could spew enough emissions in one year to rival the output of half the passenger cars in the US. That's an astonishing amount of pollution, made possible thanks to industry-friendly state regulators in places like Texas and Ohio, where permits for behemoth fossil fuel fired generators are approved in as little as 18 days, often without public disclosure. It's possible that moratoriums on new data centers might slow the burn, but unless states begin the unlikely task of banning new gas generators for existing facilities, we can expect US fossil fuel emissions to continue to rise precipitously in the years to come. More on data centers: The Number of Regular People Being Arrested for Protesting Data Centers Is Astounding