3 Sources
[1]
One man, his dog, and ChatGPT: Australia's AI vaccine saga
Hong Kong (AFP) - Desperate to help his sick dog, one Australian man went down the ultimate ChatGPT research hole, using artificial intelligence to design a personalised experimental treatment and finding top scientists to administer it. Paul Conyngham's months-long quest to fight his rescue mutt
[2]
Man with no medical degree creates cancer vaccine using ChatGPT for his sick pet. Open AI CEO Sam Altman reacts: 'This should be easy ....'
An Australian businessman, Paul Conyngham, used AI tools like ChatGPT and AlphaFold to develop a personalized mRNA cancer treatment for his dog, Rosie. This remarkable endeavor, which involved collaboration with scientists and veterinarians, has sparked discussions about AI's potential in
[3]
One man, his dog, and ChatGPT: Australia's AI vaccine saga
Desperate to help his sick dog, one Australian man went down the ultimate ChatGPT research hole, using artificial intelligence to design a personalized experimental treatment and finding top scientists to administer it. Paul Conyngham's monthslong quest to fight his rescue mutt Rosie's cancer has
Share
Copy Link
Sydney-based AI consultant Paul Conyngham turned to ChatGPT, AlphaFold, and other AI tools to create a personalized experimental treatment for his rescue dog Rosie's terminal mast cell cancer. After months of AI-driven research and collaboration with university scientists, Rosie achieved partial remission with her largest tumor shrinking dramatically. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman praised the effort as an amazing story, though experts emphasize the need for rigorous scientific validation.
Paul Conyngham, a Sydney-based AI consultant, faced every pet owner's nightmare when his eight-year-old rescue dog Rosie was diagnosed with terminal mast cell cancer
1
. After nearly a year of misdiagnosis—where veterinarians dismissed visible symptoms as "just a rash"—a biopsy in 2024 confirmed the devastating news1
. With chemotherapy, standard immunotherapy, and surgery proving insufficient as costs mounted, Conyngham refused to accept the grim prognosis. Instead, he embarked on a months-long quest that would demonstrate AI's potential to accelerate medical research in unprecedented ways.Conyngham leveraged AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok to conduct intensive research into emerging cancer treatment options
1
. "I would have conversations and just keep them going non-stop" with these chatbots to study cancer therapies in-depth, he explained. Following their guidance, he invested $3,000 to have Rosie's genome sequenced and used the same AI platforms to analyze her DNA data1
. He then turned to AlphaFold, the scientific AI model that won the 2024 chemistry Nobel Prize, to better understand one of the mutated genes driving Rosie's disease1
. This AI-driven initiative focused on developing a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine—technology widely recognized during the Covid pandemic for training the body's immune system to fight specific threats.Source: Japan Times
ChatGPT recommended connecting with a University of New South Wales (UNSW) team, which proved instrumental in transforming Conyngham's research into reality
1
. Professor Martin Smith, who sequenced Rosie's genome, emphasized that "this was not a clinical trial by any means" and "it's not that AI cured cancer," but rather "it was really driven by his determination to help his dog"1
. Pall Thordarson, director of UNSW's RNA institute which created the vaccine, explained that Conyngham "used the AI program to design the actual mRNA sequence. And then he gave that information to us"1
. The chatbots even assisted in navigating the complex paperwork required for ethical approval, and through his expanding scientific network, Conyngham connected with a University of Queensland professor able to administer the experimental treatment for his dog1
.After receiving the custom personalized mRNA cancer vaccine along with powerful immunotherapy in December, Rosie achieved partial remission with her biggest tumor shrinking dramatically
1
3
. "She regained a lot of mobility and function," Conyngham reported, though not all tumors responded equally well and Rosie has required additional surgery since1
. The story captured global attention when OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called it an "amazing story" in a post on X on Friday, after reportedly meeting Conyngham personally1
2
. Altman later noted that "Paul is an extraordinary guy. This should be easy to do, but it is not yet," highlighting both the promise and current limitations of making such innovations accessible2
.
Source: ET
Related Stories
While Conyngham does not claim his findings represent a cure, experts unrelated to the case acknowledge its significance for personalized healthcare. "AI holds lots of promise to improve and accelerate our research strategies," said Nick Semenkovich at the Medical College of Wisconsin
1
. However, he cautioned that UNSW and Conyngham "haven't published scientific details outside of their press release and interviews, so we don't know enough about the AI vaccine to understand how much AI helped in its development—or if the vaccine worked the way it was designed"1
. Patrick Tang Ming-kuen from The Chinese University of Hong Kong noted that "AI transforms a 'needle-in-a-haystack' search into a data-driven selection process, drastically shortening the timeframe between diagnosis and vaccine construction," though he acknowledged the real risk of errors1
. Smith emphasized that the combination of "three different disruptive technologies: genome sequencing, artificial intelligence, and RNA therapeutics offers new possibilities and challenges"1
.Since the story went global, Smith's team has been fielding numerous requests: "my cat's got a disease, my dog's got a disease, my aunt has got a disease"
1
. But he cautions that "it's hard for us to be able to help" because "there's a lot of things that have to align"1
. Thordarson admits the "short answer is we don't know for sure" what actually led to the reduction in Rosie's largest tumor, and it remains unclear how long she has left to live1
. Experts emphasize that experimental medical interventions, even when supported by AI, require thorough testing, scientific validation, and professional oversight to ensure safety and effectiveness2
. The case demonstrates how AI can enable individuals without formal medical expertise to engage with complex scientific processes, yet the gap between possibility and accessibility remains substantial for widespread application in cancer treatment.Summarized by
Navi
[3]
1
Technology

2
Technology

3
Policy and Regulation
